Journal of Community Health

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 283–295 | Cite as

Factors which influence use of prenatal care in low-income racialethnic women in Los Angeles county

  • Ruth E. Zambrana
  • Christine Dunkel-Schetter
  • Susan Scrimshaw
Articles

Abstract

There is very limited information on ethnic differences in use of prenatal care services. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sociodemographic, health behaviors, medical risk, and psychosocial risk factors on the timing of prenatal care among Black-American, Mexican-American, and recent Mexican immigrant women in Los Angeles. A sample of 107 primiparous women were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Information obtained included socioeconomic indicators, relationship with baby's father, timing of prenatal care, psychosocial factors, and substance use before pregnancy. Ethnic patterns of timing of prenatal care revealed no significant differences. The relationship with the baby's father was associated with early timing of prenatal care and more prenatal care visits. Substance use before pregnancy was significantly related to total number of visits for this pregnancy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown, SS (Ed.):Prenatal care: Reaching mothers, reaching infants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ventura, SJ: National Center for Health Statistics. Births of Hispanic parentage 1983 and 1984. Monthly Vital Statistics Report. Hyattsville, MD:Public Health Service 36, Supp. (2), DHHS Pub. No. (PHS):1–18, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norris, FD, Williams, R, Perinatal outcomes among Medicaid recipients in California.Am J Public Health 74:1112–1117, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: The prevention of low birth weight. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    United States Department of Health and Human Services: Report of the secretary's task force on Black and minority health.Infant Mortality and Low Birth Weight 4, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bensacca, DB, Ellis, J, Martin, DG, Pettitti, DB, Factors associated with low birth weight in an inner-city population: The role of financial problems.Am J Public Health 77:505–506, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Combs-Orme, T:Social Work Practice in Maternal and Child Health. New York: Springer, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allan Guttmacher Institute:Blessed events and the bottom line: Financing maternity care in the United States. New York, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scribner, R, Dwyer, JH, Acculturation and low birthweight among Lations in the Hispanic HANES.Am J Public Health 79: 1263–1267, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neresian, WS, Infant mortality in socially vulnerable populations.Annu Rev Public Health 9, 361–77, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dowling, PT, Fisher, M, Maternal factors and birthweight infants: A comparison of Blacks with Mexican-Americans.J Fam Prac 25:153–158, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cortez, M: California's shadow population: The impact of undocumented immigrants from Latin America on state health and social service policies and programs. Prepared for the California Policy Seminar and the School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braverman, P, Oliva, G, Miller, MG, Reiter, R, Egerter, S, Adverse outcomes and lack of health insurance among newborns in an eight-county area of California, 1982 to 1986.N Eng J Med, 321:508–513, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown, ER, Valdez, RB, Morgenstern, H, Hafner, C: Californians without health insurance: A report to the California legislature. Los Angeles, California: University of California Policy Seminar Technical Assistance Project, UCLA School of Public Health, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chavez, LR, Cornelius, WA, Jones, OW, Utilization of health services by Mexican immigrant women in San Diego.Women and Health, 11, 3–20, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCarthy, KF, Valdez, RB: Current and future effects of Mexican immigration into California. RAND Corporation R-3365-CR, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayes-Bautista, DE, Schink, WO, Chapa, J.The burden of support: Young Latino population in aging American society. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Golding, JM: An integrated role restriction and stress approach to gender differences in depression. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Procidano, ME, Heller, K, Measures of perceived social support from friends and family: Three validation studies.Am J Commun Psych, 2, 1–24, 1983.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spielberger, CD, Gorsuch, RL, Lushene, RE:STAI Manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Cal: Consulting Psychologists, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spielberger, CD, Sharma, S: Cross-cultural measurement of anxiety. In CD Spielberger and R Diaz-Guerrero (Eds.),Cross-cultural Research on Anxiety. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere/Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Belloc, NB, Breslow, L, Relationship of physical health status and mortality.Prev Med, 2:67–81, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zambrana, RE, Hernandez, M, Dunkel-Schetter, C, Scrimshaw, S, Ethnic differences in substance use patterns of low-income minority women.J Fam and Commun Health,13, 1990.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vaux, A, Variations in Social Support Associated with gender, ethnicity and age.Journal of Social Issues, 41:89–110, 1985.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boone, MS, Social and cultural factors in the etiology of low birthweight among disadvantaged Blacks.Soc Sci Med, 20: 1001–1011, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth E. Zambrana
    • 1
  • Christine Dunkel-Schetter
  • Susan Scrimshaw
  1. 1.UCLA School of Social WelfareLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations