Sozial- und Präventivmedizin

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 357–360

The crucial role of definition in perinatal epidemiology

  • Gabriel Duc
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cross KW. Cost of preventing retrolental fibroplasia. Lancet 1973;2:954.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gourbin C, Masuy-Strooband G. Are Live and Stillbirths Comparable all Over Europe? Legal definitions and vital registration data processing. Edition Academia, Working Paper no170, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nations Unies: Manuel des statistiques de l'état civil. Etudes méthodologiques. Série F 7;359:1955.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OMS: Manuel de la classification internationale des maladies, traumatismes et causes de décès. Genève 1977.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tenth Revision 1993;2:129–133.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keirse MJNC. Perinatal mortality rates do not contain what they purport to contain. Lancet 1984;i:1166–1169.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    British Births 1970. vol. I. The first week of life. London: William Heinemann 1975:252–253.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Statistische Berichte. Totgeburten und Säuglingssterblichkeit in der Schweiz 1982–1985. Bundesamt für Statistik. Heft 14 Gesundheit 1990; 49.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mugford M. A comparison of reported differences in definitions of vital events and statistics. World Health Statistics Quarterly 1983;36:201–212.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Duc
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für NeonatologieUniversitätsspitalZürich

Personalised recommendations