Archives of Virology

, Volume 51, Issue 1–2, pp 51–58

Quantitative studies on adsorption, elution, and haemagglutination of vesicular stomatitis virus

  • P. Arstila
Original Papers

Summary

Radioactively-labelled VSV, both Indiana and New Jersey serotypes, were rapidly and efficiently adsorbed onto goose erythrocytes, but only within a narrow range of pH and at low temperatures. Under optimal conditions for adsorption, both infectivity and haemagglutinating activity of VSV were reduced. A basic difference between the two serotypes was identified: adsorption and haemagglutination of the Indiana serotype were stable even at pH 9.0 and at 37° C, whereas New Jersey serotype was eluted slowly at +0° C and at pH 6.4 and rapidly at a higher temperature and pH. The rapid elution offers a useful method for purification of New Jersey serotype.

Particle counting of VSV showed that 10 to 50 virus particles were required for one PFU. Haemagglutination was not a sensitive method for assaying small amounts of VSV; 3–20 × 107 virus particles or more than 107 PFU corresponded to one HAU.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arstila, P., Halonen, P., Salmi, A.: Hemagglutinin of vesicular stomatitis virus. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.27, 198–208 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arstila, P.: Two hemagglutinating components of vesicular stomatitis virus. Acta path. microbiol. scand.80 B, 33–40 (1972).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arstila, P.: Small-sized haemagglutinin of vesicular stomatitis virus released spontaneously and with Nonidet P40. Acta path. microbiol. scand.81 B, 27–36 (1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bray, G. A.: A simple efficient liquid scintillator for counting aqueous solutions in a liquid scintillation counter. Analyt. Biochem.1, 279–285 (1960).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galasso, G. J.: Quantitative studies on the quality, effects of aggregation and thermal inactivation of vesicular stomatitis virus. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.21, 437 to 446 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halonen, P. E., Murphy, F. A., Fields, B. N., Reese, D. R.: Hemagglutinin of rabies and some other bullet-shaped viruses. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol.127, 1037–1042 (1968).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuwert, E., Wiktor, T. J., Sokol, F., Koprowski, H.: Hemagglutination by rabies virus. J. Virol.2, 1381–1392 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Monroe, J. H., Brandt, P. M.: Rapid semiquantitative method for screening large numbers of virus samples by negative staining electron microscopy. Appl. Microbiol.20, 259–262 (1970).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valle, M.: Factors affecting plaque assay of animal viruses with special reference to vesicular stomatitis and vaccinia virus. Acta path. microbiol. scand. B, Suppl.219 (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Arstila
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of VirologyUniversity of TurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations