Archives of Virology

, Volume 104, Issue 1–2, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Applying the species concept to plant viruses

  • M. H. V. Van Regenmortel
Brief Review


Plant virologists who maintain that the concept of species cannot be applied to viruses argue their case in terms of an obsolete concept of biological species defined by gene pools and reproductive isolation and applicable only to sexually reproducing organisms. In fact, various species concepts have been used by biologists and some of them are applicable to asexual organisms. The rationale for applying the species concept in virology is that viruses are biological entities and not chemicals: they possess genes, replicate, specialize, evolve and occupy specific ecological niches. The following definition is proposed: a virus species is a polythetic class of viruses constituting a replicating lineage and occupying a particular ecological niche. Such a definition of the species category does not and cannot provide a list of diagnostic properties for recognizing members of a particular virus species. It should also be stressed that a single property such as an arbitrary level of genome homology or the extent of serological relationship always fails to establish membership in a polythetic class. A binomial system of nomenclature is advocated in which the vernacular English name of the plant virus is adopted as the species name and the group name is assimilated to the level of genus. Adoption of this system would ensure that a universal classification system based on the classical categories of species, genus, and family becomes possible for all viruses.


Ecological Niche Reproductive Isolation Plant Virus Species Concept Specific Ecological Niche 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ball IR (1983) On groups, existence and the ordering of nature. Syst Zool 32: 446–451Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beatty J (1982) Classes and cladists. Syst Zool 31: 25–34Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beckner M (1959) The biological way of thought. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernier R (1984) The species as an individual: facing essentialism. Syst Zool 33: 460–469Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bishop DHL (1985) The genetic basis for describing viruses as species. Intervirology 24: 79–93Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bock WJ (1974) Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification. Syst Zool 22: 375–392Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bodmer WF (1970) The evolutionary significance of recombination in prokariotes. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol 20: 279–294Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bridgman PW (1927) The logic of modern physics. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cowan ST (1962) The microbiol species—a macromyth? Symp Soc Gen Microbiol 12: 433–455Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ehrlich PR (1964) Some axioms of taxonomy. Syst Zool 13: 109–123Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehrlich PR, Holm RW (1962) Patterns and populations. Science 137: 652–657Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1969) Differentiation of populations. Science 165: 1228–1231Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fenner F (1976) Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Second report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Intervirology 7: 1–115Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Francki RIB (1981) Plant virus taxonomy. In: Kurstak E (ed) Handbook of plant virus infections and comparative diagnosis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Francki RIB (1983) Current problems in plant virus taxonomy. In: Matthews REF (ed) A critical appraisal of viral taxonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 63–104Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gentry GA, Rana S, Hutchinson M, Starr P (1988) Evolution of herpes and pox viruses and their hosts: a problem with the molecular clock. Intervirology 29: 277–280Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Syst Zool 23: 536–544Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghiselin MT (1980) Biogeographical units: more on radical solutions. Syst Zool 29: 80–85Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghiselin MT (1984) “Definition”, “character”, and other equivocal terms. Syst Zool 33: 104–110Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghiselin MT (1985) Can Aristotle be reconciled with Darwin? Syst Zool 34: 457–460Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gibbs AJ (1969) Plant virus classification. Adv Virus Res 14: 163–328Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gibbs AJ (1980) How ancient are the tobamoviruses? Intervirology 14: 101–108Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldbach R, Wellink J (1988) Evolution of plus-strand RNA viruses. Intervirology 29: 260–267Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gorman BM (1984) Application of evolutionary species concepts to viruses. Abstr Sixth Int Congr Virology, Sendai, p 388Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grant V (1981) Plant speciation, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harrison BD (1985) Usefulness and limitations of the species concept for plant viruses. Intervirology 24: 71–78Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hempel CG (1960) Operationism, observation, and theoretical terms. In: Danto A, Morgenbesser S (eds) Philosophy of science. Meridian Books, New York, pp 101–120Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hengeveld R (1988) Mayr's ecological species criterion. Syst Zool 37: 47–55Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hollings M, Brunt AA (1981) Potyviruses. In: Kurstak E (ed) Handbook of plant virus infections and comparative diagnosis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 731–807Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Holman EW (1987) Recognizability of sexual and asexual species of rotifers. Syst Zool 36: 381–386Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hull DL (1965) The effect of essentialism on taxonomy—two thousand years of stasis. The Br J Philos Sci 16: 1–18Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hull DL (1968) The operational imperative: sense and nonsense in operationism. Syst Zool 17: 438–457Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hull DL (1976) Are species really individuals? Syst Zool 25: 174–191Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kingsbury DW (1985) Species classification problems in virus taxonomy. Intervirology 24: 62–70Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kingsbury DW (1988) Biological concepts in virus classification. Intervirology 29: 242–253Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kitts DB (1983) Can baptism alone save a species? Syst Zool 32: 27–33Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kitts DB (1984) The names of species: a reply to Hull. Syst Zool 33: 112–115Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lambert DM, Michaux B, White CS (1987) Are species self-defining? Syst Zool 36: 196–205Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Levin DA (1979) The nature of plant species. Science 204: 381–384Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lovtrup S (1979) The evolutionary species: fact or fiction? Syst Zool 28: 386–392Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luytjes W, Bredenbeek PJ, Noten AFH, Horzinek MC, Spaan WJM (1988) Sequence of mouse hepatitis virus A59 mRNA 2: indications for RNA recombination between coronaviruses and influenza C virus. Virology 166: 415–422Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Matthews REF (1982) Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Fourth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses 17: 1–200Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Matthews REF (1983a) The history of viral taxonomy. In: Matthews REF (ed) A critical appraisal of viral taxonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Matthews REF (1983b) Future prospects for viral taxonomy. In: Matthews REF (ed) A critical appraisal of viral taxonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 219–245Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Matthews REF (1985a) Viral taxonomy for the nonvirologist. Ann Rev Microbiol 39: 451–474Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Matthews REF (1985b) Viral taxonomy. Microbiol Sci 2: 74–75Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mayr E (1970) Populations, species, and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mayr E (1981) Biological classification: toward a synthesis of opposing methodologies. Science 214: 510–516Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Milne RG (1984) The species problem in plant virology. Microbiol Sci 1: 113–122Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Milne RG (1985) Alternatives to the species concept for virus taxonomy. Intervirology 24: 94–98Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Milne RG (1988) Species concept should not be universally applied to virus taxonomy—but what to do instead? Intervirology 29: 254–259Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mishler BD, Donoghue MJ (1982) Species concepts: a case for pluralism. Syst Zool 31: 491–503Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Murant AF (1985) Taxonomy and nomenclature of viruses. Microbiol Sci 2: 218–220Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rowe T (1987) Definition and diagnosis in the phylogenetic system. Syst Zool 36: 208–211Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sattler R (1986) Bio-philosophy. Analytic and holistic perspectives. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shukla DD, Gough KH, Ward CW (1987) Coat protein of potyviruses. 3. Comparison of amino acid sequences of the coat proteins of four Australian strains of sugarcane mosaic virus. Arch Virol 96: 59–74Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shukla DD, Inglis AS, McKern NM, Gough KH (1986) Coat protein of potyviruses. 2. Amino acid sequence of the coat protein of potato virus Y. Virology 152: 118–125Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shukla DD, Ward CW (1988) Amino acid sequence homology of coat proteins as a basis for identification and classification of the potyvirus group. J Gen Virol 69: 2703–2710Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Simpson GG (1961) Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sokal RR (1974) The species problem reconsidered. Syst Zool 22: 360–374Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Van Regenmortel (1982) Serology and immunochemistry of plant viruses. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Van Regenmortel MHV, Fraenkel-Conrat H (1986) The plant viruses, vol 2: the rod-shaped plant viruses. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Van Valen L (1976) Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233–239Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Van Vloten-Doting L, Francki RIB, Fulton RW, Kaper JM, Lane LC (1981) Tricornaviridae—a proposed family of plant viruses with tripartite, single-stranded RNA genomes. Intervirology 15: 198–203Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wiley EO (1978) The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst Zool 27: 17–26Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wiley EO (1980) Is the evolutionary species fiction? A consideration of classes, individuals and historical entities. Syst Zool 29: 76–80Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. V. Van Regenmortel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire du CNRSStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations