International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 53–61 | Cite as

Penetrating gunshots to the head and lack of immediate incapacitation

I. Wound ballistics and mechanisms of incapacitation
  • B. Karger
Review Article

Abstract

There are two distinct mechanisms of ballistic injury. Crushing of tissue resulting in a permanent tract is the primary factor in wounding of most tissues and most body regions. Temporary cavitation causes radial tissue displacement and subsequent shearing, compression and especially stretching of tissue analogous to blunt trauma. In contrast to the effect in elastic tissue, temporary cavitation can contribute substantially to wounding of inelastic tissue, such as the brain. This is the case in penetrating gunshot wounds to the head. Additionally, the penetration of the bony cranium can produce secondary missiles in the form of bone or bullet fragments and a tendency of the bullet to deformation and early yaw. Most important, wounding resulting from temporary cavitation is greatly augmented by the confined space provided by the unyielding walls of the skull. Bone contact and enhanced effects of temporary cavitation result in an enlarged zone of disintegrated tissue and in high intracranial peak pressures. Morphological signs of powerful intracranial pressure effects are cortical contusion zones, indirect skull fractures and perivascular haemorrhages remote from the tract. Depending on ballistic and anatomical parameters, the intracranial effect varies from slightly more severe injury than in isolated soft tissue to an “explosive” type of injury with comminuted fractures of the skull and laceration of the brain. Incapacitation is the physiologically based inability to perform complex and longer lasting movements independent of consciousness or intention. Immediate incapacitation is possible following craniocerebral gunshot wounds or wounds that disrupt the upper cervical spinal cord only. Rapid incapacitation can be produced by massive bleeding from major vessels or the heart. Immediate incapacitation is the result of primary intracranial effects of the bullet. A mechanism similar to commotio cerebri applied extracranially does not exist in cases of penetrating gunshot wounds to the head.

Key words

Wound ballistics Penetrating gunshot wounds of the head Physical activity Incapacitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen IV, Scott R, Tanner JA (1982) Experimental high-velocity missile head injury. Injury 14:183–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen IV, Kirk J, Maynard RL, Cooper GK, Scott R, Crockard A (1983) Experimental penetrating head injury: some aspects of light microscopical and ultrastructural abnormalities. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 32:99–104Google Scholar
  3. Barnett JC, Meirowsky AM (1955) Intracranial hematomas associated with penetrating wound of the brain. J Neurosurg 12:34–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg S (1964) Die Durchschlagskraft von Pistolengeschossen im menschlichen Körper. Arch Kriminol 134:17–23Google Scholar
  5. Beyer JC (ed) (1962) Wound ballistics. Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington DC, p 135Google Scholar
  6. Black AN, Burns BD, Zuckerman S (1941) An experimental study of the wounding mechanism of high-velocity missiles. BMJ 2:872–874Google Scholar
  7. Bowen TE, Bellamy RF (1988) Emergency war surgery, second United States revision of the emergency war surgery handbook. United States Department Of Defense, Washington DC, pp 1333Google Scholar
  8. Butler FG, Puckett WO, Harvey EN, McMillan JH (1945) Experiments on head wounding by high velocity missiles. J Neurosurg 2:358–363Google Scholar
  9. Callender GR, French RW (1935) Wound ballistics. Studies in the mechanism of wound production by rifle bullets. Mil Surg 77:177–201Google Scholar
