Plant and Soil

, Volume 36, Issue 1–3, pp 31–38 | Cite as

Microflora of a coniferous forest of the Mexican basin

  • María Valdés-Ramírez
Article

Summary

Soil profiles were made at three locations corresponding to the three principal coniferous groups:Pinus montezumae, Abies religiosa andPinus hartwegii. The soil samples were submitted to microbiological, physical and chemical analysis. Mycorrhizic fungi were collected throughout this zone and 25 species of ectotrophic and 1 facultative mycorrhizic fungiLaccaria laccata were found.Lycoperdon perlatum andHygrophorus chrysodon were in the three communities, as wellAmanita muscaria, Boletus granulatus andCantharellus cibarius were only in the Pinus communities. The experimental condition used in order to prove symbiosis showed us several symbionts in the root for each one of the three different conifers. As regards general microflora, the greatest number of bacteria and fungi was present in the surface horizon of Abies soil; these soils are deep and moist throughout the year and with a good drainage, so that seasonal variations have little or no effect on soil environmental conditions and that favors the microbiological development. In the soils of the Pinus communities the number of actinomycetes and of bacteria is higher immediately below the surface horizon.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Becking, J. H., Nitrogen fixation and mycorrhiza inPodocarpus root nodules. Plant and Soil,23, 213–227 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boujoucos, G. J., A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agron. J.43, 434–438 (1951).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bryan, W. C. and Zak, B., Isolation of fungal symbionts from pines mycorrhizae. Forest Sci.9, 270–278, (1963).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corke, C. T., Nitrogen transformation in Ontario Forest Podzols. Forest Soils Conf. 8–11 Sept., 116–121, (1958).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Leval, J. and Remacle, J., A microbiological study of the rhizosphere of poplar. Plant and Soil21, 31–47 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guzmán, G., Estudio taxonómico y ecológico de los hongos neurotrópicos mexicanos. Tesis professional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas (1959).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guzmán, G., Hongos (Macromicetos) comunes en la ruta Amecameca-Tlamacas (Volcán Popocatépetl) México.In Guía de Excursiones, III Congreso Mexicano de Botánica, (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herrera, T. and Guzmán, G., Taxonomia y ecología de los principales hongos comestibles de diversos lugares de México. Ann. Inst. Biol. Univ. Méx.32 (1–2), (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson, M. L., Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1958).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katznelson, H., The role of microorganisms in agricultural practice.In Global Impacts of Applied Microbiology, p. 201–217. Editor M. P. Starr, J. Wiley and Son Inc. London, New York (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Madrigal-Sánchez, X., Contribución al conocimiento de la ecologia de los bosques de oyamel en el Valle de Mexico. I.N.I.F., Bol. Tec. No.18, (1967).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marx, D. H. and Zak, B., Effect of pH on mycorrhizal formation of slash pine in aseptic culture. Forest Sci.11, 66–74 (1965).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maçura, J., Interaction nutritionelles plantes-microbes et bases expérimentales de la bactérisation des graines. Ann. Inst. Pasteur111, 2, 9–38 (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melin, E. and Nilsson, H., Transfer of labelled nitrogen from glutamic-acid to pine seedlings through the mycelium ofBoletus variegatus (SW.) Fr. Nature,171, 134 (1953).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munsell soil color charts. Color Company Inc. Baltimore, Maryland (1954).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ritter, G. and Lyr, H., The significance of mycorrhizal fungi of the utilization of different sources of phosphate byPinus silvestris L.In Plant Microbes Relationships between soil microorganisms and Plant Roots. Prague (1863).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rouatt, J. W. and Katznelson, H., A study on the bacteria on the root surface and in the rhizosphere soil of crop plants. J. Applied Bacteriol.24 164–171 (1961).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singer, R., Personal communication (1969).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singer, R. and Morelle, J. H., Ectotrophic forest tree mycorrhizae and forest communities. Ecol.41, 549–551 (1960).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trappe, J. M., Fungus associates of ectotrophic mycorrhizae. Botan. Rev.28, 000–000 (1962).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walkley, A., Critical examination for determining organic carbon in soils. Soil Sci.63, 251–264, (1947).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zak, B., Personal communication, (1966).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Valdés-Ramírez
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Microbiologia Agricola. Escuela Nacional de Ciencias BiológicaInstituto Politécnico NacionalMexico 17, D. F.

Personalised recommendations