Population and Environment

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 231–255 | Cite as

Population and the energy problem

  • John P. Holdren
Article

Abstract

When energy is scarce or expensive, people can suffer material deprivation and economic hardship. When it is obtained in ways that fail to minimize environmental and political costs, these too can threaten human wellbeing in fundamental and pervasive ways. The energy problem today combines these syndromes: much of the world's population has too little energy to meet basic human needs; the monetary costs of energy are rising nearly everywhere; the environmental impacts of energy supply are growing and already dominant contributors to local, regional, and global environmental problems (including air pollution, water pollution, ocean pollution, and climate change); and the sociopolitical risks of energy supply (above all the danger of conflict over oil and the links between nuclear energy and nuclear weapons) are growing too. This predicament has many causes, but predominant among them are the nearly 20-fold increase in world energy use since 1850 and the cumulative depletion of the most convenient oil and gas deposits that this growth has entailed, resulting in increasing resort to costlier and/or environmentally more disruptive energy sources. The growth of world population in this period was responsible for 52% of the energy growth, while growth in per capita energy use was responsible for 48% (excluding causal connections between population and energy use per capita). In the United States in the same period, population growth accounted for 66% of the 36-fold increase in energy use. In the late 1980s, population growth was still accounting for a third of energy growth both in the United States and worldwide. Coping with global energy problems will require greatly increased investment in improving the efficiency of energy enduse and in reducing the environmental impacts of contemporary energy technologies, and it will require financing a transition over the next several decades to a set of more sustainable (but probably also more expensive) energy sources. The difficulty of implementing these measures will be greatest by far in the developing countries, not least because of their high rates of population growth and the attendant extra pressures on economic and managerial resources. If efficiency improvements permit delivering the high standard of living to which the world aspires based on a per capita rate of energy use as low as 3 kilowatts—about a quarter of the current U.S. figure—then a world population stabilized at 10 billion people would be using energy at a rate of 30 terawatts, and a population of 14 billion would imply 42 terawatts (compare 13.2 terawatts in 1990). Delivering even the lower figure at tolerable monetary and environmental costs will be difficult; each additional billion people added to the world population will compound these difficulties and increase energy's costs, making everyone poorer.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bleviss, D. L. (1988).The new oil crisis and fuel economy technologies: Preparing the light transportation industry for the 1990s. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  2. British Petroleum (1990).BP Statistical Review of World Energy. London: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Brower, M. (1990).Cool energy: The renewable solution to global warming. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
  4. Brobst, D. A., & Pratt, W. P. [Eds.]. (1973).U.S. mineral resources. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, H. (1954).The Challenge of Man's Future. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, L. R., Durning, A., Flavin, C., French, H., Jacobson, J., Lowe, M., Postel, S., Renner, M., Starke, L., & Young, J. (1990).State of the world 1990. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Bureau of the Census. (1972).Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. Bureau of the Census (1989).Statistical Abstract of the United States 1989. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Carlsmith, R. S., Chandler, W. U., McMahon, J. E., & Santini, D. J. (1990).Energy efficiency: how far can we go? (Report ORNL/TM-11441). Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  10. Central Intelligence Agency. (1989).The World Factbook 1989. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  11. Commoner, B. (1971).The closing circle. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Commoner, B. (1990).Making peace with the planet. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, E. (1976).Man, energy, society. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  14. Darmstadter, J. (1968).Energy in the world economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deese, D. A., & Nye, J. S. (1981).Energy and security. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrlich, P. R. (1986).The Machinery of Nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (1990).The population explosion. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth.Science, 171 1212–1217.Google Scholar
  19. Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1972. May). One-dimensional ecology.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. pp. 16–27.Google Scholar
  20. Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Holdren, J. P. (1977).Ecoscience: population, resources, environment. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  21. Energy Information Administration. (1989).International Energy Annual 1988. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Energy Information Administration. (1990).Monthly Energy Review (January). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. Farinelli, U., & Valant, P. (1990). Energy as a source of potential conflicts.International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 2 31–40.Google Scholar
  24. Gleick, P. H. (1989). The implications of global climatic changes for international security.Climatic Change, 15 309–325.Google Scholar
  25. Gleick, P. H. (1990). Climate change and international politics.Ambio 18, 333–339.Google Scholar
  26. Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T. B., Reddy, A. K. N., & Williams, R. H. (1987).Energy for a Sustainable World. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Graedel, T. E., & Crutzen, P. J. (1989. September). The changing atmosphere.Scientific American, pp. 58–68.Google Scholar
  28. Haefele, W. (1990. September). Energy from nuclear power.Scientific American, pp 136–144.Google Scholar
  29. Haefele, W. (1981).Energy in a Finite World: A Global Systems Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, C. A. S., Cleveland, C. J., & Kaufmann, R. (1986).Energy and resource quality: The ecology of the economic process. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, D. O., Barnard, G. W., & Moss, P. A. (1982).Biomass for energy in developing countries. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  32. Harte, J. (1985).Consider a spherical cow: a course in environmental problem solving. Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  33. Hirst, E. (1990). Why the federal government should help improve US energy efficiency.Ambio 19, 96–98.Google Scholar
  34. Hirst, E., Clinton, J., Geller, H., & Kroner, W. (1986).Energy efficiency in buildings: Progress and promise. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  35. Holdren, J. P. (1986). Energy and the human predicament. In K. R. Smith, F. Fesharaki, & J. P. Holdren [Eds.].Earth and the human future: essays in honor of Harrison Brown (pp. 124–160). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  36. Holdren, J. P. (1987). Global environmental issues related to energy supply.Energy, 12 975–992.Google Scholar
  37. Holdren, J. P. (1989). Civilian nuclear technologies and nuclear weapons proliferation. In C. Schaerf, B. Holden-Reid, & D. Carlton [Eds.].New technologies and the arms race (pp 161–198). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  38. Holdren, J. P. (1990. September). Energy in transition.Scientific American, pp. 156–163.Google Scholar
  39. Holdren, J. P., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Human population and the global environment.American Scientist, 62 282–292.Google Scholar
  40. Holdren, J. P., Anderson, K. B., Deibler, P. M., Gleick. P. H., Mintzer, I. M., & Morris, G. P. (1983). In C. C. Travis & E. L. Etnier [Eds.].Health risks of energy technologies (pp. 141–208). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  41. Holdren, J. P., Berwald, D., Budnitz, R., Crocker, J., Delene, J. G., Endicott, R., Kazimi, M., Krakowski, R., Logan, G., & Schultz, K. (1988). Exploring the competitive potential of magnetic fusion energy: The interaction of economics with safety and environmental characteristics.Fusion Technology, 13 7–56.Google Scholar
  42. Hubbert, M. K. (1969). Energy resources. In National Research Council,Resources and Man (pp. 157–241). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  43. Hughart, D. (1979).Prospects for traditional and non-conventional energy sources in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  44. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1990).Policymakers summary of the scientific assessment of climate change. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
  45. International Energy Agency (1989).Electricity conservation. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  46. Johansson, T. B., Bodlund, B., & Williams, R. H. [Eds.]. (1989).Electricity: Efficient end-use and new generation technologies and their planning implications. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lashof, D. A., & Tirpak, D. A. [Eds.]. (1989).Policy options for stabilizing global climate. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  48. Lipschutz, R. D., & Holdren, J. P. (1990). Crossing borders: Resource flows, the global environment, and international security.Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 21 121–133.Google Scholar
  49. Lovins, A., & Sardinsky, R. (1988).The state of the art: lighting. (Competitek report). Old Snowmass, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.Google Scholar
  50. Miller, A. S., Mintzer, I. M., & Hoaglund, S. H. (1986).Growing power: Bioenergy for development and industry. (WRI Study No. 5). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, Norman. [Ed.]. (1984).Gaia: An atlas of planetary management. London: Gaia Books.Google Scholar
  52. National Research Council, Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems. (1990).Energy in transition 1985–2010. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  53. Ogden, J. M., & Williams, R. H. (1989).Solar hydrogen: moving beyond fossil fuels. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  54. Okken, P., Swart, R., & Zwerver, S. [Eds.] (1989).Climate and energy: The feasibility of controlling CO 2 emissions. Dorchtecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Office of Technology Assessment. (1983).Industrial energy use. (Report OTA-E-198). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  56. Population Reference Bureau. (1990).1990 World Population Data Sheet. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenfeld, A. H., & Hafemeister, D. (1988, April). Energy-efficient buildings.Scientific American, pp. 78–85.Google Scholar
  58. Ross, M. (1989). Energy and transportation in the United States.Annual Review of Energy, 14 131–171.Google Scholar
  59. Schipper, L., & Ketoff, A. (1989). Energy efficiency: The perils of a plateau.Energy Policy, 17 538–542.Google Scholar
  60. Schipper, L., Howarth, R., & Geller, H. (in press). United States energy use between 1983 and 1987: The impacts of greater efficiency.Annual Review of Energy. Google Scholar
  61. Schneider, S. H. (1989).Global warming. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  62. Schneider, S. H., & Londer, R. (1986).The coevolution of climate and life. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, K. R. (1987).Biofuels, air pollution, and health. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  64. Solar Energy Research Institute. (1981).A new prosperity: Building a sustainable energy future. Andover, MA: Brick House.Google Scholar
  65. Solar Energy Research Institute. (1989).The potential of renewable energy. [Prepared jointly with the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Sandia National Laboratories]. Golden, CO: Author.Google Scholar
  66. Study of Critical Environmental Problems (1970).Man's impact on the global environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sweet, W. (1984).The nuclear age: power, proliferation, and the arms race. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
  68. UN Environment Programme (1987).Environmental data report. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Williams, R. H. (1990).Hydrogen from coal with gas and oil well sequestering of the recovered CO 2. Unpublished manuscript. Princeton University, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, R. H., Larson, E. D., & Ross, M. (1987). Materials, affluence, and industrial energy use.Annual Review of Energy, 12 99–144.Google Scholar
  71. World Bank. (1983).The energy transition in developing countries. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  72. World Bank. (1990).World Development Report 1989. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. World Energy Conference. (1983).Energy 2000–2020: World prospects and regional stresses. London: Graham and Trotman.Google Scholar
  74. World Resources Institute (1990).World resources 1990–91: A guide to the global environment. [In collaboration with the United Nations Environment Programme and the United Nations Development Programme]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Yergin, D. (1988). Energy security in the 1990s.Foreign Affairs, 67(1 110–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Holdren
    • 1
  1. 1.Energy and Resources groupUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations