Human Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 469–483 | Cite as

Looking back on Goffman: The excavation continues

  • James J. Chriss
Review Essay

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahams, Roger D. (1984). Goffman reconsidered: Pros and players.Raritan 3(4): 76–94.Google Scholar
  2. Agger, B. (1989).Socio(onto)logy: A disciplinary reading. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, P. (1989). Goffman's poetics.Human Studies 12: 59–76.Google Scholar
  4. Auer, P. (1991). Review of Drew and Wootton (Eds.),Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Linguistics 29(1): 177–189.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Alton L. (1984). Goffman's animated language game.Raritan 3(4): 95–112.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, B.M. (1973). A fan letter on Erving Goffman.Dissent 20: 353–361.Google Scholar
  7. Bock, P.K. (1988). The importance of Erving Goffman to psychological anthropology.Ethos 16(1): 3–20.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, R.H. (1977).A poetic for sociology: Toward a logic of discovery for the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, R.H. (1990). Rhetoric, textuality, and the postmodern turn in sociological theory.Sociological Theory 8(2): 188–197.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, T. (1992).Erving Goffman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Callan, H. (1970).Ethology and society: Toward an anthropological view. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cheal, D.J. (1988a). The postmodern origin of ritual.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8(3): 269–290.Google Scholar
  13. Cheal, D.J. (1988b). Relationships in time: Ritual, social structure, and the life course.Studies in Symbolic Interaction 9: 83–109.Google Scholar
  14. Chriss, J.J. (1992). The construction of general sociological theory: From Parsons to Goffman... and beyond. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 23 August 1992.Google Scholar
  15. Chriss, J.J. (1993). Durkheim's cult of the individual as civil religion: Its appropriation by Erving Goffman.Sociological Spectrum 13(2): 251–275.Google Scholar
  16. Clough, P.T. (1992).The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, R. (1975).Conflict sociology: Towards an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Collins, R. (1980). Erving Goffman and the development of modern social theory. In J. Ditton,The view from Goffman, pp. 170–209. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  19. Collins, R. (1986). The passing of intellectual generations: Reflections on the death of Erving Goffman.Sociological Theory 4: 106–113.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, R. and Makowsky, M. (1972).The discovery of society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  21. Conein, B. (1992). Ethologie et sociologie: Contribution de L'ethologie à la theorie de l'interaction sociale.Revue Française de Sociologie 33(1): 87–104.Google Scholar
  22. Denzin, N.K. and Keller, C.M. (1981).Frame analysis reconsidered.Contemporary Sociology 10(1) 52–60.Google Scholar
  23. Denzin, N.K. (1991). Representing lived experiences in ethnographic texts.Studies in Symbolic Interaction 12: 59–70. Press.Google Scholar
  24. Drew, P. and Wootton, A. (1988).Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  25. Erwin, Robert (1992). The nature of Goffman.Centennial Review 36(2): 327–342.Google Scholar
  26. Freidson, E. (1983). Celebrating Erving Goffman.Contemporary Sociology 12(4): 359–362.Google Scholar
  27. Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Goffman, E. (1953). Communication conduct in an island community. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor-Doubleday.Google Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1961a).Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  31. Goffman, E. (1961b). Fun in games. InEncounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction, pp. 15–81. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  32. Goffman, E. (1963a).Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. (1963b).Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Goffman, E. (1967). Where the action is. InInteraction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior, pp. 149–270. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  35. Goffman, E. (1971).Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. Goffman, E. (1974).Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Goffman, E. (1979).Gender advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  38. Goffman, E. (1981a).Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  39. Goffman, E. (1981b). A reply to Denzin and Keller.Contemporary Sociology 10(1): 60–68.Google Scholar
  40. Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order.American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.Google Scholar
  41. Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 18(2): 123–132.Google Scholar
  42. Gonos, G. (1977). “Situation” versus “frame”: The “interactionist” and the “structuralist” analyses of everyday life.American Sociological Review 42: 854–867.Google Scholar
  43. Gouldner, A. W. (1969). Personal reality, social theory, and the tragic dimension in science. In G. Boalt,The sociology of research, pp. xv-xxxviii. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hazelrigg, L. (1992). Reading Goffman's framing as provocation of a discipline.Human Studies 15(2–3): 239–264.Google Scholar
  45. Hymes, D. (1984). On Erving Goffman.Theory and Society 13(5): 621–631.Google Scholar
  46. Lofland, J. (1980). Early Goffman: Style, structure, substance, soul. In J. Ditton,The view from Goffman, pp. 24–51. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lofland, J. (1984). Erving Goffman's sociological legacies.Urban Life 13(1): 7–34.Google Scholar
  48. Lyman, S.M. (1991). Animal faith, puritanism, and the Schutz-Gurwitsch debate: A commentary.Human Studies 14(2–3): 199–206.Google Scholar
  49. MacCannell, D. (1983). Erving Goffman (1922–1982).Semiotica 45(1/2): 1–33.Google Scholar
  50. Manning, Philip (1992).Erving Goffman and modern sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Marx, G.T. (1984). Role models and role distance: A remembrance of Erving Goffman.Theory and Society 13(5): 649–662.Google Scholar
  52. McGregor, G. (1986). A view from the fort: Erving Goffman as Canadian.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 4: 531–543.Google Scholar
  53. Miller, D.L. (1982). Ritual in the work of Durkheim and Goffman: The link between the macro and the micro.Humanity and Society 6: 122–134.Google Scholar
  54. Mitchell, J.N. (1978).Social exchange, dramaturgy and ethnomethodology: Toward a paradigmatic synthesis. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  55. Pages-Delon, M. (1985). Elements pour une typologie des situations sociales de mise en jeu de l'apparence corporelle.Revue de l'Institut de Sociologie, (3–4): 487–496.Google Scholar
  56. Posner, J. (1978). Erving Goffman: His presentation of self.Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8: 67–78.Google Scholar
  57. Rawls, A.W. (1987). The interaction ordersui generis: Goffman's contribution to social theory.Sociological Theory 5(2): 136–149.Google Scholar
  58. Riggins, S. (Ed.) (1990).Beyond Goffman: Studies on communication, institution, and social interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  59. Sebeok, T.A. (1991).American signatures: Semiotic inquiry and method. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  60. Seidman, S. (1991). The end of sociological theory: The postmodern hope.Sociological Theory 9(2) 131–146.Google Scholar
  61. Seidman, S. (1992). Postmodern social theory as narrative with a moral intent. In S. Seidman and D.G. Wagner (Eds.),Postmodernism and social theory, pp. 47–81. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Stein, M. (1991). Sociology and the prosaic.Sociological Inquiry 61(4): 421–433.Google Scholar
  63. Strong, P.M. (1983). The importance of being Erving: Erving Goffman, 1922–1982.Sociology of Health and Illness 5(3): 345–355.Google Scholar
  64. Travers, A. (1992). The conversion of self in everyday life.Human Studies 15(2–3): 169–238.Google Scholar
  65. Turner, J.H. (1989). Introduction: Can sociology be a cumulative science? In J.H. Turner (Ed.),Theory building in sociology, Pp. 8–18. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Turner, J.H. (1991). Dramaturgical theory: Erving Goffman. In J.H. Turner,The structure of sociological theory, 5th ed., pp. 447–471. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  67. Vester, H. (1989). Erving Goffman's sociology as a semiotics of postmodern culture.Semiotica 76(3/4): 191–203.Google Scholar
  68. Vine, I. (1975). Territoriality and the spatial regulation of interaction. In A. Kendon, R.M. Harris and M.R. Key (Eds.),Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction, pp. 357–387. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  69. Williams, R. (1983). Sociological tropes: A tribute to Erving Goffman.Theory, Culture and Society 2: 99–102.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, S.J. (1986). Appraising Goffman.British Journal of Sociology 37(3): 348–369.Google Scholar
  71. Winkin, Y. (1988). frErving Goffman: Portrait du sociologue en jeune homme. In Y. Winkin (Ed.),Erving Goffman: Les moments et leurs hommes, pp. 13–92. Paris: Editions Seuil.Google Scholar
  72. Winkin, Y. (1991). Erving Goffman: Outline of an intellectual biography. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  73. Wollheim, R. (1984).The thread of life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • James J. Chriss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations