Advertisement

Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 99–135 | Cite as

Structure and function of the fused rhabdom

  • Allan W. Snyder
  • Randolf Menzel
  • Simon B. Laughlin
Article
Received:

Summary

This paper considers the functional significance of fused rhabdoms. Since all rhabdomeres are joined tightly together, the possibility of optical and electrical coupling between retinula cells is greatly enhanced. We study the extent and consequences of this coupling in order to understand the functional significance of fused rhabdoms. Our methods include both theory and intracellular recordings. The results are as follows:

Optical Coupling. Because rhabdomeres of different spectral types are fused into a common light guide, the absorption properties of each influence the manner in which light is transmitted along the composite rhabdom structure.
  1. 1.

    Each rhabdomere acts as if it were an absorption filter in front of all others, i.e. rhabdomeres function as lateral absorption filters (Fig. 4).

     
  2. 2.

    As a consequence of this filtering, the shape of the spectral sensitivity curve for each retinula cell is approximately independent of the amount of light it absorbs, i.e. independent of the rhabdomere's length and concentration of photopigment (Fig. 7). This is in direct contrast to the retinula cells of fly that have spectral sensitivity curves which become progressively flatter as more light is absorbed (Snyder and Pask, 1973). In other words, the flattening of curves by self absorption is prevented by optical coupling.

     
  3. 3.

    Thus, one functional advantage of the fused rhabdom (due to optical coupling) is that each retinula cell can have a high absolute sensitivity while preserving its spectral identity (narrow spectral sensitivity curves). (Compare Fig. 5 to Fig. 6.) Thus the same receptors can operate in a high sensitivity and in a colour vision system (cf. vertebrate rods and cones).Since all spectral cell types are together in one rhabdom, the animal can have hue discrimination in a small field of view (fine grain colour vision). Thus an individual ommatidium has the potential for providing excellent spectral discrimination.

     
  4. 4.

    If two cells have photopigments with absorption maxima close together, the maxima of their spectral sensitivity curves are moved further apart (Fig. 8).

     
  5. 5.

    In the absence of electrical coupling polarization sensitivity (PS) can depend dramatically on wavelength. The spectral composition of the rhabdom, in addition to the direction of the microvilli, profoundly influences the polarization sensitivity vs. wavelength PS (λ) curves of individual retinula cells. This is shown theoretically for the worker bee rhabdom (Fig. 10) where (a) there is a pronounced difference in PS (λ) between cells with orthogonal microvilli and (b) green retinula cells show a large PS in the green while the UV cells show a much smaller PS in the UV (Fig. 13).

     

Keywords

Colour Vision Electrical Coupling Optical Coupling Pask Polarization Sensitivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Autrum, H., Zwehl, V. von: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit einzelner Sehzellen des Bienenauges. Z. vergl. Physiol.48, 357–384 (1964)Google Scholar
  2. Bullock, T. H., Horridge, G. A.: Structure and function in the nervous systems of invertebrates, vol. I and II. San Francisco-London: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1965Google Scholar
  3. Burkhardt, D.: Colour discrimination in insects. Advanc. Insect Physiol.2, 131–174 (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Butler, R.: The identification and mapping of spectral cell types in the retina ofPeriplaneta america. Z. vergl. Physiol.72, 67–80 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Dartnall, H. J. A.: The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. Brit. med. Bull.9, 24–30 (1953)Google Scholar
  6. Dartnall, H. J. A.: Photosensitivity. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. VII/1. Photochemistry of vision, ed. H. J. A. Dartnall. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972Google Scholar
  7. Eakin, R. M.: Evolution of photoreceptors. Evol. Biol.2, 194–242 (1968)Google Scholar
  8. Eakin, R. M.: Structure of invertebrate photoreceptors. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, ed. Dartnall, H. J. A., ch. 16. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972 Vol. VII/1Google Scholar
  9. Eguchi, E.: Fine structure and spectral sensitivities of retinula cells in the dorsal sector of compound eyes in the dragonflyAeschna. Z vergl. Physiol.71, 201–208 (1971)Google Scholar
  10. Eguchi, E., Waterman, T. H., Akiyama, J.: Cellular basis of wavelength discrimination in the crayfishProcambarus. Amer. Zool.12, 252 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Frisch, K. von: The dance, language and orientation of bees. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1967Google Scholar
  12. Furshpan, E. J., Potter, D. D.: Transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfish. J. Physiol. (Lond.)145, 289–325 (1959)Google Scholar
  13. Gribakin, F. G.: Types of photoreceptor cells in the compound eye of the worker honey bee relative to their spectral sensitivity. Cytologia11, 309–314 (1969)Google Scholar
  14. Gribakin, F. G.: The distribution of the long wave photoreceptors in the compound eye of the honey bee as revealed by selective osmic staining. Vision Res.12, 1225–1230 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. Grundler, O. J.: Morphologische Untersuchungen am Bienenauge nach Bestrahlung mit Licht verschiedener Wellenlängen. Cytobiol.7, 105–110 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. Hamdorf, K., Höglund, G., Langer, H.: Mikrophotometrische Untersuchungen an der Retinula des NachtschmetterlingsDeilephila elpenor. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges.65, 276–280 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. Helversen, O. von: Zur spektralen Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit der Honigbiene. J. comp. Physiol.80, 439–472 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. Horridge, G. A.: Unit studies on the retina of dragonflies. Z. vergl. Physiol.62, 1–37 (1969)Google Scholar
  19. Horridge, G. A.: Optical mechanism of clear zone eyes. In: The compound eye and vision of insects, ed. G. A. Horridge. In press (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Kirschfeld, K.: The visual system ofMusca: Studies on optics, structure and function. Information Processing in the Visual Systems of Arthropods, ed. R. Wehner, p. 61–74. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972Google Scholar
  21. Laughlin, S. B.: Neural integration in the first optic neuropile of dragonflies: I. Signal amplification in a dark-adapted second order neuron. J. comp. Physiol.84, 338–358 (1973)Google Scholar
  22. Locket, N. A.: Deep sea fish retinas. Brit. med. Bull.26, 107–111 (1970)Google Scholar
  23. Menzel, R.: The fine structure of the compound eye ofFormica polyctena-Functional morphology of a hymenopteran eye. In: Information processing in the visual systems of arthropods, ed. R. Wehner, p. 37–49. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972Google Scholar
  24. Menzel, R.: Colour receptors in insects. In: The compound eye and vision of insects, ed. G. A. Horridge Oxford: University Press. In press (1973)Google Scholar
  25. Miller, W. H., Snyder, A. W.: Optical function of human peripheral cones. In Press Vision Res. (1973)Google Scholar
  26. Mote, M. I., Goldsmith, T. H.: Compound eyes: Localisation of two color receptors in the same ommatidium. Science171, 1254–1255 (1971)Google Scholar
  27. Ninomiya, N., Tominaga, Y., Kuwabara, M.: The fine structure of the compound eye of a damsel-fly. Z. Zellforsch.98, 17–32 (1969)Google Scholar
  28. Perrelet, A.: The fine structure of the retina of the honey bee drone. An electron microscopical study. Z. Zellforsch.108, 530–562 (1970)Google Scholar
  29. Perrelet, A., Baumann, F.: Evidence for extracellular space in the rhabdome of the honey bee drone eye. J. Cell Biol.40, 825–830 (1969)Google Scholar
  30. Scholes, J. H.: Discontinuity of the excitation process in locust visual cells. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.30, 517–527 (1965)Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, S. R.: Interreceptor coupling in ommatidia of drone honey bee and locust compound eyes. Vision Res.9, 999–1030 (1969a)Google Scholar
  32. Shaw, S. R.: Sense-cell structure and interspecies comparisons of polarized-light absorption in arthropod compound eye. Vision Res.9, 1031–1040 (1969b)Google Scholar
  33. Snyder, A. W.: Polarization sensitivity of individual retinula cells. J. comp. Physiol.83, 331–360 (1973a)Google Scholar
  34. Snyder, A. W.: Optical properties of invertebrate photoreceptors. In: The compound eye and vision of insects, ed. G. A. Horridge. Oxford: University Press. In press 1973bGoogle Scholar
  35. Snyder, A. W., Pask, C.: Spectral sensitivity of dipteran retinula cells. J. comp. Physiol.84, 59–76 (1973)Google Scholar
  36. Wald, G., Brown, P. K., Gibbons, I. R.: The problem of visual excitation. J. Opt. Soc. Am.53, 20–35 (1963)Google Scholar
  37. Walcott, B.: Unit studies on receptor movements in the retina ofLethocerus (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera). Z. vergl. Physiol.74, 17–25 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan W. Snyder
    • 1
  • Randolf Menzel
    • 2
    • 3
  • Simon B. Laughlin
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Advanced StudiesResearch School of Physical SciencesAustralia
  2. 2.Department of NeurobiologyResearch School of Biological Sciences Australian National UniversityCanberra
  3. 3.FB Biologie-Zoologie-THDarmstadtFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options