  10. Carey ME, Sarna GS, Farrel JB, Happel LT (1989) Experimental missile wound to the brain. J Neurosurg 71:754–764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clemedson CJ, Falconer B, Frankenberg L, Jönsson A, Wennerstrand J (1973) Head injuries caused by small-calibre, high-velocity bullets. Z Rechtsmed 73:103–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper GJ, Ryan JM (1990) Interaction of penetrating missiles with tissues: some common misapprehensions and implications for wound management. Br J Surg 77:606–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crockard HA (1975) Early intracranial pressure studies in gunshot wounds of the brain. J Trauma 15:339–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crockard HA, Brown FD, Johns LM, Mullan S (1977a) An experimental cerebral missile injury model in primates. J Neurosurg 46:776–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Crockard HA, Brown FD, Calica AB, Johns LM, Mullan S (1977b) Physiological consequences of experimental cerebral missile injury and use of data analysis to predict survival. J Neurosurg 46:784–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Denny-Brown D, Russel WR (1941) Experimental cerebral concussion. Brain 64:93–164Google Scholar
  17. DiMaio VJM (1985) Gunshot wounds. Practical aspects of firearms, ballistics and forensic techniques. Elsevier, New York Amsterdam OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. DiMaio VJM, Zumwalt RE (1977) Rifle wounds from high velocity, center-fire hunting ammunition. J Forensic Sci 22:132–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaio VJM, Jones JA, Caruth WW III, Anderson LL, Petty CS (1974) A comparison of the wounding effects of commercially available handgun ammunition suitable for police use. FBI Law Enforce Bull 43 (12):3–8Google Scholar
  20. Dittmann W (1989) Wundballistische Untersuchungen zur Klinik der Schädel-Hirn-Schußverletzungen. Wehrmed Monatsschr 33:3–14Google Scholar
  21. Dzieman AJ, Mendelson JA, Lindsey D (1961) Comparison of the wounding characteristics of some commonly encountered bullets. J Trauma 1:341–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fackler ML (1987) Position paper. In: Wound ballistic workshop, Quantico, September 15–17, 1987: 9 mm vs .45 auto, FBI Academy Firearms Training Unit, pp 8–17Google Scholar
  23. Fackler ML (1988) Wound ballistics. A review of common misconceptions. JAMA 259:2730–2736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fackler ML (1989) Wounding patterns of military rifle bullets. Int Defense Rev 1:59–64Google Scholar
  25. Fackler ML (1991) Comment to Cat Brain Shots. Wound Ballistics Rev 1(1):41–42Google Scholar
  26. Fackler ML (1992) Police handgun ammunition selection. Wound Ballistics Rev 1(3):32–37Google Scholar
  27. Fackler ML, Malinowski JA (1985) The wound profile: a visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. J Trauma 25:522–529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fackler ML, Peters CE (1991) The “shock wave” myth (and comment). Wound Ballistics Rev 1(1):38–40Google Scholar
  29. Fackler ML, Surinchak JS, Malinowski JA, Brwen RE (1984a) Bullet fragmentation: a major cause of tissue disruption. J Trauma 24:35–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fackler ML, Surinchak JS, Malinowski JA, Bowen RE (1984b) Wounding potential of the Russian AK-74 assault rifle. J Trauma 24:263–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fackler ML, Bellamy RF, Malinowski JA (1988) The wound profile: Illustration of the missile-tissue interaction. J Trauma 28(1)[Suppl]:S21-S29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Finnie JW (1993) Pathology of experimental traumatic craniocerebral missile injury. J Comp Pathol 108:93–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Freytag E (1963) Autopsy findings in head injuries from firearms. Statistical evaluation of 254 cases. Arch Pathol (Lond) 76:215–225Google Scholar
  34. Gerber AM, Moody RA (1972) Craniocerebral missile injuries in the monkey: an experimental physiological model. J Neurosurg 36:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Goroncy C (1924) Handlungsfähigkeit Kopfschußverletzter. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 4:145–164Google Scholar
  36. Harvey EN, Butler EG, McMillan JH, Puckett WO (1945) Mechanism of wounding. War Med 8:91–104Google Scholar
  37. Harvey EN, Korr IM, Oster G, McMillan JH (1947) Secondary damage in wounding due to pressure changes accompanying the passage of high velocity missiles. Surgery 21:218–239Google Scholar
  38. Hatcher JS (1935) Textbook of pistols and revolvers. Their ammunition, ballistics and use. Smallarms technical publications company, MarinesGoogle Scholar
  39. Henn R, Liebhardt E (1969) Zur Topik außerhalb des Schußkanals gelegener Hirnrindenblutungen. Arch Kriminol 143:188–191Google Scholar
  40. Hollerman JJ, Fackler ML, Coldwell DM, Ben-Menachem Y (1990) Gunshot wounds. 1. Bullets, ballistics and mechanisms of injury. AIR 155:685–690Google Scholar
  41. Hopkinson DAW, Watts JC (1963) Studies in experimental missile injuries of skeletal muscle. Proc R Soc Med 56:461–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Illchmann-Christ A (1951) Zur Frage der Beurteilung der Handlungsfähigkeit und Lebensdauer nach stumpfen Schädeltraumen. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 44:586–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Jason A (1991) The “twilight zone” of wound ballistics. Wound Ballistics Rev 1(1):8–9Google Scholar
  44. Kaufman HH, Loyola WP, Makela ME, Frankowsky RF, Wagner KA, Bustein DP, Gildenberg PC (1986) Gunshot wounds to the head: a perspective. Neurosurgery 18:689–695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kirkpatrick JB, DiMaio VJM (1978) Civilian gunshot wounds of the brain. J Neurosurg 48:185–198Google Scholar
  46. Klages U, Weithoener D, Frössler H, Terwort H (1975) Überlebenszeit, Handlungsfähigkeit und röntgenologische Diagnostik bei Schußverletzungen des Schädels. Z Rechtsmed 76:307–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Klaue R (1949) Die indirekten Frakturen der vorderen Schädelgrube beim Schädeldachschuß. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd 161:167–193Google Scholar
  48. Knudsen PJT, Theilade P (1993) Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullet. Autopsy findings. Int J Legal Med 106:61–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kocher T (1895) Zur Lehre von den Schußwunden durch die Kleinkalibergeschosse. Fischer, CasselGoogle Scholar
  50. Kolsky H (1980) The role of stress waves in penetration processes. In: Labile RC (ed) Ballistic materials and penetration mechanics. Elsevier, New York, pp 185–223Google Scholar
  51. König HG, Schmidt V (1989) Beobachtungen zur Ausbreitungsgeschwindigkeit und Entstehungsursache von Berstungsfrakturen beim Schuß. Beitr Gerichtl Med 47:247–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Krauss M (1957) Studies in wound ballistics: temporary cavity effects in soft tissues. Mil Med 121:221–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Krönlein RU (1899) Beitrag zur Lehre der Schädel-Hirnschüsse aus unmittelbarer Nähe mittels des schweizerischen Repetiergewehrs Modell 1889. Arch Klin Chir 59:67–76Google Scholar
  54. Lampel W, Langenbach HJ (1961) Geschoßwirkung auf Wild. Wild Hund 64:41–52Google Scholar
  55. Levy V, Rao VJ (1988) Survival time in gunshot and stab wound victims. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 9:215–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lindsey D (1980) The idolatry of velocity, or lies, damn lies, and ballistics. J Trauma 20:1068–1069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Lorenz R (1948) Der Schußkanal im Röntgenbilde. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 39:435–448Google Scholar
  58. Meixner K (1931) Die Handlungsfähigkeit Schwerverletzter. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 16:139–165Google Scholar
  59. Mertens (1917) Ein Beitrag zur Erklärung der Krönlein'schen Schädel-Hirnschüsse. Beitr Klin Chir 108:371–394Google Scholar
  60. Metter D, Schulz E (1983) Morphologische Merkmale der Schußwunden in Leber und Milz. Z Rechtsmed 90:167–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Naegeli O (1884) Zwei perforirende Hirnschüsse. Mord oder Selbstmord? Vjschr Gerichtl Med 40:231–264Google Scholar
  62. Newgard K (1992) The physiological effects of handgun bullets. Wound Ballistics Rev 1(3):12–17Google Scholar
  63. Noetzel H (1948) Über die Hirnkontusion beim einfachen äußeren Prellschuß. Nervenarzt 19:12–21Google Scholar
  64. Oehmichen M, König HG, Staak M (1985) Morphologie des Hirnschusses. Beitr Gerichtl Med 43:55–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pankratz H, Fischer H (1985) Zur Wundballistik des KrönleinSchusses. Z Rechtsmed 95:213–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Payr E (1922) Der frische Schädelschuß. In: Schjerning O von (ed) Handbuch der ärztlichen Erfahrungen im Weltkrieg 1914/1918, vol 1. Barth, Leipzig, pp 285–410Google Scholar
  67. Peng L, Cheng Z, Guangji Z, Yinqiou L, Reifeng G (1990) An experimental study of craniocerebral injury caused by 7.62 mm bullets in dogs. J Trauma (China) Suppl 6(2):187–191Google Scholar
  68. Petersohn F (1967) Über die Aktions- und Handlungsfähigkeit bei schweren Schädeltraumen. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 59:259–270Google Scholar
  69. Ragsdale BD, Josselson A (1988) Experimental gunshot fractures. J Trauma Suppl 28(1):S109-S115Google Scholar
  70. Robens W, Kusswetter W (1982) Fracture typing to human bone by assault missile trauma. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 508:223–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Schorstein J (1947) Intracranial haematoma in missile wounds. Br J Surg War Surg Suppl 1:96–111Google Scholar
  72. Schrader G (1942) Selbstmord durch 5 Herzschüsse. Beitr Gerichtl Med 16:117–120Google Scholar
  73. Scott R (1983) Pathology of injuries caused by high-velocity missiles. Clin Lab Med 3:273–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sellier K (1971) Über Geschoßablenkung und Geschoßdeformation. Z Rechtsmed 69:217–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sellier K (1982) Schußwaffen und Schußwirkungen I. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 252–254Google Scholar
  76. Sellier K, Kneubuehl BP (1994) Wound ballistics and the scientific background. Elsevier, Amsterdam London New York Tokyo, pp 144–149, 245Google Scholar
  77. Siccardi D, Cavaliere R, Pau A, Lubinu F, Turtas S, Viale GL (1991) Penetrating craniocerebral missile injuries in civilians: a retrospective analysis of 314 cases. Surg Neurol 35:455–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sight WP (1969) Ballistic analysis of shotgun injuries to the central nervous system. J Neurosurg 31:25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith OC (1987) Position paper, incapacitation effectiveness. In: Wound Ballistic Workshop, Quantico, 15–17 September 1987: 9 mm vs .45 auto, FBI Academy Firearms Training Unit, pp 22–25Google Scholar
  80. Smith OC, Berryman HE, Lahren CH (1987) Cranial fracture pattems and estimate of direction from low velocity gunshot wounds. J Forensic Sci 32:1416–1421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Spatz H (1941) Gehirnpathologie im Kriege. Von den Gehirnwunden. Zentralbl Neurochir 6:162–212Google Scholar
  82. Spitz WU, Petty CS, Fisher RS (1961) Physical activity until collapse following fatal injury by firearms and sharp pointed weapons. J Forensic Sci 6:290–300Google Scholar
  83. Strassmann G (1935) Über Lebensdauer und Handlungsfähigkeit Schwerverletzter. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 24:393–400Google Scholar
  84. Sturdivan L (1969) Terminal behavior of the 5.56 mm ball in soft targets. Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Report 1447Google Scholar
  85. Suneson A, Hansson H-A, Seeman T (1988) Central and peripheral nervous damage following high-energy missile wounds in the thigh. J Trauma Suppl 28:S197-S203Google Scholar
  86. Tamaska L (1968) Die gerichtsmedizinische Bedeutung der sekundären traumatischen Stammhirnblutungen. Beitr Gerichtl Med 24:131–138Google Scholar
  87. Unterharnscheidt F (1993) Pathologie des Nervensystems, VI/A. Traumatologie von Him und Rückenmark. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 45–46, 369–371Google Scholar
  88. Walcher K (1929) Über Bewußtosigkeit und Handlungsunfähigkeit. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 13:313–322Google Scholar
  89. Watkins FP, Pearce BP, Stainer MC (1988) Physical effects of the penetration of head simulants by steel spheres. J Trauma Suppl 28(1):S40-S54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Karger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Legal MedicineWestfälische Wilhelms-UniversitätMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations