Protoplasma

, Volume 176, Issue 3–4, pp 165–173 | Cite as

Plant nuclear protein p 56 and its elicitor-dependent transient biosynthesis

  • B. Schwer
  • H. Kindl
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Summary

Pulse labelling experiments with [35S]L-methionine were performed to determine the rate of protein synthesis. Treatment of cultured cells of peanut with fungal cell wall led to a drastic increase in the de novo synthesis of particular proteins in the cytosol, the endoplasmic reticulum and the extracellular compartment. In the nucleus, a single newly synthesized protein, designated p 56, was detectable upon elicitation by fungal elicitor. Pulse labelling with [35S]L-methionine for 1h was applied at various times following elicitation. The time course of p 56 biosynthesis was transient and the maximum of p 56 de novo synthesis preceded the one of the cytosolic protein stilbene synthase. The preferential de novo synthesis and transfer of p 56 to the nucleus, only briefly before the elicitortriggered signal chain causes the activation of nuclear defence genes, makes it a good candidate as member of the signal transduction machinery to the nucleus. p 56 was further characterized by its size as N-octyl-β-D-glucoside micelle. Selective solubilization experiments showed that p 56 is a hydrophobic, not salt extractable protein rather well protected against partial proteolysis.

Keywords

Arachis hypogaea Elicitor-dependent synthesis Nuclear protein Protein synthesis in vivo Solubilization 

Abbreviation

CHAPS

3-(cholamidopropyl-dimethylammonio)-propane-1-sulfonate

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albersheim P, Darvill A, Augur C, Cheong JJ, Eberhard S, Hahn MG, Marfa V, Mohnen D, Oneill MA, Spiro MD, York WS (1992) Oligosaccharins — oligosaccharide regulatory molecules. Account Chem Res 25: 77–83Google Scholar
  2. Beven A, Guan Y, Peart J, Cooper C, Shaw P (1991) Monoclonal antibodies to plant nuclear matrix reveal intermediate filament-related components within the nucleus. J Cell Sci 98: 293–302Google Scholar
  3. Boller T, Metraux JP (1988) Extracellular localization of chitinase in cucumber. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 33: 11–16Google Scholar
  4. Booth C (1971) Fungal culture media. Methods Microbiol 4: 49–94Google Scholar
  5. Bordier C (1981) Phase separation of integral membrane proteins in Triton X-114 solution. J Biol Chem 256: 1604–1607PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Briskin DP, Leonard RT, Hodges TK (1987) Isolation of the plasma membrane: membrane markers general principles. Methods Enzymol 148: 542–558Google Scholar
  8. Cosio EG, Frey T, Ebel J (1990) Solubilization and characteristics of the binding sites for fungal β-glucans from soybean cell membranes. FEBS Lett 264: 223–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Czichi U, Kindl H (1975) A model of closely assembled consecutive enzymes on membranes: formation of hydroxycinnamic acids from L-phenylalanine on thylakoids ofDunaliella marina. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 356: 475–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis L, Blobel G (1986) Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein. Cell 45: 699–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebel J (1986) Phytoalexin synthesis: the biochemical analysis of the induction process. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24: 235–264Google Scholar
  12. Garcia-Bustos J, Heitman J, Hall MN (1991) Nuclear protein localization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1071: 83–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerace L, Burke B (1988) Functional organization of the nuclear envelope. Annu Rev Cell Biol 4: 335–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. —, Ottaviano Y, Kondor-Koch C (1982) Identification of a major polypeptide of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 95: 826–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Greber UF, Gerace L (1992) Nuclear protein import is inhibited by an antibody to a lumenal epitope of a nuclear pore complex glycoprotein. J Cell Biol 116: 15–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson RC (1976) Polypeptides of the nuclear envelope. Biochemistry 15: 5641–5651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirsch C, Hahlbrock K, Kombrink E (1993) Purification and characterization of extracellular, acidic chitinase isoenzymes from elicitor-stimulated parsley cells. Eur J Biochem 213: 419–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. LeBel D, Poixer GG, Beaudoin AR (1978) A convenient method for the ATPase assay. Anal Biochem 85: 86–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matzke AJM, Matzke CB, Weiger T, Matzke MA (1992) A large conductance ion channel in the nuclear envelope of a higher plant cell. FEBS Lett 302: 81–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meier UT, Blobel G (1990) A nuclear localization signal binding protein in the nucleolus. J Cell Biol 111: 2235–2245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Neale AD, Wahleithner JA, Lund M, Bonnett HT, Kelly A, Meeks-Wagner DR, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1990) Chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, osmotin, and extensin are expressed in tobacco explants during flower formation. Plant Cell 2: 673–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Postius C, Kindl H (1978) The occurrence of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and cinnamic acid p-hydroxylase on the endoplasmic reticulum of suspension cultures ofGlycine max. Z Naturforsch 33 c: 65–69Google Scholar
  23. Ray PM (1977) Auxin-binding sites of maize coleoptiles are localized on membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Physiol 59: 594–599Google Scholar
  24. —, Shininger TL, Ray MM (1969) Isolation of β-glucane synthetase particles from plant cells and identification with Golgi membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64: 605–612Google Scholar
  25. Rolfs C-H, Fritzemeier K-H, Kindl H (1981) Cultured cells ofArachis hypogaea susceptible to induction of stilbene synthase (Resveratrol-forming). Plant Cell Rep 1: 83–85Google Scholar
  26. —, Schön H, Steffens M, Kindl H (1987) Cell-suspension culture ofArachis hypogaea L.: model system of specific enzyme induction in secondary metabolism. Planta 172: 238–244Google Scholar
  27. Saxena PK, Fowke LC, King J (1985) An efficient procedure for isolation of nuclei from plant protoplasts. Protoplasma 128: 184–189Google Scholar
  28. Silver PA (1991) How proteins enter the nucleus. Cell 64: 489–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sturm A, Kindl (1983) Fucosyl transferase activity and fucose incorporation in vivo as markers for subfractionating cucumber microsomes. FEBS Lett 160: 165–168Google Scholar
  30. Willmitzer L, Wagner KG (1981) The isolation of nuclei from tissue cultured plant cells. Exp Cell Res 135: 69–77PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Schwer
    • 1
  • H. Kindl
    • 1
  1. 1.Biochemie, FB ChemieUniversität MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations