Marine Biology

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 281–289 | Cite as

Phosphate uptake by intertidal algae in relation to zonation and season

  • C. L. Hurd
  • M. J. Dring
Article

Abstract

The removal of phosphate from ambient seawater by whole plants of five species of fucoid algae, collected from the east coast of N. Ireland in 1988 and 1989, was followed over 6-h periods. A transient uptake pattern was observed forPelvetia canaliculata (L.) Dcne. et Thuret,Fucus spiralis L.,F. vesiculosus L. andF. serratus L., consisting of an initial period of high uptake, followed by a phase of zero uptake and then a period at an intermediate rate.Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis had a constant slow rate of uptake over 6 h. The initial uptake rate ofF. spiralis was significantly greater than that of any other species. Phosphate uptake over a 2-h period was measured at concentrations ranging from that of ambient seawater to 25µg-at. l−1 for whole plants ofF. spiralis andF. serratus, using a large scale batch method. A small scale batch method was used for whole plants ofP. canaliculata and sections of the other four species investigated. Uptake abilities of the algae at low concentrations of phosphate were compared using the parameterV1 (the uptake rate at 1µg-at. l−1) and at high concentrations usingVmax, the maximum uptake rate. These kinetic parameters of uptake were calculated using a method that avoids bias and permits statistical evaluation of the results. The fucoid algae studied could be divided into two distinct groups on the basis of their abilities to take up phosphate from seawater.P. canaliculata andA. nodosum had low values ofV1 in winter, which were also correlated with their positions on the shore and did not vary between winter and summer. TheFucus species had higher values ofV1 in winter, which were also correlated with their positions on the shore. In summer, however,V1-values for these species decreased and no longer correlated with their shore heights. TheVmax-value forF. spiralis was higher in winter than in summer but was signifcantly greater than that of any other species at all times of year. The ecological significance ofVmax is discussed in relation to nutrient limitation and the possible occurrence of patches of high nutrient concentration in the intertidal environment.

Keywords

Uptake Rate Nutrient Limitation Phosphate Uptake Uptake Pattern High Nutrient Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Baker, S. M. (1909). On the causes of the zoning of brown seaweeds on the seashore. New Phytol. 8: 196–202Google Scholar
  2. Brinkhuis, B. H., Renzhi, L., Chaoyuan, W., Xun-Sen, J. (1989). Nitrite uptake transients and consequences forin vivo algal nitrate reductase assays. J. Phycol. 25: 539–545Google Scholar
  3. Brown, E. J., Button, D. K. (1979). Phosphate-limited growth kinetics ofSelenastrum capricornutum (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 15: 305–311Google Scholar
  4. Cembella, A. D., Antia, N. J., Harrison, P. J. (1983). The utilization of inorganic and organic phosphorus compounds as nutrients by eukaryotic microalgae: a multidisiplinary perspective: Part 1. CRC critical Rev. Microbiol. 10: 317–391Google Scholar
  5. Cornish-Bowden, A. (1976). Principles of enzymes kinetics. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. D'Elia, C. F., DeBoer, J. A. (1978). Nutritional studies of two red algae. II. Kinetics of ammonium and nitrate uptake. J. Phycol. 14: 266–272Google Scholar
  7. Dring, M. J. (1982). The biology of marine plants. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dring, M. J., Brown, F. A. (1982). Photosynthesis of intertidal brown algae during and after periods of emersion: a renewed search for physiological causes of zonation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8: 301–308Google Scholar
  9. Fujita, R. M. (1985). The role of nitrogen status in regulating transient ammonium uptake and nitrogen storage by macroalgae. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 92: 283–301Google Scholar
  10. Fujita, R. M., Wheeler, P. A., Edwards, R. L. (1989). Assessment of macroalgal nitrogen limitation in a seasonal upwelling region. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 53: 293–303Google Scholar
  11. Galvin, R. (1988). The role of hyaline hairs inFucus. Ph. D. thesis, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  12. Harlin, M. M., Wheeler, P. A. (1985). Nutrient uptake. In: Littler, M. M., Littler, D. S. (eds.) Handbook of phycological methods: ecological field methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 493–508Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, P. J., Dreuhl, L. D. (1982). Nutrient uptake and growth in the Laminariales and other macrophytes: a consideration of methods. In: Srivastava, L. M. (ed.) Synthetic and degradative processes in the marine environment. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, p. 99–120Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, P. J., Dreuhl, L. D., Lloyd, K. E., Thompson, P. A. (1986). Nitrogen uptake kinetics in three year classes ofLaminaria groenlandica (Laminariales: Phaeophyta). Mar. Biol. 93: 29–35Google Scholar
  15. Healey, F. P. (1980). Slopes of the Monad equation as an indicator of advantage in nutrient competition. Microb. Ecol 5: 281–286Google Scholar
  16. Hurd, C. L. (1990). The physiological ecology of nutrient uptake by intertidal fucoid algae. Ph. D. thesis, Queen's University, BelfastGoogle Scholar
  17. Knight, M., Parke, M. (1950). A biological study ofFucus vesiculosus (L.) andF. serratus (L.). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 29: 439–514Google Scholar
  18. Lean, D. R. S., Nalewajko, C. (1976). Phosphate exchange and organic phosphorus excretion by freshwater algae. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33: 1312–1323Google Scholar
  19. Lehman, J. T., Scavia, D. (1982). Microscale patchiness of nutrients in plankton communities. Science, N.Y. 216: 729–730Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, J., Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica chim. Acta. 27: 31–36Google Scholar
  21. Neame, K. D., Richards, T. G. (1972). Elementary kinetics of membrane carrier transport. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. O'Brien, M.C., P. A. Wheeler. (1987). Short term uptake of nutrients byEnteromorpha prolifera (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 23: 547–556Google Scholar
  23. Robertson, A. I., Hansen, J. A. (1982). Decomposing seaweed: a nuisance or vital link in coastal food chains? CSIRO Division of Fisheries Research Report 1979–1981, Canberra, p. 75–83Google Scholar
  24. Rugg, D. A., Norton, T. A. (1987).Pelvetia canaliculata, a high shore seaweed that shuns the sea. In: Crawford, R. M. M. (ed.) Plant life in aquatic and amphibious habitats. Blackwell, Oxford, p. 347–358Google Scholar
  25. Ryther, J. H., Corwin, N., DeBusk, T. A., Williams, L. D. (1982). Nitrogen uptake and storage by the red algaGracilaria tikvahiae (McLachlan, 1979). Aquaculture 26: 107–115Google Scholar
  26. Schonbeck, M. W., Norton, T. A. (1978). Factors controlling the upper limits of fucoid algae on the shore. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 31: 303–313Google Scholar
  27. Schonbeck, M. W., Norton, T. A. (1979a). Drought hardening in the upper-shore seaweedsFucus spiralis andPelvetia canaliculata. J. Ecol. 67: 687–696Google Scholar
  28. Schonbeck, M. W., Norton, T. A. (1979b). The effects of brief periodic submergence on intertidal fucoid algae. Estuar. cstl mar. Sci. 8: 205–211Google Scholar
  29. Schonbeck, M. W., Norton, T. A. (1980). Factors controlling the lower limits of fucoid algae on the shore. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 43: 131–150Google Scholar
  30. Suttle, C. A., Harrison, P. J. (1988). Rapid ammonium uptake by freshwater phytoplankton. J. Phycol. 24: 13–16Google Scholar
  31. Thomas, T. E., Harrison, P. J. (1985). Effect of nitrogen supply on nitrogen uptake, accumulation and assimilation inPorphyra perforata (Rhodophyta). Mar. Biol. 85: 269–278Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, T. E., Harrison, P. J. (1987). Rapid ammonium uptake and nitrogen interactions in five intertidal seaweeds grown under field conditions. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 107: 1–8Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, T. E., Turpin, D. H., Harrison, P. J. (1987). Desiccation enhanced nitrogen uptake rates in intertidal seaweeds. Mar. Biol. 94: 293–298Google Scholar
  34. Topinka, J. A. (1978). Nitrogen uptake byF. spiralis (Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 14: 241–247Google Scholar
  35. Turpin, D. H., Harrison, P. J. (1979). Limiting nutrient patchiness and its role in phytoplankton ecology. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 39: 151–166Google Scholar
  36. Wallentinus, I. (1984). Comparisons of nutrient uptake rates for Baltic macroalgae. Mar. Biol. 80: 215–225Google Scholar
  37. Wheeler, P. A. (1983). Phytoplankton nitrogen metabolism. In: Carpenter, E. J., Capone, D. G. (eds.) Nitrogen and the marine environment. Academic Press, New York, p. 309–346Google Scholar
  38. Wilkinson, G. N. (1961). Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem. J. 80: 324–332Google Scholar
  39. Zevenboon, W., Bij de Vaate, A., Mur, L. R. (1982). Assessment of factors limiting growth rate ofOscillatoria agardhii in hypertrophic Lake Wolderwijd, 1978, by use of physiological indicators. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 39–52Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. Hurd
    • 1
  • M. J. Dring
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biology and BiochemistryThe Queen's UniversityBelfastNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations