Advertisement

Journal of behavioral assessment

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 23–41 | Cite as

Methodological and theoretical issues in neuropsychological assessment

  • Gerald Goldstein
Article

Abstract

While there are philosophical and theoretical differences between neuropsychologists and behavior therapists, it is suggested that a significant reconciliation can be achieved in regard to assessment and treatment of the brain-damaged patient. While brain damage is often viewed as an irreversible disorder, there is evidence that substantial recovery of function can occur, particularly when adequate retraining is provided. There are practical and empirical considerations that suggest that neuropsychological tests are currently the best tools available for behavioral assessment of brain-damaged patients. However, the results of these tests can be used not only diagnostically but also to identify target behavioral deficits that may be rehabilitated through systematic retraining efforts. Such rehabilitation efforts can be optimally planned, implemented, and evaluated through an alliance between the neuropsychologist, who identifies the ability and deficit pattern, and the behavior therapist, who devises and evaluates the retraining program. It is possible that the successes of behavior therapy in numerous clinical and educational applications can be repeated in the cases of brain-damaged patients. However, such success would appear to be contingent on appreciation of the high degree of specificity often seen in neurological deficit patterns and the great complexities involved in the relationships between brain function and behavior.

Key words

neuropsychology rehabilitation planning recovery methodology behavior theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, S. J.Rorschach's test. Vol. I:Basic processes. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1944.Google Scholar
  2. Bellack, A. S., & Hersen, M. Assessment and single-case research. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.),Behavior therapy in the psychiatric setting. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Bender, L. A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use.Research Monographs of the American Orthopsychiatric Association, 1938,3.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Gerstman, L., & Gordon, W. Relationship between initial competence and ability to profit from cues in brain damaged individuals.Journal Abnormal Psychology 1970,75 248–259. (a)Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., & Mandleberg, I. The ability to profit from cues as a function of initial competence in normal and brain-injured adults: A replication of previous findings.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1970,76 378–379. (b)Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Yishay, Y., Diller, L., Mandleberg, I., Gordon, W., & Gerstman, L. J. Similarities and differences in block design performance between older normal and brain-injured persons.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1971,78 17–25.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Yishay, Y., Gerstman, L., Diller, L., & Haas, A. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes from psychometric parameters in left hemiplegics.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1970,34 436–441.Google Scholar
  8. Boring, E. G. The use of operational definitions in science.Psychological Review 1945,52 243–245.Google Scholar
  9. Broca, P. (New observation of aphemia produced by a lesion of the posterior half of the second and third frontal convolutions.)Société Anatomique de Paris 1861,36 398–407.Google Scholar
  10. Butters, N., & Cermak, L. S. Neuropsychological studies of alcoholic Korsakoff patients. In G. Goldstein & C. Neuringer (Eds.),Empirical Studies of Alcoholism. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Christensen, A. L.Luria's neuropsychological investigation. New York: Spectrum, 1975. (a)Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, A. L.Luria's neuropsychological investigation: Manual. New York: Spectrum, 1975. (b)Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, A. L.Luria's neuropsychological investigation: Test cards. New York: Spectrum, 1975. (c)Google Scholar
  14. Diller, L. A model for cognitive retraining in rehabilitation.The Clinical Psychologist 1976,29 13–15.Google Scholar
  15. Diller, L., Buxbaum, J., & Chiotelis, S. Relearning motor skills in hemiplegia: Error analysis.Genetic Psychology Monographs 1972,85 249–286.Google Scholar
  16. Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E.Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
  17. Golden, C. J.Diagnosis and rehabilitation in clinical neuropsychology. Springfield, Ill.: C. C Thomas, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. Golden, C. J., Hammeke, T. A., & Purisch, A. D. Diagnostic validity of a standardized neuropsychological battery derived from Luria's neuropsychological tests.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978,46 1258–1265.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, K.The organism. New York: American Book Co., 1939.Google Scholar
  20. Halstead, W. C.Brain and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  21. Hebb, D. O. Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review 1955,62 243–254.Google Scholar
  22. Hebb, D. O. Alice in Wonderland or psychology among the biological sciences. In H. F. Harlow & C. N. Woolsey (Eds.),Biological and biochemical bases of behavior. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  23. Hefferline, R. F. Learning theory and clinical psychology — an eventual symbiosis. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.),Experimental foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1962.Google Scholar
  24. Hersen, M. Token economies in institutional settings. Historical, political, deprivation, ethical and generalization issues.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1976,162 206–211.Google Scholar
  25. Klove, H. Validation studies in adult clinical neuropsychology. In R. M. Reitan & L. H. Davison (Eds.),Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications. New York: Winston-Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  26. Koch, S. Clark L. Hull. In W. K. Estes, S. Koch, K. MacCorquodale, P. E. Meehl, C. G. Mueller, W. N. Schoenfeld, and W. S. Verplanck,Modern learning theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1954.Google Scholar
  27. Lashley, K. S. Integrative functions of the cerebral cortex.Physiological Review 1933,13 1–42.Google Scholar
  28. Luria, A. R.Restoration of function after brain injury. New York: Macmillan, 1963 (original in Russian published in 1948).Google Scholar
  29. Luria, A. R.The working brain. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  30. Luria, A. R., & Majovski, L. C. Basic approaches used in American and Soviet clinical neuropsychology.American Psychologist 1977,32 959–968.Google Scholar
  31. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. On a distion between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.Psychoogical Review 1948,55 95–107.Google Scholar
  32. Meier, M. J. Some challenges for clinical neuropsychology. In R. M. Reitan & L. A. Davison (Eds.),Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  33. Milner, B. Amnesia following operation on the temporal lobes. In C. W. M. Witty & O. L. Zangwill (Eds.),Amnesia. Woburn, Mass.: Butterworth, 1966.Google Scholar
  34. Milner, B., & Teuber, H.-L. Alteration of perception and memory in man: Reflections on methods. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.),Analysis of behavior change. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.Google Scholar
  35. Parsons, O. A. & Prigatano, G. P. Methodological considerations in clinical neuropsychological research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978,46 608–619.Google Scholar
  36. Piotrowski, Z. Personality studies of cases with lesions of the frontal lobes: II. Rorschach study of a Pick's Disease case.Rorschach Research Exchange 1936–1937,1 65–77.Google Scholar
  37. Pribram, K. H.Languages of the brain: Experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
  38. Pribram, K. H. Holographic memory.Psychology Today 1979,12 71–84.Google Scholar
  39. Reitan, R. M. Validity of the Rorschach Test as measure of psychological effects of brain damage.AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychology 1955,73 445–451.Google Scholar
  40. Russell, A., Neuringer, C., & Goldstein, G.Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1970.Google Scholar
  41. Skinner, B. F. Are theories of learning necessary?Psychological Bulletin 1950,57 193–216.Google Scholar
  42. Skinner, B. F.Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.Google Scholar
  43. Stein, D., Rosen, J., & Butters, N. (Eds.)Plasticity and recovery of function in the central nervous system. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  44. Teuber, H.-L. Some alterations in behavior after cerebral lesions in man.Evolution of nervous control. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1959.Google Scholar
  45. Wickelgren, W. A. Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks, configuring in conditioning, S-R versus cognitive learning, normal forgetting, the amnesic syndrome, and the hippocampal arousal system.Psychological Review 1979,86 44–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Goldstein
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Veterans Administration Medical CenterPittsburgh
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations