Plant and Soil

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 167–171 | Cite as

Antibiotic resistance of soil bacteria

I. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria from rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils
  • Peter J. Harris
  • Malcolm Woodbine
Article

Summary

A total of 560 bacterial isolates from four rhizosphere and eight non-rhizosphere soils were examined for resistance to 7 antibiotics. There were marked differences between the overall levels of antibiotic resistance found in the different soils. The rhizosphere populations were not consistently more antibiotic resistant than their corresponding non-rhizosphere soils.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balicka, N., Utilisation of some nitrogen compounds by the microflora of the rhizosphere of clover and timothy grass grown as a pure crop and seed mixture. Acta Microbiol. Polon. II, 121–128 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brisbane, P. G. and Rovira, A. D., A comparison of methods for classifying rhizosphere bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol.26, 379–392 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, M. E., Stimulation of streptomycin-resistant bacteria in the rhizosphere of leguminous plants J. Gen Microbiol.24, 369–377 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gyurko, P., The antagonistic effect on soil bacteria of rhizosphere bacteria of sugar beet. Acta. Agron. Acad. Sci. Hung.9, 175–184 (1959).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gyurko, P., Kecskes, M., and Manninger, E., Further data concerning the resistance of rhizosphere bacteria of sugar beet to antibiotics. Fol. Microbiol.,6 347–349 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hely, F., Bergerson, F. J., and Brockwell, J., Microbial antagonism in the rhizosphere as a factor in the failure of inoculation of subterranean clover. Australian J. agr. Research8, 24–44 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holland, A. A., The effect of indigenous saprophytic fungi upon nodulation and establishment of subterrenean clover. Proc. 9th Easter Sch. Agr. Sci. Univ. Nott. 147–164 (1962).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kecskes, M., Manninger, E., and Totos, R., Inhibitive effect of antibiotics on micro-organisms on the root surface of grape vines. Pedobiologia3, 22–33 (1963).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lochhead, A. G. and Chase, F. E., Qualitative studies of soil microorganisms. V. Nutritional requirements of the predominant bacterial flora. Soil Sci.55, 185–195 (1943).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stevenson, I. L. and Rouatt, J. W., Qualitative studies of soil microorganisms. XI. Further observations on the nutritional classification of bacteria. Can. J. Botany31, 438–447 (1953).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stout, J. D., The antibiotic relationships of some free-living bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol.27, 209–219 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Harris
    • 1
  • Malcolm Woodbine
    • 1
  1. 1.Microbiological Unit, Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of NottinghamEnglish
  2. 2.Dept. of Soil Sciencethe UniversityReadingEngland

Personalised recommendations