Population and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 227–245 | Cite as

An examination of constructivist and gibsonian approaches to environmental psychology

  • Harry Heft
Article

Abstract

Much of the conceptual and empirical work in environmental psychology has been directly shaped byconstructivism — a metatheoretical framework which views perception as essentially a cognitive process. Two influential constructivist theories are information-processing and Piaget's genetic epistemology. As a consequence of adopting this framework, environmental psychologists have focused their investigations on cognitive processes rather than the environment. However, the role played by cognitive processes in perception is a function of the degree to which phenomenal characteristics of the environment are specified in the information available to the perceiver, and the present emphasis by environmental psychologists on cognitive processes may reflect an underestimate of the richness of this information. J. J. Gibson's ecological analysis of perception postulates that environmental layout and meaning are directly specified in ambient light, and, as a result, his account suggests that the environment is a direct and unmediated determinant of perception and action. Further, he offers a framework which allows for both an objective and psychologically meaningful description of the environment. For these reasons, his perspective has much to offer the environmental psychologist.

Keywords

Cognitive Process Empirical Work Ambient Light Constructivist Theory Ecological Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acredolo, L.P. Development of spatial orientation in infancy.Developmental Psychology 1978, 14, 224–234.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, R.G.Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R.M. Ecological approaches to understanding human crowding.Journal of Population 1979,2 235–258.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R.M., & Rodin, J. Personal control as a mediator of crowding. In A. Baum, J.E. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.),Advances in environmental psychology: Vol 1, the urban environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Brunswik, E.Perception and the representative design of experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, D.T. Pattern matching as an essential of distal knowing. In K.R. Hammond (Ed.),The psychology of Egon Brunswik. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, S. Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J.E. Singer, & S. Valins (Eds.),Advances in environmental psychology: Vol. 1, the urban environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, S. Cognitive processes as determinants of environmental stress. In I. Sarason & C. Speilberger (Eds.),Stress and anxiety (Vol. 7). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  9. Cutting, J.E., Proffitt, D.R., & Kozlowski, L.T. A biomechanical invariant for gait perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978,4 357–372.Google Scholar
  10. Downs, R.M., & Stea, D. Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In R.M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J.J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, J.J.An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. Haber, R.N., & Hershenson, M.The psychology of visual perception (2nd ed.).New York:Holt, Rhinehard, & Winston 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Hart, R.A., &Moore, G.T. The development of spatial cognition: A review. InR.M. Downs &D. Stea (Eds.),Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
  15. Heft, H. The role of environmental features in route-learning: Two exploratory studies of way-finding.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior 1979a,3 172–185.Google Scholar
  16. Heft, H. Environmental features, orientation, and way-finding. Unpublished manuscript, 1979b.Google Scholar
  17. Heft, H. What Heil is missing in Gibson: A reply.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 1980,10 187–194.Google Scholar
  18. Kaplan, S. Adaptation, structure, and knowledge. In G.T. Moore & R.G. Gollege (Eds.),Environmental knowing: Theories, research, and methods. Stroudsburgh, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. Kuhn, T.S.The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Laurendeau, M., & Pinard, A.The development of the concept of space in the child. New York: International Universities Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Lynch, K.The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  22. Menzel, E.W. Cognitive mapping in chimpanzees. In S.H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W.K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. Milgrim, S. The experience of living in cities.Science 1970,167 1461–1468.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, G.T. Knowing about environmental knowing: The current state of theory and research on environmental cognition.Environment and Behavior 1979,11 33–70.Google Scholar
  25. Piaget, J.The mechanisms of perception (trans. by G.N. Seagrim). New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar
  26. Pick, A.D. Listening to melodies: Perceiving events. In A.D. Pick (Ed.),Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, B.Human knowledge: Its scope and its limits. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1948.Google Scholar
  28. Schmidt, D.E. & Keating, J.P. Human crowding and personal control: An integration of the research.Psychological Bulletin 1979,86 680–700.Google Scholar
  29. Siegel, A.W., Kirasic, K.C., & Kail, R.V. Stalking the elusive cognitive map: The development of children's representation of geographic space. In I. Altman & J.F. Wohlwill (Eds.),Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research, Vol. 3,Children and the environment. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. Tolman, E.C. Cognitive maps in rats and men.Psychological Review 1978,55 189–208.Google Scholar
  31. Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R. The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of per-Psychological Review 1977,84 67–80.Google Scholar
  32. Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R. The primacy of perceiving: an ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. In L. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  33. Weimer, W.B. The history of psychology and its retrieval from historiography: I. The problematic nature of history.Science Studies 1974a,4 235–258.Google Scholar
  34. Weimer, W.B. The history of psychology and its retrieval from historiography: II: The methodology of scientific research.Science Studies 1974b,4 367–369.Google Scholar
  35. Weimer, W.B. A conceptual framework for cognitive psychology: Motor theories of the mind. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
  36. Wohlwill, J.F. The environment is not in the head! In W.F.E. Preiser (Ed.),Environmental design research, Vol. 2. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, 1973.Google Scholar
  37. Wohlwill, J.F. Up from psychogeography!: A comment on the state of environmental-cognition theory and research. Unpublished manuscript, 1975.Google Scholar
  38. Wohlwill, J.F. Searching for the environment in environmental research: A commentary on research strategy. In G.T. Moore & R.G. Golledge (Eds.),Environmental knowing: Theories, research, and methods. Stroudsburgh, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Heft
    • 1
  1. 1.Denison UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations