Advertisement

Population and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 45–73 | Cite as

Repeat migration, information costs, and location-specific capital

  • Julie DaVanzo
Article

Abstract

It is well-known from previous research that recent migrants often migrate again. This paper seeks to illuminate several possible mechanisms that might give rise to this association. The effect of previous migration on subsequent migration appears to be largely due to the fact that the consequences of one move often become the cause of the next and that people tend to return to places they recently left. The concepts of location-specific capital (assets that are more valuable in their current location than they would be elsewhere) and information costs provide powerful explanations for the patterns of multiple movement disclosed in the longitudinal data used in this study.

Keywords

Powerful Explanation Longitudinal Data Current Location Information Cost Recent Migrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, W.A.V., & Huff, J.O. Some empirical tests of duration of stay effects in intraurban migration.Environment and Planning 1977,9(12), 1357–1374.Google Scholar
  2. DaVanzo, J. An analytical framework for studying the potential effects of an income maintenance program on U.S. interregional migration. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, R-1081-EDA, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. DaVanzo, J. Differences between return and nonreturn migration: An econometric analysis.International Migration Review, 1976(a),10(1), 13a.Google Scholar
  4. DaVanzo, J. Why families move: A model of the geographic mobility of married couples. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, R-1972-DOL, 1976(b).Google Scholar
  5. DaVanzo, J. Repeat migration in the U.S.: Who moves back and who moves on? Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute. An Applied Systems Analysis, WP-80-158, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. DaVanzo, J., & Morrison, P.A. Return and other sequences of migration in the United States.Demography 1981,18 85–102.Google Scholar
  7. Eldridge, H.T., Primary, secondary, and return migration in the United States.Demography 1965,2 444–455.Google Scholar
  8. Goldstein, S.Patterns of Mobility, 1910–1950. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  9. Land, K.C. Duration of residence and prospective migration: Further evidence.Demography 1969,6 133–140.Google Scholar
  10. Lansing, J.B., & Mueller, E. (eds.). The geographic mobility of labor. Ann Arbor. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Long, L.H. & Hansen, K.A. Models of return, repeat, and primary migration by age and race. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, 1977a.Google Scholar
  12. Long, L.H. & Hansen, K.A. Size of areal units and the rate and volume of return migration. 1977b. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  13. Morrison, P.A. Chronic movers and the future redistribution of population.Demography 1971,8(2), 171–184.Google Scholar
  14. Navratil, F.J., & Doyle, J.J. The socioeconomic determinants of migration and the level of aggregation.Southern Economic Journal 1977,43(4), 1547–1559.Google Scholar
  15. Nerlove, M., & Press, S.J. Univariate and multivariate log linear and logistic models. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, R-1306-EDA/NIH, 1973.Google Scholar
  16. Sjaastad, J.A. The costs and returns of human migration.Journal of Political Economy 1962,70(4), 80–93S.Google Scholar
  17. Speare, A. Home ownership, life cycle stage, and residential mobility.Demography 1970,7(4), 449–458.Google Scholar
  18. Speare, A. Kobrin, F., & Kingkade, W.The Influence of Socioeconomic Bonds and Levels of Satisfaction on Interstate Migration. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Survey Research Center.A Panel Study of Income Dynamics, I andII. Ann Arbor. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1968–1972 Interviewing Years. 1972.Google Scholar
  20. Ter Heide, H. Some Aspects of Internal Migration in the Netherlands.Sociologia Neerlandica 1968,4 (2), 137–158.Google Scholar
  21. Van Arsdol, Jr., M.S., Sabagh, G.B., Butler, E.W. Retrospective and Subsequent Metropolitan Residential Mobility.Demography 1968,5 pp. 249–267.Google Scholar
  22. Yezer, A.M.J. & Thurston, L. Migration Patterns and Income Change: Implications for the Human Capital Approach to Migration.Southern Economic Journal 1976,42 (4), p. 693–702.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie DaVanzo
    • 1
  1. 1.The Rand CorporationUSA

Personalised recommendations