, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 270–275 | Cite as

Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment

  • J. A. Castell
  • D. O. Castell


There has been renewed interest in the use of manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment in the investigation of pharyngeal dysphagia. Advances in technology have alleviated previous difficulties presented by factors such as the rapid response rate of the striated muscle and asymmetry of the upper esophageal sphincter. Close attention to technique can overcome difficulties with movement artifacts encountered during deglutition. Manometry is being used to study normal swallow function and the effects of physiologic changes. There are also increasing numbers of reports in the literature of manometric studies in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. This technique provides information on pressure changes and augments that information obtained from a barium swallow.

Key words

Manometry Dysphagia Deglutition Upper esophageal sphincter Pharynx Deglutition disorders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dodds WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ: Considerations about pharyngeal manometry.Dysphagia 1:209–214, 1987Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orlowski J, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Dent J, Hogan WJ, Amdorfer RC: Requirements for accurate manometric recording of pharyngeal and esophageal peristaltic pressure waves.Invest Radio 17:567–572, 1982Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stef JJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Hinehan JH, Stewart ET: Intraluminal esophageal manometry: an analysis of variables affecting recording fidelity of peristaltic pressures.Gastroenterology 67:221–230, 1974Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson JA, Pryde A, Maher L, Macintyre CCA, Binghua S, Heading RC: Influence of biological and recording variables on pharyngeal pressure measurement.Gullet (July 1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castell JA, Castell DO: Computer analysis of human esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter pressure II. An interactive system for on-line data collection and analysis.Dig Dis Sci 31:121–126, 1986Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winans CS: The pharyngoesophageal closure mechanism. A manometric study.Gastroenterology 63:768–77, 1972Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Welch RW, Luckmann K, Ricks PM, Drake ST, Gates GA: Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alteration in laryngectomy.J Clin Invest 63:1036–1041, 1979Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sears VW, Castell JA, Castell DO: Radial and longitudinal asymmetry of the human pharynx.Gastroenterology 101:1559–1563, 1991Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerhardt DC, Castell DO, Winship DH, Schuck TJ: Esophageal dysfunction in esophagopharyngeal regurgitation.Gastroenterology 78:893–897, 1980Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knuff TE, Benjamin SB, Castell DO: Pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's) diverfculum: a reappraisal.Gastroenterology 82:734–736, 1982Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green WER, Castell JA, Castell DO: Upper esophageal sphincter pressure recording: Is an oval manometry catheter necessary?Dysphagia 2:162–165, 1988Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO: Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans.Am J Physiol 258:G173–178, 1990Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lydon SB, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Amdorfer RC: The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording.Dig Dis Sci 20:968–970, 1975Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaye MD, Showalter JP: Measurement of pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter: the influence of catheter diameter.Dig Dis Sci 19:860–863, 1974Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Logemann JA: Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharynges' phases of swallowing.ARJ 154:953–963, 1990Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Shah V, Ha T: Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing.Gastroenterology 97:1469–1478, 1989Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Logemann JA, Shaker R: Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition.Gastroenterology 95:52–62, 1988Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO: On-line computer analysis of human lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.Am J Physiol 255:G794-G799, 1988Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dent J, Chir B: A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement.Gastroenterology 71:263–267, 1976Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isberg A, Nilsson ME, Schiaratzki H: Movement of the upper esophageal sphincter and a manometric device during deglutition: a cineradiographic investigation.Acta Radiol (Stockh) 26:381–388, 1985Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Lydon SB, Stewart ET, Stef JJ, Amdorfer RC: Quantitation of pharyngeal motor function in normal human subjects.J Appl Physiol 39:692–696, 1975Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rex DK, Hast JL, Lehman GA, Mathis J, Elmore M: Comparison of radially sensitive and circumferentially sensitive microtransducer esophageal manometry probes in normal subjects.Am J Gastroenterol 83:151–154, 1988Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson JA, Pryde A, Macintyre CCA, Heading RC: Normal pharyngoesophageal motility: a study of 50 healthy subjects.Dig Dis Sci 34:1590–1599, 1989Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO: Effects of body position and bolus consistency on the manometric parameters and coordination of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx.Dysphagia 5:179–86, 1990Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cook IJ, Dent J, Collins SM: Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation.Dig Dis Sci 34:672–676, 1989Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fulp SR, Dalton CB, Castell JA, Casteli DO: Aging-related alterations in human upper esophageal sphincter function.Am J Gastroenterol 85:1569–1572, 1990Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Knauer CM, Castell JA, Dalton CB, Nowak L, Castell DO: Pharyngeal/upper esophageal sphincter pressure dynamics in humans: effects of pharmacologic agents and thermal stimulation.Dig Dis Sci 35:774–780, 1990Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Haeverle B, Hogan WJ, Amdorfer RC: Effect of sleep, spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux, and a meal on upper esophageal sphincter pressure in normal human volunteers.Gastroenterology 92:466–471, 1987Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cook IJ, Dent J, Shannon S, Collins SM: Measurement of upper esophageal sphincter pressure: effect of acute emotional stress.Gastroenterology 93:526–532, 1987Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Castell JA, Castell DO, Duranceau A: Manometric characteristics of patients with oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) (Abstract)Gastroenterology 100:A39, 1991Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dudnick RS, Castell JA, Castell DO: Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter function in achalasia.Am J Gastroenterol 87:1712–1715, 1992Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yarze JC, DeNuna SF, Varga J, Jiminez S, Castell JA, Stampfl D, Castell DO: Proximal esophageal manometry in scleroderma (PSS) (Abstract)Gastroenterology 100:A189, 1991Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Castell JA, Castell DO, Schultz AR, Georgeson S: Effect of head position on the dynamics of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx.Dysphagia 8:1–6, 1992Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dantas RO, Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Kern MK, Lang IM, Brasseur JG: Biomechanics of cricopharyngeal bars.Gastroenterology 99:1269–1276, 1990Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cook IJ, Gabb M, Panagopoulos V, Jamieson GG, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Shearman DJ: Pharyngeal (Zenker's) diverticulum: a disorder of upper esophageal sphincter opening defined by si multaneous videoradiography and manometry.Gastroenterology 103:1229–1235, 1992Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Castell
    • 1
  • D. O. Castell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineThe Graduate HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations