Journal of behavioral assessment

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 265–279

Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues in the assessment of anxiety disorders

  • Samuel M. Turner
  • Larry Michelson
Article

Abstract

Many conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues remain unresolved in the assessment of anxiety disorders. Despite the prevalence, incidence, chronicity, and severity of anxiety disorders, research efforts and funding have fallen behind with regard both to other disorders and to addressing critical issues in the field. The primary objective of this paper is to provide a scientific critique regarding a number of often ignored yet salient considerations in anxiety-disorders assessment. Critical analyses of and recommendations regarding the multidimensional nature of anxiety, comorbidity, uniformity myths, synchrony, normative comparisons, psychometric properties of measures, and treatment integrity are offered. Finally, promising areas of clinical research are presented to enhance further the current understanding of the complexities inherent in assessing anxiety disorders.

Key words

anxiety assessment anxiety disorders methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1979). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H., & Wolfe, B. E. (1981). Behavioral approaches to anxiety disorders: A report on the NIMH-SUNY, Albany, Research Conference.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 448–454.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, E. S. (1972). Anxiety and impulsiveness: Toward a neuropsychological model. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.),Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. I, pp. 195–222). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borkovec, T. D., Weeits, T. C., & Bernstein, D. A. (1977). Assessment of anxiety. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhovn, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Carey, G., & Gottesman, I. I. (1981). Twin and family studies of anxiety, phobic and obsessive disorders. In D. F. Klein & J. G. Rabkin (Eds.),Anxiety: New research and changing concepts. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cattell & Scheier (1961).The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cerny, J. A., Himadi, W. G., & Barlow, D. H. (1984). Issues in diagnosing anxiety disorders.Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 6 301–329.Google Scholar
  9. Curran, J. P. (1977). Skills training as an approach to the treatment of heterosexual social anxiety: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 84 140–157.Google Scholar
  10. Hallam, R. S. (1978). Agoraphobia: A clinical review of the concept.British Journal of Psychiatry, 133 314–319.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton, M. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating.British Journal of Psychiatry, 32 50–55.Google Scholar
  12. Jacob, R. G., & Rapport, M. D. (1984). Panic disorder. In S. M. Turner (Ed.),Behavioral theories and treatment of anxiety (pp. 187–237). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jacob, R. G., Moller, M. B., Turner, S. M., & Wall, C. (in press). Otoneurological dysfunction in patients with panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic attacks.American Journal of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  14. Jorgesson, S. (1983). Genetic factors in anxiety disorders.Archives of General Psychiatry, 37 1289–1294.Google Scholar
  15. Lader, M. (1974). The peripheral and central role of the catecholamines in the mechanisms of anxiety.International Journal of Pharmopsychiatric Medicine, 9 125–137.Google Scholar
  16. Lang, P. J. (1977). Physiological assessment of anxiety and fear. In J. D. Cone & R. P. Hawkins (Eds.),Behavioral assessment (pp. 178–195). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  17. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition.American Psychologist, 39 124–129.Google Scholar
  18. Marinelli, R. P. (1980). Anxiety. In R. L. Woody (Ed.),Encyclopedia of clinical assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 575–588). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Mavissakalian, M., & Barlow, D. H. (Eds.). (1981).Phobia: Psychological and pharmacological treatment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mavissakalian, M., Turner, S., & Michelson, L. (1985). Future directions in the assessment and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. In M. Mavissakalian, S. M. Turner, & L. Michelson (Eds.),Psychological and pharmacological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (pp. 213–244). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  21. Michelson, L. (1984). The role of individual differences, response profiles, and treatment consonance in anxiety disorders.Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 6 349–368.Google Scholar
  22. Michelson, L., & Mavissakalian, M. (1983). Temporal stability of agoraphobia outcome measures.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21 695–698.Google Scholar
  23. Michelson, L., & Mavissakalian, M. (1985). Psychophysiological outcome of behavioral and pharmacological treatments of agoraphobia.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53 229–236.Google Scholar
  24. Michelson, L., Mavissakalian, M., Greenwald, D., Kornblith, S., & Greenwald, M. (1982). Cognitive behavioral treatment of agoraphobia. Paradoxical intentions vs. self statement training. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy.Google Scholar
  25. Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Weissman, M. M., Orvaschel, H., Gruenberg, E., Burke, J. D., Jr., & Regier, D. D. (1984). Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites.Archives of General Psychiatry, 41 949–958.Google Scholar
  26. Schalling, D., Cronholm, M., Asborg, M., & Espmark, S. (1973). Ratings of psychic and somatic anxiety indicants: Interrater reliability and relation to personality variables.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 49, 353–368.Google Scholar
  27. Sechrest, L., West, S. G., Phillips, M., Redner, R., & Yeaton, W. (1979). Some neglected problems in evaluation research: Strength and integrity of treatments. In L. Sechrestet al. (Eds.),Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 4). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.).Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 24–49). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970).The state-trait anxiety inventory: Test manual for form X. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  30. Spielberger, C. D., Pollans, C. H., & Worden, T. V. (1984). Anxiety disorders. In S. M. Turner & M. Hersen (Eds.),Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (pp. 263–300). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  31. Steketee, G., Foa, B. E., & Grayson, T. J. (1982). Recent advances in behavioral treatment of obsessive compulsives.Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 1365–1371.Google Scholar
  32. Torgersen, S. (1983). Genetic factors in anxiety disorders.Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1085–1089.Google Scholar
  33. Turner, S. M., Williams, S. L., Mezzich, J. E., & Beidel, D. C. (1984). Panic disorder and agoraphobia with panic attacks: Are they distinct diagnostic categories? Unpublished Manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., & Nathan, R. S. (1985). Biological factors in obsessive-compulsive disorders.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 430–450.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, S. M., McCann, B., & Mezzich, J. E. (1985). Patterns of responsiveness among anxiety disorders patients, Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, S. L., Turner, S. M., & Peer, D. F. (1985). Guided mastery and performance desensitization treatments for severe agoraphobia.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 237–247.Google Scholar
  37. Yeaton, W., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity and effectiveness.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 156–167.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel M. Turner
    • 1
  • Larry Michelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of MedicinePittsburgh

Personalised recommendations