Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 154, Issue 5, pp 607–615

How bees analyse the polarization patterns in the sky

Experiments and model
  • Samuel Rossel
  • Rüdiger Wehner
Article

Summary

Polarized light from the blue sky exhibits an extensive pattern which in terms of both direction and degree of polarization is linked to the position of the sun (Fig. 1). Honeybees, among other animal species, are able to perceive skylight polarization and to use it as compass in both foraging flights and communication dances.
  1. 1.

    From our previous work it is known that bees orient by means of a simplified e-vector map when their view of the sky is restricted to single e-vector directions (Fig. 2). Nothing is known, however, regarding how navigating bees analyse the polarization pattern as a whole.

     
  2. 2.

    To study this, dancing bees were presented large parts of the natural e-vector patterns, and their orientation performance with respect to known feeding stations was analysed (Fig. 4A, 5A, 6A).

     
  3. 3.

    The results show that bees make mistakes, and these are consistent with the hypothesis that they invariably apply their simplified e-vector map to any polarization pattern they are exposed to (Figs. 3, 4B, 5B, 6B).

     
  4. 4.

    Based on these findings it is suggested that information processing in the bee's visual system does not elaborate a detailed image of the polarization patterns. Rather, it is hypothesized, a simplified version of the pattern, as the one deduced experimentally (Fig. 2), is determined and mimicked by the spatial layout of polarization analysers in the bee's retina (Fig. 7). For the model to work, the insect then has to rotate about its vertical body axis and in doing so perceives celestial polarization in the form of temporal brightness and/or colour modulations (Fig. 8).

     
  5. 5.

    It is explained how the bee could use these modulations to derive the orientation of the celestial sphere and subsequently the direction of the intended compass course.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernard GD, Wehner R (1977) Functional similarities between polarization vision and colour vision. Vision Res 17:1019–1028Google Scholar
  2. Brines ML, Gould JL (1982) Skylight polarization patterns and animal orientation. J Exp Biol 96:69–91Google Scholar
  3. Coulson KL, Dave JV, Sekera Z (1960) Tables related to radiation emerging from planetary atmosphere with really scattering. Univ Press, Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  4. Frisch K von (1949) Die Polarisation des Himmelslichtes als orientierender Faktor bei den Tänzen der Bienen. Experientia 5:142–148Google Scholar
  5. Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  6. Glas H van der (1975) Polarization induced colour patterns: a model of the perception of the polarized skylight by insects. I. Tests in choice experiments with running honey bees,Apis mellifera. Neth J Zool 25:476–505Google Scholar
  7. Glas H van der (1976) Polarization induced colour patterns: a model of the perception of the polarized skylight by insects. II. Experiments with direction trained dancing bees,Apis mellifera. Neth J Zool 26:383–413Google Scholar
  8. Glas H van der (1980) Orientation of bees,Apis mellifera, to unpolarized colour patterns, simulating the polarized zenith skylight pattern. J Comp Physiol 139:225–241Google Scholar
  9. Heiversen O von, Edrich W (1974) Der Polarisationsempfänger im Bienenauge: ein Ultraviolettrezeptor. J Comp Physiol 94:33–47Google Scholar
  10. Kirschfeld K (1972) Die notwendige Anzahl von Rezeptoren zur Bestimmung der Richtung des elektrischen Vektors linear polarisierten Lichtes. Z Naturforsch 27b:578–579Google Scholar
  11. Labhart T (1980) Specialized photoreceptors at the dorsal rim of the honeybee's compound eye: polarizational and angular sensitivity. J Comp Physiol 14:19–30Google Scholar
  12. Rossel S, Wehner R, Lindauer M (1978) E-vector orientation in bees. J Comp Physiol 125:1–12Google Scholar
  13. Rossel S, Wehner R (1982) The bee's map of the e-vector pattern in the sky. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:4451–4455Google Scholar
  14. Sekera Z (1956) Recent development in the study of the polarization of skylight. Adv Geophys 3:43–103Google Scholar
  15. Waterman TH (1981) Polarization sensitivity. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. VII/6B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 281–470Google Scholar
  16. Wehner R (1982) Himmelsnavigation bei Insekten. Neurophysiologie und Verhalten. Neujahrsbl Naturforsch Ges Zürich 194Google Scholar
  17. Wehner R (1983) The perception of polarized light. In: Cosens D, Vince-Prue D (eds). The biology of photoreceptors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge London, pp 331–369Google Scholar
  18. Wehner R, Bernard GD, Geiger E (1975) Twisted and nontwisted rhabdoms and their significance for polarization detection in the bee. J Comp Physiol 104:225–245Google Scholar
  19. Wehner R, Rossel S (1983) Polarized light navigation in bees: use of zenith and off-zenith e-vectors. Experientia 39:642Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Rossel
    • 1
  • Rüdiger Wehner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations