Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 158, Issue 2, pp 247–257 | Cite as

Ontogeny of sounds in the echolocating batHipposideros speoris

  • J. Habersetzer
  • G. Marimuthu
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    YoungHipposideros speoris emit multiharmonic sounds in groups of three to four notes. Newborns emit a relatively uniform pattern of FM- and FM/CF/FM-sounds. From ten days of age onwards the initial sound (first note) of a group is a FM-sound whereas the successive ones are CF/FM-sounds of consistently higher frequencies. At prevolant and volant stages of the bat's development most of the sound energy is concentrated in the second harmonic which is raised to the frequency range of the adults' CF/FM-sounds (127–138 kHz). Subsequently other harmonics disappear.

     
  2. 2.

    Harmonic components are suppressed or filtered out when they fall in a frequency range of approximately 65–75 kHz. This was found for bats of different ages regardless which fundamental frequency the suppressed harmonic components corresponded to, indicating a mechanical filtering process. These measurements coincide with the absence of the first harmonics in the same frequency range in the sounds of adults.

     
  3. 3.

    Temporal sound emission patterns were measured for bats of different ages. There was an increase in sound duration and an increase in the number of sounds (notes) per group as the bat matured to adulthood.

     
  4. 4.

    The sound emission of juveniles aids mothers in finding their young ones. Mothers located their infants even when the juveniles were displaced far from where they were left behind by their mothers. Behavioral experiments under both natural and captive conditions showed that the sound emission of young ones attracts mothers but do not give sufficient cues to allow the mother to discriminate their own from a group of young.

     
  5. 5.

    The ontogeny of the two types of sounds (CF/FM and complex harmonic FM) of adultHipposideros speoris is discussed and compared with the vocalisations of other bat species.

     

Abbreviations

CF

constant frequency

FM

frequency modulated

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown PE, Grinnell AD (1980) Echolocation ontogeny in bats. In: Busnel R-G, Fish JF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 355–377Google Scholar
  2. Gould E (1971) Studies of maternal-infant communication and development of vocalizations in the batsMyotis andEptesicus. Commun Behav Biol 5:263–313Google Scholar
  3. Gould E (1975a) Neonatal vocalizations in bats of eight genera. J Mammal 56:15–29Google Scholar
  4. Gould E (1975b) Experimental studies of the ontogeny of ultrasonic vocalizations in bats. Dev Psychobiol 8:333–346Google Scholar
  5. Gould E (1979) Neonatal vocalizations often species of Malaysian bats (Megachiroptera and Microchiroptera). Am Zool 19:481–491Google Scholar
  6. Grinnell AD, Hagiwara S (1972) Adaptations of the auditory nervous system for echolocation. Z Vergl Physiol 76:41–81Google Scholar
  7. Habersetzer J (1981) Adaptive echolocation sounds in the batRhinopoma hardwickei. A field study. J Comp Physiol 144:559–566Google Scholar
  8. Habersetzer J (1985) Flügelmorphologische Untersuchungen an einer Fledermausgesellschaft in Madurai. In: Nachtigall W (ed) BIONA reports 5: Bat flight — Fledermausflug. Publ Akad Wiss Lit Mainz, Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 86–106Google Scholar
  9. Habersetzer J, Schuller G, Neuweiler G (1984) Foraging behaviour and Doppler shift compensation in echolocating hipposiderid bats,Hipposideros bicolor andHipposideros speoris. J Comp Physiol A 155:559–567Google Scholar
  10. Jones C (1967) Growth, development, and wing loading in the evening bat,Nycticeius humeralis (Rafinesque). J Mammal 48:1–19Google Scholar
  11. Kay L, Pickvance TJ (1963) Ultrasonic emissions of the lesser horseshoe batRhinolophus hipposideros (Bech). Proc Zool Soc Lond 141:163–172Google Scholar
  12. Konstantinov AI (1973) Development of echolocation in bats in postnatal ontogenesis. Period Biol 75:13–19Google Scholar
  13. Kulzer E (1962) Über die Jugendentwicklung der Angola-BulldogfledermausTadarida (Mops) condylura (A Smith 1833) (Mollossidae). Säugetierkundl Mitt 10:116–124Google Scholar
  14. Matsumura S (1979) Mother-infant communication in a horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon): development of vocalization. J Mammal 60:76–84Google Scholar
  15. Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation and adaptivity to ecological constraints. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Akad Wiss Mainz, pp 280–302Google Scholar
  16. Neuweiler G, Bruns V, Schuller G (1980) Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68:741–753Google Scholar
  17. Neuweiler G, Singh S, Sripathi K (1984) Audiograms of a South Indian bat community. J Comp Physiol A 154:133–142Google Scholar
  18. Novick A (1958) Orientation in Paleotropical bats. I. Microchiroptera. J Exp Zool 138:81–154Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt U (1972) Die sozialen Laute juveniler Vampirfledermäuse (Desmodus rotundus) und ihrer Mütter. Zool Beitr 23:310–316Google Scholar
  20. Schuller G (1980) Hearing characteristics and Doppler shift compensation in South Indian CF-FM bats. J Comp Physiol 139:349–356Google Scholar
  21. Turner D, Shaughnessy A, Gould E (1972) Individual recognition between mother and infant bats (Myotis). In: Galler SR et al. (eds) Animal orientation and navigation. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA SP-262, Washington, DC, pp 365–371Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Habersetzer
    • 1
  • G. Marimuthu
    • 2
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut SenckenbergFrankfurt am MainFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.School of Biological Sciences, Indo-German Project an Animal BehaviourMadurai Kamaraj UniversityMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations