Dropouts and continuers in Gamblers Anonymous: Part four. Evaluation and summary
- 42 Downloads
Gamblers anonymous may be better at coping with those whose gambling has been severely excessive and had led to many problems. However GA's approach is not so easily accepted and therefore not so effective with those who seek help at an earlier stage in the development of their problems.
Gamblers Anonymous may work better with those who have few relapses or best with those who have none at all. Although it may be very helpful in avoiding relapses, it may be less helpful in dealing with them when they do occur.
problems of the representativeness of the sample, of generalizing to Gamblers Anonymous as a whole, and of arguing from associations to causes are discussed. A general picture of the organization as a whole is presented.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown, R. I. F. (1985a). The effectiveness of gamblers anonymous. In W.R. Eadington (Ed.)The gambling studies: Proceedings of the sixth national conference on gambling and risk taking Vol 5, Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
- Brown, R. I. F. (1985b). Dropouts and continuers in Gamblers Anonymous: Part 1, life-context and other factors.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, (in press).Google Scholar
- Brown R. I. F. (1986a). Dropouts and continuers in Gamblers Anonymous: Part 2, analysis of free-style accounts of experiences of GA.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3, (in press).Google Scholar
- Brown, R. I. F. (1986b). Dropouts and continuers in Gamblers Anonymous: Part 3, some possible specific reasons for dropout.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3, (in press).Google Scholar