Equivariant cohomology and stable cohomotopy

Bredon, G. E.: Equivariant cohomology theories. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 34. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1967Google Scholar

Bredon, G. E.: Introduction to compact transformation groups. Pure and Applied Mathematics Series. New York: Academic Press 1972Google Scholar

tom Dieck, T.: Lokalisierung äquivarianter Kohomologie-Theorien. Math. Z.121, 253–262 (1971)Google Scholar

tom Dieck, T.: Bordism ofG-manifolds and integrality theorems. Topology 9, 345 to 358 (1970)Google Scholar

Dress, A.: A characterization of solvable groups. Math. Z.110, 213–217 (1969)Google Scholar

Dress, A.: Contributions to the theory of induced representations in “Classical” algebraicK-theory, and connections with arithmetic, 183–240. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol.342. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar

Kosniowski, C.: Localizing the Burnside ring. Math. Ann.204, 93–96 (1973)Google Scholar

Kramer, H.: On the singularities of the Burnside ring of a finite group. Papers from Open House for Algebraists, Aarhus University, Various publ. ser.17, 53–71 (1970)Google Scholar

Lee, C. N.: Equivariant Homology theories. Proc. Conference on Transformation Groups, 237–244. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1968Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. J.: D. Phil. thesis. Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar

Palais, R. S.: Seminar on transformation groups, A. Borelet al. Ann. of Math. Studies No.46, Princeton (1960)Google Scholar

Segal, G.: Classifying spaces and spectral sequences. Publ. Math. I.H.E.S.34, 105–112 (1968)Google Scholar

Segal, G.: EquivariantK-theory. Publ. Math. I.H.E.S.34, 129–151 (1968)Google Scholar

Segal, G.: Equivariant stable homotopy theory. Actes. Congres Intern. Math.2, 59–63 (1970)Google Scholar