Sozial- und Präventivmedizin

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 7–12 | Cite as

Cohort analysis: W.H. Frost's contributions to the epidemiology of tuberculosis and chronic disease

  • George W. Comstock
Series: History of Epidemiology

Summary

Although Wade Hampton Frost was not the first to develop cohort analysis, it was the post-humous publication of his study of age and time trends of tuberculosis mortality that directed attention to this method of analysis. Frost's developing interest in and contributions to the epidemiology of chronic disease are reviewed in connection with a summary of his professional career.

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl Wade Hampton Frost nicht der erste war, der die Kohortenanalyse entwickelte, war es die posthume Veröffentlichung seiner Studie zu Alter und Zeittrends von Tuberkulose-Mortalität, die die Aufmerksamkeit für diese Analysemethode auf sich zog. Frosts fortschreitendes Interesse an und seine Beiträge zur Epidemiologie von chronischen Krankheiten werden in diesem Artikel zusammen mit einem Überblick über seine berufliche Karriere nachgezeichnet.

Résumé

Bien que Wade Hampton Frost ne fut pas l'inventeur de l'analyse de cohorte, c'est la publication posthume de son étude sur les tendances temporelle et selon l'âge des décès par tuberculose qui a attiré l'attention sur ce type d'analyse. Cet article montre le lien entre la carrière professionnelle de Frost, son intérêt croissant et sa contribution a l'épidémiologie des maladies chroniques.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Maxcy KF, ed. Papers of Wade Hampton Frost, M.D. A contribution to epidemiological method. New York: The Commonwealth fund, 1941. (This is the major source of material for this article).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kasius RV, ed. The challenge of facts. Selected public health papers of Edgar Sydenstricker. New York: Prodist, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frost WH. The importance of epidemiology as a function of health departments. Medical Officer (London), 1923;23: 113–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frost WH. Epidemiology. Nelson Loose-Leaf System, Public Health-Preventive Medicine. Volume 2, Chapter 7. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1927. [Reprinted in (1).]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fee E. Disease and discovery. A history of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, 1916–1939, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linder FE, Grove RD. Vital statistics rates in the United States, 1900–1940. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1947.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Public Health Service, Division of Public Health Methods and Tuberculosis Control Division. Tuberculosis in the United States, graphic presentation. Vol 2: Proportionate mortality statistics for states and geographic divisions by age, sex and race. Washington: Medical Research Committee, National Tuberculosis Association, 1944.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Puffer RR. Familial susceptibility to tuberculosis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zeidberg LD, Gass RG, Dillon A, Hutcheson RH. The Williamson County Study. A twenty-four-year epidemiologic study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1963;87(No. 3 Part 2): 1–88.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frost WH. Risk of persons in familial contact with pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Public Health 1933;23:426–32.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elderton WP, Perry SJ. Drapers' Company Research Memoirs. Studies in National Deterioration. VI: A third study of the statistics of pulmonary tuberculosis. The mortality of the tuberculous and sanatorium treatment. London: Cambridge University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weinberg W. Die Kinder der Tuberkulosen. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1913.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown L, Pope EG. The postdischarge mortality among the patients of the Adirondack Cottage Sanitarium. Am Med 1904;8: 879–82.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Putnam P. Tuberculosis incidence among white persons and negroes following exposure to the disease. Am J Hyg 1936;24: 536–51.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Downes J. A study of the risk of attack among contacts in tuberculous families in a rural area. Am J Hyg 1935;22: 731–42.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cassedy JH. Charles V. Chapin and the Public Health Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frost WH. The age selection of mortality from tuberculosis in successive decades. Am J Hyg 1939;30: 91–6. (Reprinted in Am J Epidemiol 1995;141: 4–9).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frost WH. How much control of tuberculosis? Am J Public Health 1937;27: 759–66.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andvord KF. Hvad kan vi laere ved a folge tuberkulosens gang fra generasjon til generasjon? Norsk Magasin Laegevidenskapen 1930;91: 642–60. (Engl. transl. by Gerard Wijsmuller).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Comstock GW. Early studies of tuberculosis. National Cancer Institute Monograph 67. Selection, follow-up, and analysis in prospective studies: a workshop. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985. (NIH Publication No. 85-2713).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frost WH. The outlook for the eradication of tuberculosis. Am Rev Tuberc 1935;32: 644–50.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Tuberculosis Association, Committee on Diagnostic Standards. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. 1940 edition, New York: National Tuberculosis Association, 1940.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    American Thoracic Society, Committee on Revision of Diagnostic Standards. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis, New York: National Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease Association, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • George W. Comstock
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Hygiene and Public HealthJohns Hopkins University Washington County Health DepartmentHagerstownUSA

Personalised recommendations