Marine Biology

, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp 465–471

Vertical and horizontal structure in the picoplankton communities of a coastal upwelling system

  • J. A. Hall
  • W. F. Vincent
Article

Abstract

The distribution of prokaryotic and eukaryotic picoplankton in the west coast upwelling-region off the South Island of New Zealand was investigated during midwinter (1988) the time of year when several commercially important fish species migrate into the region to breed. Picoplanktonic cells were major contributors to the autotrophic biomass, with > 80% of the particulate nitrogen and 39 to 55% of the total chlorophylla contained in the <2µm size-fraction. The prokaryotic picoplankton concentrations ranged from 6.3 × 105 to 2.1 × 107 cell l−1, and the eukaryotic picoplankton between 3.9 × 105 to 1.2 × 107 cells l−1. Picoplankton numbers increased with distance offshore to a maximum of ~ 3.0 × 107 cells l−1 at ~ 35 km from the coast, and then diminished towards the outer shelf and open ocean. The ratio of prokaryotic to eukaryotic cells varied between 1.01 and 4.71 in the mixed layer. Both groups declined substantially beneath the pycnocline, with no evidence of deep maxima. Prokaryotic cells dominated the planktonic cell concentrations at all but two stations, but eukaryotic cells dominated picoplankton biovolume as a result of their larger average cell size. The prokaryotic to eukaryotic picoplankton cell-number ratios in this system were considerably lower than often recorded elsewhere, and were inversely correlated with nitrate concentration. These observations show that a eukaryoticdominated picoplankton community makes a substantial contribution to autotrophic biomass in this nutrient-rich upwelling system, and may thereby play a major role in the food-web dynamics of this coastal fishery.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Booth, B. C. (1987). The use of autofluorescence for analyzing oceanic phytoplankton communities. Botanica mar. 30: 101–108Google Scholar
  2. Booth, B. C. (1988). Size classes and major taxonomic groups of phytoplankton at two locations in the subarctic Pacific Ocean in May and August, 1984. Mar. Biol. 97: 275–286Google Scholar
  3. Bradford, J. (1983). Physical and chemical oceanographic observations off Westland, New Zealand, June 1979. N.Z. Jl mar. Freshwat. Res. 17: 71–81Google Scholar
  4. Bradford, J. M., Chang, F. H. (1987). Standing stocks and productivity of phytoplankton off Westland, New Zealand, February 1982. N.Z. Jl mar. Freshwat. Res. 21: 71–90Google Scholar
  5. Chang, F. H., Vincent, W. F., Woods, P. H. (1989). Nitrogen assimilation by 3 size fractions of the winter phytoplankton off Westland, New Zealand. N.Z. Jl mar. Freshwat. Res. 23: 71–90Google Scholar
  6. Chisholm, S. W., Ilsen, R. J., Zettler, E.R, Goerecke, R., Waterbury, J. B., Welschmeyer, N. A. (1988). A novel free-living prochlorophyte abundant in the oceanic euphotic zone. Nature, Lond. 334: 340–344Google Scholar
  7. Cushing, D. H. (1989). A difference in structure between ecosystems in strongly stratified waters and in those that are only weakly stratified. J. Plankton Res. 11: 1–15Google Scholar
  8. Glover, H. E. (1985). The physiology and ecology of the marine cyanobacterial genusSynechococcus. Advances aquat. Microbiol. 3: 49–105Google Scholar
  9. Glover, H. E., Campbell, L., Prézelin, B. B. (1986). Contribution ofSynechococcus spp. to size-fractionated primary productivity in three water masses in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Biol. 91: 193–203Google Scholar
  10. Glover, H. E., Phinney, D. A., Yentsch, C. S. (1985a). Photosynthetic characteristics of picoplankton compared with those of larger phytoplankton populations in various water masses in the Gulf of Maine. Biol. Oceanogr. 3: 223–248Google Scholar
  11. Glover, H. E., Prézelin, B. B., Campbell, L., Wyman, M. (1988). Pico- and ultraplankton Sargasso Sea communities: variability and comparative distributions ofSynechococcus spp. and algae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 49: 127–139Google Scholar
  12. Glover, H. E., Smith, A. E., Shapiro, L. (1985b). Diurnal variations in photosynthetic rates: comparisons of ultraphytoplankton with a larger size fraction. J. Plankton Res. 7: 519–535Google Scholar
  13. Harris, G. P., Ganf, G. G., Thomas, D. P. (1987). Productivity, growth rates and cell size distribution of phytoplankton in the S. W. Tasman Sea: implications for carbon metabolism in the photic zone. J. Plankton Res. 9: 1003–1030Google Scholar
  14. Heath, R. A. (1982). What drives the mean circulation on the New Zealand west coast continental shelf? N.Z. Jl mar. Freshwat. Res. 16: 215–266Google Scholar
  15. Hurst, R. (1987). The 1987 West Coast hoki fishing season. Catch (N.Z. Minist. Agric. Fish.) 14 (10): 3–4Google Scholar
  16. Iturriaga, R., Mitchell, B. G. (1986) Chroococcoid cyanobacteria: a significant component in the food web dynamics of the open ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 28: 291–297Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, P. W., Sieburth, J. McN. (1979). Chroococcoid cyanobacteria in the sea: a ubiquitous and diverse phototrophic biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 928–935Google Scholar
  18. Joint, I. R. (1986). Physiological ecology of picoplankton in various oceanographic provinces. Can. Bull. Fish. aquat. Sciences 214: 287–309Google Scholar
  19. Joint, I. R., Pipe, R. K. (1984). An electron microscope study of a natural population of picoplankton from the Celtic Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 20: 113–118Google Scholar
  20. Kuosa, H. (1988). Occurrence of autotrophic picoplankton along an open sea — inner archipelago gradient in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Ophelia 28: 85–93Google Scholar
  21. Li, W. K. W., Subba Rao, D. V., Harrison, W. G., Smith, J. C., Cullen, J. J., Irwin, B., Platt, T. (1983). Autotrophic picoplankton in the tropical ocean. Science, N.Y. 219: 292–295Google Scholar
  22. Marchant, H. J., Davidson, A. T., Wright, S. W. (1987). The distribution and abundance of chroococcoid cyanobacteria in the Southern Ocean. In: Matsuda, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the National Institute of Polar Research Symposium on Polar Biology. Vol. 1. National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, p. 1–9Google Scholar
  23. Marchant, H. J., McEldowney, A. (1986). Nanoplanktonic siliceous cysts from Antarctica are algae. Mar. Biol. 92: 53–57Google Scholar
  24. Murphy, L. S., Haugen, E. M. (1985). The distribution and abundance of phototrophic ultraplankton in the North Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 47–58Google Scholar
  25. Stanton, B. R. (1971). Hydrology of Karamea Bight, New Zealand. N.Z. Jl mar. Freshwat. Res. 5: 141–163Google Scholar
  26. Stockner, J. G., Antia, N. J. (1986). Algal picoplankton from marine and freshwater ecosystems: a multidisciplinary perspective. Can. J. Fish. aquatic. Sciences 43: 2472–2503Google Scholar
  27. Takahashi, M., Kikuchi, K., Hara, Y. (1985). Importance of picocyanobacteria biomass (unicellular, blue-green algae) in the phytoplankton population of the coastal waters off Japan. Mar. Biol. 89: 63–69Google Scholar
  28. Tsuji, T., Yanagita, T. (1981). Improved fluorescent microscopy for measuring the standing stock of phytoplankton including fragile components. Mar. Biol. 64: 207–211Google Scholar
  29. Vincent, W. F., Chang, F. H., Cole, A., Downes, M. T., James, M. R., May, L. M., Moore, M., Woods, P. H. (1989). Short-term changes in planktonic community structure and nitrogen transfers in a coastal upwelling system. Estuar. cstl Shelf Sci. 29: 31–150Google Scholar
  30. Vincent, W.F., Downes, M. T. (1990). Microbial nitrogen transfers in a coastal upwelling system. In: Hattori, T., Ishida, Y., Maruyama, Y., Morita, R. Y., Uchida, A. (eds.) Recent advances in microbial ecology. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, p. 229–233Google Scholar
  31. Waterbury, J. B., Watson, S. W., Guillard, R. R. L., Brand, L. E. (1979). Widespread occurrence of a unicellular, marine, planktonic, cyanobacterium. Nature, Lond. 277: 293–294Google Scholar
  32. Wyman, M., Gregory, R. P. F., Carr, N. G. (1985). Novel role of phycoerythrin in the marine cyanobacteriumSynechococcus strain DC2. Science, N.Y. 230: 818–820Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Hall
    • 1
  • W. F. Vincent
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Botany/ZoologyMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Taupo Research LaboratoryDSIR Marine and FreshwaterTaupoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations