Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 331–367 | Cite as

Multirelational semantic maps

  • Judith G. Lambiotte
  • Donald F. Dansereau
  • David R. Cross
  • Sharon B. Reynolds
Article

Abstract

Research on multirelational semantic maps is laden with promise for educational applications, but the development of knowledge mapping systems has been largely unsystematic. This paper describes the distinctive features of knowledge maps, discusses their origins, and explores some of the strengths and weaknesses of the wide variety of maps and mapping approaches that have been appearing in the literature over the past several years. Research findings pertaining to maps' potential and actual uses in educational settings are summarized, with some indepth attention to the more programmatic efforts of Novak as well as to our own mapping system. Suggestions are made for future exploration of, and experimentation on, maps as unique tools for organizing, representing, and communicating a wide variety of knowledge domains.

Key words

semantic maps knowledge maps concept maps 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text.J. Educat. Res. 75: 44–48.Google Scholar
  2. Alvermann, D. (1986). Graphic organizers: Cuing devices for comprehending and remembering main ideas. In Baumann, J. F. (ed.),Teaching Main Idea Comprehension Newark, Delaware, International Reading Association, pp. 210–226.Google Scholar
  3. Alvermann, D. E., and Boothby, P. R. (1983). A preliminary investigation of the differences in children's retention of “inconsiderate” text.Read. Psychol. 4: 237–246.Google Scholar
  4. Alvermann, D. E., and Boothby, P. R. (1986). Children's transfer of graphic organizer instruction.Read. Psychol. 7: 87–100.Google Scholar
  5. Amlund, J. T., Gaffney, J., and Kulhavy, R. W. (1985). Map feature content and text recall of good and poor readers.J. Read. Behav. 17: 317–330.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. R., and Bower, G. H. (1973).Human Associative Memory. New York, Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Armbruster, B. B., and Anderson, T. J. (1984). Mapping: Representing informative text diagrammatically. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ausubel, D. P. (1968).Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  9. Ausubel, D. P. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics.Rev. Educat. Res. 48: 251–258.Google Scholar
  10. Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The Psychology of Memory. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Barron, R. F., and Schwartz, R. M. (1984). Graphic postorganizers: A spatial learning strategy. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Barron, R. F., and Stone, V. F. (1974). The effect of student-constructed graphic post organizers upon learning vocabulary relationships. In Nacke, P. L. (ed.),Interaction: Research and Practice for College-Adult Reading (NRC Yearbook 23), Clemson, South Carolina, National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  13. Bean, T. W., Sorter, J., Singer, H., and Frazee, C. (1986). Teaching students how to make predictions about events in history with a graphic organizer plus options guide.J. Read. May, 739–745.Google Scholar
  14. Bieger, G. R., and Glock, M. D. (1986). Comprehending spatial and contextual information in picture-text instructions.J. Exper. Educat. 54: 181–188.Google Scholar
  15. Boothby, P. R., and Alvermann, D. E. (1984). Classroom training study: The effects of graphic organizer instruction on fourth grader's comprehension.Read. World 23: 325–329.Google Scholar
  16. Bourne, L. E., Jr., Dominowski, R. L., and Loftus, E. F. (1979).Cognitive Processes. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Boyle, O. F. (1983). Mapping: A prewriting technique that works.Notes Plus: A Quarterly of Practical Teaching Ideas. Urbana, Illinois, National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  18. Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall.Canad. J. Psychol. 22: 349–368.Google Scholar
  19. Buzan, T. (1974).Using Both Sides of the Brain. New York, Dutton.Google Scholar
  20. Camperell, K., and Reeves, C. (1982). Effects of training junior college students to use networking techniques to understand and study technical texts. Presentation, 26th Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, October.Google Scholar
  21. Camperell, K., and Smith, L. L. (1982). Improving comprehension through the use of networking. Presentation, Southeastern Regional Conference of the International Reading Association, Biloxi, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  22. Caswell, R. M., and Helm, K. (1988). The use of mapping as a mediating strategy by poor readers to produce written summaries. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  23. Cleland, C. J. (1981). Highlighting issues in children's literature through semantic webbing.The Reading Teacher 34: 642–646.Google Scholar
  24. Cook, L. K., and Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text.J. Educat. Psychol. 80: 448–456.Google Scholar
  25. Dansereau, D. F., Collins, K. W., McDonald, B. A., Holley, C. D., Diekhoff, G., and Evans, S. H. (1979). Development and evaluation of an effective learning strategy training program.J. Educat. Psychol. 71: 64–73.Google Scholar
  26. Dansereau, D. F., and Holley, C. D. (1982). Development and evaluation of a text mapping strategy. In Flammer, A., and Kintsch, W. (eds.),Discourse Processing Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  27. Darch, C. B., Carnine, D. W., and Kameenui, E. J. (1986). The role of graphic organizers and social structure in content area instruction.J. Read. Behav. 18: 275–295.Google Scholar
  28. Davidson, J. L. (1982). The group mapping activity for instruction in reading and thinking.J. Read. 26: 52–56.Google Scholar
  29. Denner, P. R. (1986). Comparison of the effects of episodic organizers and traditional notetaking on story recall. Final Report grant no. 538, Idaho State University. ED 270 731.Google Scholar
  30. Draheim, M. E. (1983). Facilitating comprehension and written recall of exposition through DRTA instruction and conceptual mapping. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, Texas, November 29 to December 3. ED 246–406.Google Scholar
  31. Durfee, M. (1988). Writing with the students: Becoming a community of learners.Coll. Teach. 36: 12–15.Google Scholar
  32. Dwyer, F. M. (1978).Strategies for Improving Visual Learning. State College, Pennsylvania, Learning Services.Google Scholar
  33. Ellis, H. C. (1978).Fundamentals of Human Learning, Memory, and Cognition (2nd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa, Brown.Google Scholar
  34. Feifer, R. G., Dyer, M. G., and Baker, E. L. (1988).Learning Procedural and Declarative Knowledge. Montreal, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.Google Scholar
  35. Finke, R. A., and Shepard, R. N. (1986). Visual functions of mental imagery. In Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L., and Thomas, J. P. (eds.),Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. New York, Wiley, pp. 37ABET1 to 37–55.Google Scholar
  36. Fisher, K. M. (1988). Relations used in student-generated knowledge representations. Presentation, Symposium on Student Understanding in Science: Issues of Cognition and Curriculum; American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  37. Fisher, K. M., Faletti, J., Thornton, R., Patterson, H., Lipson, J., and Spring, C. (1987). Computer-based knowledge representation as a tool for students and teachers.Google Scholar
  38. Gillis, M. K. (1985). Strategies for mapping content texts. Paper based on a workshop presented by M. K. Gillis and Bonnie Longnion, 13th Annual Meeting of the Texas State Council of the International Reading Association, Dallas, March.Google Scholar
  39. Gold, P. C. (1984). Cognitive mapping.Acad. Therapy 19: 277–284.Google Scholar
  40. Hagen-Heimlich, J., and Pittleman, S. D. (1984). Classroom applications of the semantic mapping procedure in reading and writing. Program Report 84-4. Madison, Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, The University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  41. Hall, R. H., Dansereau, D. F., and Skaggs, L. P. (1988). Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California, April 1989.Google Scholar
  42. Hanf, M. B. (1971). Mapping: A technique for translating reading into thinking.J. Read. 14: 225–230, 270.Google Scholar
  43. Hawk, P. P., and McLeod, N. P. (1983). Graphic organizer: An effective teaching method.Mid. School J. 14(3): 20–22.Google Scholar
  44. Henry, L. H. (1986). Clustering: Writing (and learning) about economics.Coll. Teach. 34: 89–93.Google Scholar
  45. Herrstrom, D. S. (1984). Technical writing as mapping description onto diagram: The graphic paradigms of explanation.J. Tech. Writing Comm. 14: 223–240.Google Scholar
  46. Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (1984).Spatial Learning Strategies. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., Garland, J. C., McDonald, B. A., and Collins, K. W. (1978). An evaluation of networking as an information processing approach to classroom performance. Presentation, Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, Austin, Texas, January.Google Scholar
  48. Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., McDonald, B. A., Garland, J. C., and Collins, K. W. (1979). Evaluation of a hierarchical mapping technique as an aid to prose processing.Contemp. Educat. Psychol. 4: 227–237.Google Scholar
  49. Idol, L. (1987). A critical thinking map to improve content area comprehension of poor readers. Tech. report 402. Champaign, Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  50. Idol-Maestas, L., and Croll, V. J. (1985). The effects of training in story mapping procedures on the reading comprehension of poor readers. Tech. report 352. Champaign, Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  51. Johnson, D. D., & Pearson, P. D. (1984).Teaching Reading Vocabulary (2nd ed.). New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  52. Johnson, D. D., Pittelman, S. D., Toms-Bronowski, S., and Levin, K. M. (1984). An investigation of the effects of prior knowledge and vocabulary acquisition on passage comprehension (Program report 84-5). Madison, Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, D. D., Toms-Bronowski, S., and Pittelman, S. D. (1982). An investigation of the effectiveness of semantic mapping and semantic feature analysis with intermediate grade level children (Program report 83-3). Madison, Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  54. Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text.Cognit. Instruct. 3: 87–108.Google Scholar
  55. Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.Google Scholar
  56. Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach.Psychol. Rev. 94: 148–175.Google Scholar
  57. Kozma, R. B. (1987). The implications of cognitive psychology for computer-based learning tools.Educat. Technol. (November), 20–25.Google Scholar
  58. Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J. B., and Caterino, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse.Contemp. Educat. Psychol. 10: 28–37.Google Scholar
  59. Larkin, J. H., and Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.Cognit. Sci. 11: 65–99.Google Scholar
  60. Laurich, S. M. (1983). The effects of mind mapping with average and above average readers. Unpublished Master's Seminar Paper, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  61. Lehman, J. D., Carter, C., and Kahle, J. B. (1985). Concept mapping, vee mapping, and achievement: Results of a field study with black high school students.J. Res. Sci. Teach. 22: 663–673.Google Scholar
  62. Leinhardt, G. (1987). Development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessons.Cognit. Instruct. 4: 225–282.Google Scholar
  63. Long, G., and Aldersley, S. (1984). Networking: Application with hearing-impaired students. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies, Orlando, Florida, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  64. Margosein, C. M., Pascarella, E. T., and Pflaum, S. W. (1982). The effects of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York (ED 217 390).Google Scholar
  65. Mirande, M. J. A. (1984). Schematizing: Technique and applications. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Moore, P. J., and Kirby, J. R. (1985). The effects of spatial organizers on text comprehension. Presentation, 30th Annual Meeting of the International Reading Association, New Orleans, May.Google Scholar
  67. Moore, D. W., and Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research.J. Educat. Res. 78: 11–17.Google Scholar
  68. Naveh-Benjamin, M., McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y., and Tucker, D. G. (1986). Inferring students' cognitive structures and their development using the “Ordered Tree Technique.”J. Educat. Psychol. 78: 130–140.Google Scholar
  69. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972).Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  70. Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. (1984).Learning How to Learn. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., and Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students.Sci. Educat. 67: 625–645.Google Scholar
  72. Paivio, A. (1986).Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Pehrsson, R. S., and Denner, P. R. (1988). Semantic organizers: Implications for reading and writing.Top. Lang. Dis. 8: 24–37.Google Scholar
  74. Perrig, W., and Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text.J. Mem. Lang. 24: 503–518.Google Scholar
  75. Pinker, S. (1985). Visual cognition: An introduction. In Pinker, S. (ed.),Visual Cognition, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
  76. Quillian, R. (1968). Semantic memory. In Minsky, M. (ed.),Semantic Information Processing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Reutzel, D. R. (1985). Story maps improve comprehension.The Reading Teacher 38: 400–404.Google Scholar
  78. Reutzel, D. R. (1986). Investigating a synthesized comprehension instructional strategy: The cloze story map.J. Educat. Res. 79: 343–349.Google Scholar
  79. Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., Skaggs, L. P., Hall, R. H., and Pitre, U. (1988). Effects of knowledge maps and scripted cooperation on the recall of technical material. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California, April 1989.Google Scholar
  80. Rich, E. (1983).Artificial Intelligence. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  81. Ruddell, R., and Boyle, O. (1984). A study of the effects of cognitive mapping on reading comprehension and written protocols. Tech. report. No. 7. Riverside, California, Learning from Text Project (ED 252 811).Google Scholar
  82. Rumelhart, D. E., Lindsay, P. H., and Norman, D. A. (1972). A process model for long-term memory. In Tulving, E., and Donaldson, W. (eds.),Organization of Memory, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  83. Salomon, G. (1972). Can we affect cognitive skills through visual media? An hypothesis and initial findings.AV Comm. Rev. 20: 401–422.Google Scholar
  84. Sinatra, R. C., Stahl-Gemake, J., and Berg, D. N. (1984). Improving reading comprehension of disabled readers through semantic mapping.The Reading Teacher 37: 22–29.Google Scholar
  85. Skaggs, L. P., Dansereau, D. F., and Hall, R. H. (1988). The effects of knowledge maps and pictures on the acquisition of scientific information. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California, April 1989.Google Scholar
  86. Spurlin, J. E. (1982). Utility of networking procedure for personal problem solving: Mapping of test anxiety. Dissertation, Texas Christian University.Google Scholar
  87. Stewart, J. H. (1984). The representation of knowledge: Curricular and instructional implications for science teaching. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies: Techniques, Applications, and Related Issues, Orlando, Florida, Academic Press, pp. 235–253.Google Scholar
  88. Stewart, J., Van Kirk, J., and Rowell, R. (1979). Concept maps: A tool for use in biology teaching.Am. Biol. Teach. 41: 171–175.Google Scholar
  89. Surber, J. R. (1984). Mapping as a testing and diagnostic device. In Holley, C. D., and Dansereau, D. F. (eds.),Spatial Learning Strategies, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  90. Vaughan, J. L., Jr. (1982). Use the construct procedure to foster active reading and learning.J. Read. 25: 412–422.Google Scholar
  91. Wicker, A. W. (1985). Getting out of our conceptual ruts: Strategies for expanding conceptual frameworks.Am. Psychol. 40: 1094–1103.Google Scholar
  92. Winograd, T. (1972).Understanding Natural Language. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith G. Lambiotte
    • 1
  • Donald F. Dansereau
    • 2
  • David R. Cross
    • 2
  • Sharon B. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationTexas Christian UniversityFort Worth
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyTexas Christian UniversityFort Worth

Personalised recommendations