Human Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 89–106 | Cite as

“mother is not holding competely respect”: Making social sense of schizophrenic writing

  • Keith Doubt
  • Maureen Leonard
  • Laura Muhlenbruck
  • Sherry Teerlinck
  • Dana Vinyard
Article

Abstract

This paper provides a phenomenological account of the writing of a young woman diagnosed with schizophrenia. The method of interpretation is to put ourselves in the place of the author drawing upon a combination of sympathy, reason, common-sense, experience, and “an intersubjective world, common to us all” (Schutz, 1945: 536). The result is the recognition of the person as also capable of putting herself in the place of others so as to understand their behavior. This “role-taking success” identifies the limits of the current sociological understanding of insanity's significance in social interaction as an instance of “role-taking failure” (Rosenberg, 1992).

The very appearance of a piece of writing often permits one to recognize the presence of schizophrenia. The use of space may be quite bizarre. The varying margins betray the writer's changing mood. The letter may start at the bottom or side of the paper or very close to the top ....

Capital letters and all letters are employed without any apparent rules, the former even in the middle of a word. (Bleuler, 1950: 159)

What we want to understand is not something hidden behind the text, but something disclosed in front of it. (Ricoeur, 1971: 557)

Why do we need an art of guessing? Why do we have to “construe” the meaning? Not only — as I tried to say a few years ago — because language is metaphorical and because the double meaning of metaphorical language requires an art of deciphering which tends to unfold the several layers of meaning.... [But also] because [a text] is not a mere sequence of sentences, all on an equal footing and separately understandable. A text is a whole, a totality. (Ricoeur, 1971: 548)

Keywords

Schizophrenia Social Interaction Young Woman Political Philosophy Capital Letter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreason, N. (1984).The broken brain: The biological Revolution in Psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1972)Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
  3. Baur, S. (1991).The dinosaur man: Tales of madness and enchantment from the back ward. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  4. Bellah, R.N., Madsen R., Sullivan, W., Swidler A. and Tipton, S. (1985).Habits of the heart. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  5. Bleuler, E. (1950).Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenias. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, A. (1982). Victim, patient, client, pariah: Steps in the self-understanding of the experience of suffering and affliction.Reflections: Canadian Journal of Visual Impairment 1:64–82.Google Scholar
  7. Blum, A. and McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives.American Sociological Review 36: 98–109.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, M. (1978).Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  9. Burke, K. (1989).On symbols and society. Ed. J. Gusfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chaika, E.O. (1990).Understanding psychotic speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, D. (1978).The language of madness. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Doubt, K. (1990). A theoretical note on Simmel's concept of acquaintance.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20(3): 265–276.Google Scholar
  13. Doubt, K. (1992). Mead's theory of self and schizophrenia.Social Science Journal 29(3): 307–321.Google Scholar
  14. Doubt, K. (1994). A Burkean hermeneutics for understanding the social character of schizophrenic language.Symbolic Interaction 17(2): 129–146.Google Scholar
  15. Forrest, D. (1969). New words and neologisms: With a thesaurus of coinages by a schizophrenic savant.Psychiatry 32 44–73.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1965).Madness and civilization. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1989).Mental illness and psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  20. Goffman, E. (1961).Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1967).Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  22. Gottesman, I. (1991).Schizophrenia genesis: The origins of madness. New York W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. Grubium, J. and Holstein, J. (1990).What is family? London: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. Kreisman, J. and Straus, H. (1989).I hate you — don't leave me: Understanding the border-line personality. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  25. Laing, R.D. (1969).The divided self. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  26. McHugh, P. (1970). A common-sense conception of deviance. In J. Douglas (Ed.),Deviance and respectability: The social construction of moral meanings. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D.C. and Blum, A.F. (1974).On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  28. Mead, G.H. (1934).Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Meynell, H. (1971). Philosophy and schizophrenia.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2(2): 17–30.Google Scholar
  30. Mills, C.W. (1940). Situated action and vocabularies of motive.American Sociological Review 5: 904–913.Google Scholar
  31. Ribeiro, B.T. (1994).Coherence in psychotic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ricoeur, P. (1971). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text.Social Research 38: 529–562.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenau, P.M. (1992).Post-modernism and the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenburg, M. (1992).The unread mind: Unraveling the mystery of madness. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
  35. Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities.Philosophy and Phenomenlogical Research 5: 533–576.Google Scholar
  36. Schutz, A. (1962). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.),Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  37. Sluzki, C. and Ransom, D. (1976).Double bind: The foundation of the communicational approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  38. Strauss, J.S. (1991). The person with delusions.British Journal of Psychiatry 159 (suppl. 14): 57–61.Google Scholar
  39. Torrey, E.F. (1988).Surviving schizophrenia: A family manual. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (1947).The theory of social and economic organization, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wolcott, R.H. (1974). Schizophrenese: A private language.Journal of Health and Social Behavior 15: 126–134.Google Scholar
  42. Wrobel, J. (1990).Language and schizophrenia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Doubt
    • 1
  • Maureen Leonard
    • 1
  • Laura Muhlenbruck
    • 1
  • Sherry Teerlinck
    • 1
  • Dana Vinyard
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Social ScienceNortheast Missouri State UniversityKirksville

Personalised recommendations