Journal of Community Health

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 37–51

Using lay health workers: Case study of a community-based prenatal intervention

  • Joel S. Meister
  • Louise H. Warrick
  • Jill G. de Zapién
  • Anita H. Wood
Articles

Abstract

This article reports on the design and implementation of a prenatal outreach and education intervention for low income, Hispanic women living in three migrant and seasonal farmworker communities in Arizona. The program included three major elements: a Spanish language prenatal curriculum; a group of mature Hispanic women recruited from the target communities and trained as “Comienzo Sano” (healthy beginning) Promotoras (health promoters), and the organization of a support network of local health professionals. The rationale for the demonstration is reviewed, and the structure of the intervention is described. Factors which facilitated and constrained implementation of the program are identified, and guidelines are provided for other health care providers and health educators interested in developing similar programs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arizona Department of Health Services, Division of Family Health Services.A Report on Prenatal Care, Low Birthweight and Infant Mortality, Phoenix, AZ 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meister, J, de Zapién, J, LaBrec, P. The Arizona Farmworker Health History and Data Base.Southwest Border Rural Health Research Center Working Paper No.2. Tucson, AZ. 1987, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Warrick, LH, Wood, AH, Meister, JS, de Zapien, JG. Evaluation of a Peer Health Worker Prenatal Outreach and Education Program for Hispanic Farmworker Families. Unpubl, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoff, W. Role of the community health aide in public health programs.Public Health Rep 84:998–1002, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahler, H. Promotion of primary health care in member countries of WHO.Int Health 93:107–113, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giblin, PT. Effective utilization and evaluation of indigenous health care workers.Public Health Rep 104:361–368, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westheimer, RK, Cattell, SH, Connell, E, Kaufman, SA, Swartz, DP. Use of paraprofessionals to motivate women to return for post partum checkup.Public Health Rep 85:625–635, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonzalez, JL, Woodward, LH. Expanding roles for health assistants in a model cities' health program.Health Serv Rep 89:145–151, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stewart, JC, Hood, WR. Using Workers from “hard-core” areas to increase immunization levels.Public Health Rep 85:177–185, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richter, RW, Bengen, B, Alsup, PA, Brunn, B, Kilkcoyne, MM, Challenor, BD. The community health worker: a resource for improved health care delivery.Am J Public Health 64:1056–1061, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D'Onofrio, CN. Aides — pain or panacea?Public Health Rep 85:788–801, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Domke, HR, Coffey, G. The neighborhood-based public health worker: additional manpower for public health services.Am J Public Health 56:603–608, 1966.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaughn, JP. Barefoot or professional? Community health workers in the third world.J Trop Med Hyg 83:3–10, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellin, LE, Killeen, M, Mazeika, JJ. Preparing public health subprofessionals recruited from the poverty group—lessons from an OEO work-study program.Am J Public Health 57:242–252, 1967.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conn, RH. Using health education aides in counselling pregnant women.Public Health Rep 83:979–982, 1968.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wingert, WA, Grubbs, J, Lenoski, EF, Friedman, DB. Effectiveness and efficiency of indigenous health aides in a pediatric outpatient department.Am J Public Health 65:849–857, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heath, AM. Health aides in health departments.Public Health Rep 82:608–614, 1967.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Callan, LB. Health education aide trainee project.Public Health Rep 84:459–464, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kent, JA, Smith, CH. Involving the urban poor in health services through accommodation—the employment of neighborhood representatives.Am J Public Health 57:997–1003, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martens, EG. Culture and communications—training Indians and Eskimos as community health workers.Am J Public Health 57:495–503, 1966.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cauffman, JG, Wingert, WA, Friedman, DB, Warburton, EA, Hanes, B. Community health aides: how effective are they?Am J Public Health 60:1904–1909, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heath, AM, Pelz, DR. Perception of functions of health aides by aides themselves and by others.Public Health Rep 85:767–772, 1970.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roberts, BJ, Mico, PR, Clark, EQ. An experimental study of two approaches to communication.Am J Public Health 53:1361–1381, 1963.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moore, FI, Stewart, JC. Important variables incluencing successful use of aides.Health Serv Rep 87:555–561, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Potts, D, Miller, CW. The community health aide.Nurs Outlook December:33–35, 1964.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Watkins, EL, Larson, KL, Harlan, C et al:Migrant Lay Health Advisors: Strategy for Health Promotion. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Department of Maternal and Child Health, 1988, pp. 8–77.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heins, HC, Nance, NW, Ferguson, JE. Social support in improving perinatal outcome: the resource mothers' program.Obstet Gynecol 70:263–266, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Warrick, L.Barriers to Prenatal Care, Maricopa County. Unpubl, 1986.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jasís, M:Creencias y Tradiciones sobre Salud Prenatal. Tijuana, Baja California: Centro de Estudios Fronterizos del Norte de Mexico, 1985, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fox, R. The medicalization and demedicalization of American society. In J. Knowles (Eds.)Doing Better and Feeling Worse. New York: W.W. Norton, 1975, Pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Remy, MJ.Arizona Rural Health Needs Assessment. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, 1988, Pp. 7–10, 34.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abrams, HK. The short handled hoe: ergonomics comes to the farmworker.Occupational Health and Safety News: 1–4, 1986.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coye, MJ. The health effects of agriculture production: the health of agriculture workers.J Public Health Policy Sept: 349–370, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilk, VA:The Occupational Health of Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers in the United States. 2nd ed. Washington: Farmworker Justice Fund, 1986, pp. 13–51.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Warrick, L:Evaluation of Un Comienzo Sano: Program Implementation and Families Served. Unpubl, 1988.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wood, A:The Lay Health Provider in Mexican-American Communities in Southern Arizona. Empowerment: Fact or Fiction? Unpubl, 1990.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gallagher, K, Gordon, I:Study of the availability of obstetrical and other primary care services in underserved Arizona. Report submitted to the president of the Arizona State Senate, speaker of the Arizona State House of Representatives and the governor of Arizona. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, 1990, Pp. 3–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel S. Meister
    • 1
  • Louise H. Warrick
  • Jill G. de Zapién
  • Anita H. Wood
  1. 1.Southwest Border Rural Health Research Center Department of Family and Community Medicine University of Arizona College of MedicineTucson

Personalised recommendations