Journal of Community Health

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Physician assistant graduates: Factors related to rural-urban practice location

  • Gerry A. Gairola
Articles

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of selected individual and background characteristics and values of physican assistant (PA) graduates on practice location. Information was gathered through a survey of graduates practicing as physician assistants from the first four classes of the University of Kentucky's Clinical Associate Program. No significant differences were found in rural-urban practice location by examining sociodemographic characteristics of graduates or residential background of graduates and their spouses. The only exception was that female graduates tended to practice in urban locations more than did male graduates. However, differences were found between rural- and urban-based graduates in the importance they placed on selected characteristics of communities.

Keywords

Public Health Health Promotion Disease Prevention Sociodemographic Characteristic Background Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For a review of studies see Lawrence D: Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners: Their Impact on Health Care Access, Costs, Quality.Health and Medical Service Review 1–12, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scheffler RM, Stinson OD: Characteristics of physician's assistants: A focus on specialty.Medical Care 12:1019–1030, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Profile of the Physician Assistant Profession, 1978 and Profile of Physician Assistant Students, 1978. Association of Physician Assistant Programs, Arlington, Virginia, October, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobmeyer TW, et al:A Report of a 1972 Survey of Physician's Assistant Training Programs. Minneapolis, InterStudy, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lawrence D, Wilson WM, and Castle CH: Employment of MEDEX Graduates and Trainees: Five-year Progress Report of the United States.JAMA 234:174–177, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bible BL: Physician views of medical practice in nonmetropolitan communities.Pub Hea Rep 85:11–17, 1971. Parker RS and Tuxill RG: The Attitudes of Physicians to Small Communities.Hospitals 34:49–51, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor M, et al: Medical Students; Attitudes Toward Rural Practice. Journal of Medical Education48:885–895, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charles ED: Location Preference of Physicians in Alabama.Alabama J Med Sci 11:35–39, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Champion DJ: Who Practices Where, and Why? Surprise in Appalachia.Med Op Rev 6:26–29, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mawardi BH: Styles of Practice of Female Physicians. InProceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education Association of American Medical Colleges 1977, 1227–230.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerry A. Gairola

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations