Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 365–372 | Cite as

Relation of virus particle counts to the hemagglutinating activity of influenza virus suspensions measured by the HA pattern test and by use of the photometric HCU method

  • U. Desselberger
Article

Summary

The ratios of the number of virus particles (n.v.p.) to the hemagglutinating activity were determined for a series of influenza A and B strains using both the photometric HCU method and the HA pattern test. The logarithms of the ratios of n.v.p./HCU ranged from 7.06 to 7.54 and the logarithms of the ratios of n.v.p./HA from 6.87 to 7.56.

While the n.v.p./HA ratios of different strains showed significant differences in a number of cases, such differences were not found for the n.v.p./HCU ratios with the only exception of the strain B/Hong Kong/8/73 differing uniformly from the other strains tested.

Since the standard deviation of HCU values ranged from 0.006 to 0.039 log units and that of HA titers from 0.076 to 0.272 log units, it was concluded that the differences of n.v.p./HA ratios found were due to the range of variance of HA tests and did not reflect strain specific differences.

The degree of purity of virus suspensions was found not to influence measurably the log n.v.p./HCU values.

Keywords

Standard Deviation Infectious Disease Influenza Influenza Virus Virus Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bateman, J. B., Davis, M. S., McCaffrey, P. A.: A note on the reaction of heated influenza virus protein with red blood cells. Amer. J. Hyg.62, 349–354 (1955).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., Brandon, F. M., Webster, R. G., Barrett, C. D., Jr., Lease, G. O.: Comparisons of serologic and febrile responses in humans to vaccination with influenza A viruses or their hemagglutinins. J. Lab. clin. Med.63, 5–13 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., Drescher, J., Webster, R. G.: Analytical, serological and clinical experiences with the hemagglutinating subunits of influenza A virus. Ciba Foundation Symposium on Cellular Biology of Myxovirus Infections. London 1964, p. 272–287.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dawson, I. M., Elford, W. J.: Electron microscope studies on the interaction of certain viruses with fowl red cell membranes. Nature163, 63–64 (1949).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donald, H. B., Isaacs, A.: Counts of influenza virus particles. J. gen. Microbiol.10, 457–464 (1954a).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donald, H. B., Isaacs, A.: Some properties of influenza virus filaments shown by electron microscopic particle counts. J. gen. Microbiol.11, 325–331 (1954b).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drescher, J.: Use of ether treated influenza virus for antibody titration by means of the photometric ACU method. Amer. J. Epidemiol.84, 167–179 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drescher, J.: Patterns of cross reaction of selected influenza virus A2 strains isolated from 1957 to 1968, as determined by use of a photometric hemagglutination-inhibition test. Amer. J. Epidemiol.95, 549–556 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drescher, J., Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V.: Photometric methods for the measurement of hemagglutinating viruses and antibody. II. Further experience with antibody determinations and the description of a technique for analysis of virus mixtures. J. Immunol.89, 805–814 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drescher, J., Desselberger, U., Lubach, D.: Kinetics of inhibition of influenza virus hemagglutination by homologous antihemagglutinin and antineuraminidase antibodies as measured by means of the photometric antibody concentration unit method. J. Virol.14, 1361–1368 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drescher, J., Hennessy, A. V., Davenport, F. M.: Photometric methods for the measurement of hemagglutinating viruses and antibody. I. Further experience with a novel photometric method for measuring hemagglutinins. J. Immunol.89, 794–804 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drescher, J., Masurel, N.: Photometric method for determination of doubly specific influenza antibody. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. I. Abt. Orig. A225, 233–244 (1973).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friedewaldt, W. F., Pickels, E. G.: Centrifugation and ultrafiltration studies on allantoic fluid preparations of influenza virus. J. exp. Med.79, 301–317 (1944).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isaacs, A.: Particle counts and infectivity titrations for animal viruses. Adv. Virus Res.4, 111–158 (1957).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Isaacs, A., Donald, H. B.: Particle counts of hemagglutinating viruses. J. gen. Microbiol.12, 241–247 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kleczkowski, A.: Experimental design and statistical methods of assay. In:Maramorosch, K., Koprowski, H. (eds.), Methods in Virology, Vol. IV, 729. New York-London: Academic Press 1968.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lorenz, R.: Beschreibung einer modifizierten Technik zur Bestimmung von Qualität und Konzentration von Influenzavirus-Antikörper-Molekülen mittels der Gleichgewichtsfiltration und Vergleich ihrer Aussagefähigkeit mit der der konventionellen Methode. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. I. Abt. Orig. A225, 7–18 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lubach, D.: Beschreibung einer Methode zur Bestimmung der Anzahl und Qualität von Influenzavirus-Antikörper-Molekülen mittels der Gleichgewichtszentrifugation. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. I. Abt. Orig. A230, 141–158 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reed, L. J., Muench, H.: A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Amer. J. Hyg.27, 493–497 (1938).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tischer, I.: Versuche zur Hämagglutination durch Influenza-Virus. I. Mitt.: Die Veränderung der Hämagglutinationsfähigkeit von Influenza-Virus durch UV-Bestrahlung. Z. Naturforsch.14b, 515–522 (1959).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tyrrell, D. A. J., Valentine, R. C.: The assay of influenza virus particles by haemagglutination and electron microscopy. J. gen. Microbiol.16, 668–675 (1957).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Werner, G. H., Schlesinger, R. W.: Morphological and quantitative comparison between infectious and non-infectious forms of influenza virus. J. exp. Med.100, 203–215 (1954).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Desselberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of VirologyMedizinische Hochschule HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations