Human Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 109–130 | Cite as

Capta versus data: Method and evidence in communicology

  • Richard L. Lanigan


Political Philosophy Modern Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, H.G. (1988).The language and logic of philosophy. Lanham, NY: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  2. Bühler, K. (1934/1990).Theory of language: The representational function of language. Foundations of Semiotics, Vol. 25. Trans. D.F. Goodwin. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  3. Corner, J. and Hawthorn, J. (Eds.) (1989).Communication studies: An introductory reader. 3rd ed. London and New York: Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Hawking, S. (1988).A brief history of time: From the big bang to black holes. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  5. Kaelin, E.F. and Schrag, C.O. (Eds.). (1989).American phenomenology: Origins and developments. Analecta Husserliana, Vol. 26. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. King, B. (1992). Semiotic determinism and the photographic sign: Towards a theory of textual determinism after post-structuralism. Paper presented at the meeting of the Commission on Semiotics and Communication, Speech Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Kristeva, J. (1989).Language, the unknown: An initiation into linguistics. Trans. A.M. Menke. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lanigan, R.L (1977).Speech act phenomenology. The Hague and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Lanigan, R.L. (1988).Phenomenology of communication: Merleau-Ponty's thematics in communicology and semiology. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lanigan, R.L. (1991).Speaking and semiology: Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological theory of existential communication. 2nd ed. Approaches to Semiotics, Vol. 22. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Lanigan, R.L. (1992).The human science of communicology: A phenomenology of discourse in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lanigan, R.L. (1994, in press). A good rhetoric is possible: Ricoeur's philosophy of language as a phenomenology of discourse in the human sciences. In L.E. Hahn (Ed.),Paul Ricoeur. The Library of Living Philosophers. Peru, IL: The Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  13. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969).The raw and the cooked: Introduction to a science of mythology: Vol. I. Trans. J. and D. Weightman. New York: Harper Torchbooks; Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Luria, A.R. (1976).Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Trans. M. Lopez-Morillas and L. Solotaroff. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964).Signs. Trans. R.C. McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Perss.Google Scholar
  16. Ricoeur, P. (1977). Phenomenology and the social sciences.The Annals of Phenomenological Sociology 2: 145–159.Google Scholar
  17. Sobchack, V. (1992).The address of the eye: A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Spiegelberg, H. (1982).The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction. Phaenomenologica, Vol. 5/6. 3rd revised and enlarged ed. with the collaboration of K. Schuhmann. The Hague and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Wilden, A. (1987).The Rules are no game: The strategy of communication. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Lanigan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Speech CommunicationSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondale

Personalised recommendations