, Volume 167, Issue 1–2, pp 55–65

Ultrastructure of root cortical cells parasitized by the ring nematodeCriconemella xenoplax

  • R. S. Hussey
  • C. W. Mims
  • S. W. WestcottIII
Original Papers


Individuals of the plant-parasitic nematodeCriconemella xenoplax, monoxenically cultured on root expiants of clover, carnation, and tomato, fed continuously for up to 8 days from single cells in the outer root cortex. Individual cortical cells parasitized by nematodes were modified into discrete “food cells” in all hosts examined. The nematode's stylet penetrated between epidermal cells and frequently through a subepidermal cortical cell. Electron-transparent callose-like material continuous with the cell wall enveloped the portion of the stylet that traversed subepidermal cortical cells. Food cells were typically located in the first or second cell layers of the cortex. The stylet penetrated 5–6 μm through the wall of the food cell without penetrating the plasma membrane. Electron-transparent callose-like deposits formed between the invaginated plasma membrane and stylet, except at its aperture. The plasma membrane of the food cell was appressed tightly to the wall of the stylet aperture creating a 130–160 nm hole in the membrane. This opening provided continuity between the lumen of the stylet and the food cell cytosol for ingestion of nutrients by the nematode. Ribosomes were dissociated from the cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum in food cells and accumulated with other cell organelles in a zone of modified cytoplasm around the stylet. A fibrillar material appeared to form a barrier in the cytosol around the stylet aperture that limited movement of cell organelles toward the aperture. Electron-dense secretory components were secreted into the food cell by the nematode. Clusters of putative nematode secretory components consisting of 20–40 nm diameter, electron-dense particles were dispersed in the densely particulate zone of cytoplasm around the stylet tip. The cytosol immediately around the stylet aperture in the center of the modified cytoplasm was finely granular.

Plasmodesmata connecting the cytoplasm of the food cell with the cytoplasm of neighboring cells were greatly modified in a way that could facilitate solute transport into the food cell. The plasma membrane-lined canals of the modified plasmodesmata appeared to be increased in diameter and lacked desmotubules. Additionally, they frequently were lengthened by electron-transparent callose-like deposits projecting from the wall into the cytoplasm of the food cell. An electron-dense “cap” that formed an apparent tight seal with the plasma membrane developed over the entrance of each modified plasmodesma in the neighboring cells. These caps excluded all cell organelles from the cytosol contained within them. The nucleus of the food cell was usually enlarged and atypically shaped with dense peripheral clumps of condensed chromatin. Our results show thatC. xenoplax induces elaborate cellular modifications in host tissue to support sustained ingestion of nutrients from a single food cell.


Ectoparasite Feeding site Host-parasite interface Monoxenic culture Plant-parasitic nematode Plasmodesmata Symplastic transport Transmission electron microscopy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aist JR (1976) Papillae and related wound plugs of plant cells. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14: 145–163Google Scholar
  2. Adelman MR, Sabatini DD, Blobel B (1973) Ribosome-membrane interaction. Nondestructive disassembly of rat liver rough microsomes into ribosomal and membranous components. J Cell Biol 56: 206–229Google Scholar
  3. Conti GG, Bassi M, Maffi D, Bocci AM (1986) Host-parasite relationship in a susceptible and a resistant rose cultivar inoculated withSphaerotheca pannosa. II. Deposition rates of callose, lignin and phenolics in infected or wounded cells and their possible role in resistance. J Phytopathol 117: 312–320Google Scholar
  4. Dropkin VH (1979) How nematodes induce disease. In: Horsfall JG Cowling EB (eds) Plant disease, an advanced treatise, vol 4, how pathogens induce disease. Academic Press, New York, pp 219–238Google Scholar
  5. — (1969) Cellular responses of plants to nematode infections. Annu Rev Phytopathol 7: 101–122Google Scholar
  6. Endo BY (1987) Ultrastructure of esophageal gland secretory granules in juveniles ofHeterodera glycines. J Nematol 19: 469–483Google Scholar
  7. Gamborg OL, Murashige T, Thorpe TA, Vagil IK (1976) Plant tissue culture media. In Vitro 12: 473–478Google Scholar
  8. Hussey RS (1989) Disease-inducing secretions of plant-parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Pytopathol 27: 123–141Google Scholar
  9. —, Mims CW (1991) Ultrastructure of feeding tubes formed in giantcells induced in plants by the root-knot nematodeMeloidogyne incognita. Protoplasma 162: 99–107Google Scholar
  10. Jones MGK (1976) The origin and development of plasmodesmata. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW (eds) Intercellular communication in plants: studies on plasmodesmata. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 81–105Google Scholar
  11. — (1981) Host cell responses to endoparasitic nematode attack: structure and function of giant cells and syncytia. Ann Appl Biol 97: 353–372Google Scholar
  12. —, Payne HL (1977) The structure of syncytia induced by the phytoparasitic nematodeNacobbus aberrans in tomato roots, and the possible role of plasmodesmata in their nutrition. J Cell Sci 23: 299–313Google Scholar
  13. Kitajima EW, Lauritis JA (1969) Plant virions in plasmodesmata. Virology 37: 681–685Google Scholar
  14. Mims CW, Richardson EA, Taylor J (1988) Specimen orientation for transmission electron microscopic studies of fungal germ tubes and appressoria on artifical membranes and leaf surfaces. Mycologia 80: 586–590Google Scholar
  15. Nims RC, Halliwell RS, Rosberg DW (1967) Wound healing in cultured tobacco cells following microinjection. Protoplasma 64: 305–314Google Scholar
  16. Northcote DH, Davey R, Lay J (1989) Use of antisera to localize callose, xylan and arabinogalactan in the cell-plate, primary and secondary walls of plant cells. Planta 178: 353–366Google Scholar
  17. Nyczepir RP, Reilly CC, Motsinger RE, Okie WR (1988) Behaviour parasitism, morphology, and biochemistry ofCriconemella xenoplax andC. ornata on peach. J Nematol 20: 40–46Google Scholar
  18. Rebois RV (1980) Ultrastructure of a feeding peg and tube associated withRotylenchulus reniformis in cotton. Nematologica 26: 396–405Google Scholar
  19. Robards AW (1976) Plamodesmata in higher plants. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW (eds) Intercellular communication in plants: studies on plasmodesmata. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg pp 15–57Google Scholar
  20. —, Lucas WJ (1990) Plasmodesmata. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41: 369–419Google Scholar
  21. Schuerger AC, McClure MA (1983) Ultrastructure changes induced byScutellonema brachyurum in potato roots. Phytopathology 73: 70–81Google Scholar
  22. Streu HT, Jenkins WR, Hutchinson MT (1961) Nematodes associated with carnations,Dianthus caryophyllus L. with special reference to the parasitism and biology ofCriconemoides curvatum Raski. New Jersey Agricult Exp Stat Bull 800Google Scholar
  23. Thomas HA (1959) OnCriconemoides xenoplax Raski, with special reference to its biology under laboratory conditions. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 26: 55–59Google Scholar
  24. Van der Woude C, Lembi A, Morré DJ, Kindinger JL, Ordin L (1974) β-Glucan synthetases of plasma membrane and Golgi apparatus from onion stem. Plant Physiol 54: 333–340Google Scholar
  25. Valluri JV, Soltes EJ (1990) Callose formation during wound-inoculated reaction ofPinuselliottii toFusarium subglutinans. Phytochemistry 29: 71–72Google Scholar
  26. Westcott III SW (1990) Behaviour ofCriconemella xenoplax on roots in monoxenic culture. Phytopathology 80: 1046–1047Google Scholar
  27. Wyss U (1981) Ectoparasitic root nematodes: feeding behaviour and plant cell responses In: Zuckerman BM, Rohde RA (eds) Plant parasitic nematodes, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 325–351Google Scholar
  28. —, Stender C, Lehmann H (1984) Ultrastructure of feeding sites of the cyst nematodeHeterodera schachtii Schmidt in roots of susceptible and resistantRaphanus sativus L. var.oleiformis cultivars. Physiol Plant Pathol 25: 21–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Hussey
    • 1
  • C. W. Mims
    • 1
  • S. W. WestcottIII
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant Pathology and PhysiologyClemson UniversityClemson

Personalised recommendations