Chromosomengröße und DNS-Gehalt bei drei Anthemideen (Asteraceae-Anthemideae)
Abhandlungen
Received:
- 25 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Zusammenfassung
Cytophotometrische DNS-Messungen an drei diploiden Anthemideen-Arten mit gleicher Zahl, aber unterschiedlicher Größe der Chromosomen zeigen, daß mit der phylogenetischen Reduktion der Chromosomengröße auch der DNS-Gehalt diploider Zellkerne abnimmt. Die Bedeutung dieser Veränderungen für die Evolution wird diskutiert.
Chromosome size and DNA content in three species of Asteraceae-anthemideae
Summary
Cytophotometric DNA measurements have been made in three diploid species of the Anthemideae, all with the same chromosome number, but with differences in chromosome size. It is shown that the phylogenetic reduction in chromosome size is closely correlated with a reduced DNA content of diploid nuclei. The evolutionary significance of such changes is discussed.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literaturverzeichnis
- Babcock, E. B., 1947: The genusCrepis. I and II. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.21 and22, 1030 S.Google Scholar
- Bachmann, K., B. A. Harrington, andJ. P. Craig, 1972: Genome size in birds. Chromosoma37, 405–416.Google Scholar
- Baetcke, K. P., A. H. Sparrow, C. H. Naumann, andS. S. Schwemmer, 1967: The relationship of DNA content to nuclear and chromosome volumes and to radiosensitivity (LD50). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.58, 533–540.Google Scholar
- Bendich, A. J., andB. J. McCarthy, 1970: DNA comparisons among barley, oats, rye and wheat. Genetics65, 545–565.Google Scholar
- Bennett, M. D., 1971: The duration of meiosis. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, B178, 277–279.Google Scholar
- Chooi, W. Y., 1971: Variation in nuclear DNA content in the genusVicia. Genetics68, 195–211.Google Scholar
- Conger, A. D., andL. M. Fairchild, 1953: A quick-freeze method for making smear slides permanent. Stain Technol.28, 281–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dowrick, G. J., andA. S. El Bayumi, 1969: Nucleic acid content and chromosome morphology inChrysanthemum. Genet. Res.13, 241–250.Google Scholar
- Ehrendorfer, F., 1970: Evolutionary patterns and strategies in seed plants. Taxon19, 185–195.Google Scholar
- Greger, H., 1969: Flavonoide und Systematik der Anthemideae (Asteraceae). Naturwiss.56, 467–468.Google Scholar
- Mitsuoka, S., andF. Ehrendorfer, 1972: Cytogenetics and evolution ofMatricaria and related genera (Asteraceae-Anthemideae). Österr. Bot. Z.120, 155–200.Google Scholar
- Patau, K., 1952: Absorption microphotometry of irregular-shaped objects. Chromosoma5, 341–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Probst, F., 1972: Contribution à l'étude taxonomique du genreLeucanthemum par voie cytophotométrique. Chromosoma36, 322–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rees, H., andM. H. Hazarika, 1969: Chromosome evolution inLathyrus. In:Darlington, C. D., andK. R. Lewis, Chromosomes Today2, 158–165. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- —, andR. N. Jones, 1972: The origin of the wide species variation in nuclear DNA content. Intern. Rev. Cytol.32, 53–92.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. E. Arnold, London; VIII + 216 S.Google Scholar
- Stowell, R. E., 1945: Feulgen reaction for thymonucleic acid. Stain Technol.20, 45–58.Google Scholar
- Tanaka, R., 1969: A comparative study on the distribution of labelled DNA in the chromosomes ofChrysanthemum lineare andCh. nipponicum. Cytologia34, 503–510.Google Scholar
- Uitz, H., 1970: Cytologische und bestäubungsexperimentelle Beiträge zur Verwandtschaft und Evolution der Anthemideae (Asteraceae). Diss. Univ. Graz, 83 S.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 1973