Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 121, Issue 1–4, pp 19–27 | Cite as

Effect of polyions on the early events of Sindbis virus infection of Vero cells

  • P. Mastromarino
  • C. Conti
  • R. Petruzziello
  • R. Lapadula
  • N. Orsi
Original Papers

Summary

To clarify the role of electrostatic interactions in the binding of Sindbis virus (SNV) to cell membrane receptors, we investigated the effect of different polyions on the initial steps of infection of Vero cells by the virus. Several polyanions (mucin, heparin, polygalacturonic acid) and polycations (polylysine, protamine, polybrene) were able to reduce the replication of SNV when present in the viral adsorption period, whereas others (chondroitin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, histone) were devoid of any activity. Therefore the electric charge alone is not sufficient to explain the action of compounds. The effects of polyions on receptor binding, on bound virus, and on internalized virus have been examined. All the drugs inhibited SNV infection by affecting its binding to the cellular receptor. The results indicated that heparin and mucin act directly on the virus particle while polycations bind to the cell membrane receptor for the virus, protamine being effective on both targets. Since among polyanions glycosaminoglycans showed a strong inhibiting activity, the involvement of these molecules in the virus surface receptor was assessed by enzyme digestion of cell membrane with heparinase and chondroitin ABC lyase.

Keywords

Heparin Virus Particle Chondroitin Sulfate Glycosaminoglycan Vero Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker FF (1961) Studies on the hemolytic properties of protamine. J Gen Physiol 44: 433–442Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connolly JH (1966) Effect of histones and protamine on the infectivity of Semliki Forest virus and its ribonucleic acid. Nature 212: 858Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duda E, Berencsi K (1980) Sindbis virus receptor protein on BHK cells. Acta Virol 24: 149–152Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Langeland N, Moore LJ, Holmsen H, Haarr L (1988) Interaction of polylysine with the cellular receptor for herpes simplex virus type 1. J Gen Virol 69: 1137–1145Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leiderman LJ, Criss WE, Oka T (1985) The characterization and regulation of a polyamine-responsive, cyclic nucleotide-independent protein kinase activity in the mouse mammary gland. Biochim Biophys Acta 844: 95–104Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Petit J, Nobili O, Boyer J (1986) Stimulation of brain lipase activity by polyamines. Comparison with the effect of ACTH. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24: 1543–1545Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lonberg-Holm K, Philipson L (1974) Attachment of virions to host cells. In: Melnick JL (ed) Early interaction between animal viruses and cells. Karger, Basel, pp 24–49 (Monographs in virology, vol 9)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lonberg-Holm K (1980) Attachment of animal virus to cells, an introduction. In: Lonberg-Holm K, Philipson L (eds) Receptors and recognition, series B, vol 8, virus receptors, part 2. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maassen JA, Terhorst C (1981) Identification of a cell-surface protein involved in the binding site of Sindbis virus on human lymphoblastoic cell lines using a heterobifunctional cross-linker. Eur J Biochem 115: 153–158Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mastromarino P, Conti C, Rieti S, Orsi N (1988) Identification of lipid components of human serum lipoproteins involved in the inhibition of Sindbis virus infectivity, hemagglutination and hemolysis. Arch Virol 103: 243–252Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mastromarino P, Conti C, Rieti S, Orsi N (1989) Involvement of lipids in the interaction of Sindbis virus with goose erythrocytes. Microbiologica 12: 113–120Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pierce JS, Strauss EG, Strauss JH (1975) Effects of ionic strength on the binding of Sindbis virus to chick cells. J Virol 13: 1030–1036Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanders BG, Wan KM, Kline K, Garry RF, Bose HR Jr (1980) Chicken fetal antigens: role as cell surface receptors for Sindbis virus hemagglutinin. Virology 106: 183–186Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shen WC, Ryser HJ-P, Lamanna L (1985) Disulfide spacer between methotrexate and poly(D-lysine). J Biol Chem 260: 10905–10908Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Symington J, Schlesinger MJ (1975) Isolation of Sindbis virus variant by passage on mouse plasmacytoma cells. J Virol 15: 1037–1041Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Symington J, Schlesinger MJ (1978) Characterization of a Sindbis virus variant with altered host range. Arch Virol 58: 127–136Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tilles JG (1967) Enhancement of interferon titers by poly-L-ornithine. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 125: 996–999Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walter A, Steer CJ, Blumenthal R (1986) Polylysine induces pH-dependent fusion of acidic phospholipid vesicles: a model for the polycation-induced fusion. Biochim Biophys Acta 861: 319–330Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Mastromarino
    • 1
  • C. Conti
    • 1
  • R. Petruzziello
    • 1
  • R. Lapadula
    • 1
  • N. Orsi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Microbiology, School of MedicineUniversity of Rome “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations