Marine Biology

, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 79–86 | Cite as

Mass mortality ofDiadema antillarum

II. Effects on population densities and grazing intensity of parrotfishes and surgeonfishes
  • R. C. Carpenter
Article
Accepted:

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that herbivorous fishes and the regular echinoidDiadema antillarum Philippi compete for benthic algae as their major food resource. Mass mortality ofD. antillarum in February 1984 provided the opportunity to test the hypothesis that herbivorous fishes and sea urchins were competing previously. Visual censuses of herbivorous fishes conducted over 4 yr in four reef zones on Tague Bay Reef, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, before and after the mass mortality indicated that population densities increased approximately three-fold in backreef and shallow (2m) forereef zones and two-fold, and four-fold in mid (5m) and deep (10m) forereef zones, respectively. Juvenile parrotfishes constituted the major component of these increases, except in the shallow forereef where acanthurids became most abundant. Grazing intensity by herbivorous fishes increased in three of the four reef zones immediately following the mass mortality. These data support the hypothesis that exploitative competition for algal resources was occurring prior to the sea urchin mass-mortality, although alternative hypotheses cannot be discounted completely. Despite the increases in the abundances of, and grazing by, herbivorous fishes, the algal community continued to increase in percent cover and biomass, indicating that increased grazing by fishes does not compensate for the loss of grazing byD. antillarum in controlling algal abundance and community structure.

Keywords

Percent Cover Backreef Major Food Grazing Intensity Forereef 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Carpenter, R. C. (1984). Predator and population density control of homing behavior in the Caribbean echinoidDiadema antillarum. Mar. Biol. 82: 101–108Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter, R. C. (1986). Partitioning herbivory and its effects on coral reef algal communities. Ecol. Monogr. 56: 345–363Google Scholar
  3. Carpenter, R. C. (1988). Mass mortality of a Caribbean echinoid: immediate effects on community metabolism and other herbivores. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85: 511–514Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, R. C. (1990) Mass mortality ofDiadema antillarum. I. Long-term effects on sea urchin population-dynamics and coral reef algal communities. 104: 67–77Google Scholar
  5. Choat, J. H. (1983). Estimation of the abundances of herbivorous fishes and their grazing rates within reef systems. In: Baker, J. T., Carter, R. M., Sammarco, P. W., Stark, K. P. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Great Barrier Reef Conference. James Cook University Press, Townsville, Australia, p. 272–276Google Scholar
  6. Clavijo, I. E., Brandon, M., Tobias, W. (1985). Virgin Islands State/Federal Cooperative Statistics Program Annual Report, submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Region, St. Petersburg, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Clavijo, I. E., Tobias, W., Jennings, C. (1986). Virgin Islands State/Federal Cooperative Statistics Program Annual Report, submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Region, St. Petersburg, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell, J. H. (1983). On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122: 661–696Google Scholar
  9. Foster, S. A. (1987). The relative impacts of grazing by Caribbean coral reef fishes andDiadema: effects of habitat and surge. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 105: 1–20Google Scholar
  10. Hackney, J. M., Carpenter, R. C., Adey, W. H. (1989). Characteristic adaptations to grazing among algal turfs on a Caribbean coral reef. Phycologia 28: 109–119Google Scholar
  11. Hatcher, B. G. (1981). The interaction between grazing organisms and the epilithic algal community of a coral reef: a quantitative assessment. Proc. 4th int. coral Reef Symp. 2: 515–524 [Gomez, E. D., et al. (eds.) Marine Sciences Center, University of the Philippines, Quezon City]Google Scholar
  12. Hay, M. E. (1981). Spatial patterns of grazing intensity on a Caribbean barrier reef: herbivory and algal distribution. Aquat. Bot. 11: 97–109Google Scholar
  13. Hay, M. E. (1984). Patterns of fish and urchin grazing on Caribbean coral reefs: are previous results typical? Ecology 65: 446–454Google Scholar
  14. Hay, M. E., Taylor, P. R. (1985). Competition between herbivorous fishes and urchins on Caribbean reefs. Oecologia 65: 591–598Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, T. P. (1989). Community structure and diversity of coral reefs: the role of history. Ecology 70: 275–279Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, T. P., Reed, D. C., Boyle, M. J. (1987). Herbivory on coral reefs: community structure following mass mortalities of sea urchins. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 113: 39–59Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, S. M. (1986). The role of herbivorous fishes in the organization of a Caribbean reef community. Ecol. Monogr. 56: 183–200Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, S. M., Wainwright, P. C. (1985). Herbivore abundances and grazing intensity on a Caribbean coral reef. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 87: 215–228Google Scholar
  19. Liddell, W. D., Ohlhorst, S. L. (1986). Changes in benthic community composition following the mass mortality ofDiadema at Jamaica. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 95: 271–278Google Scholar
  20. Morrison, D. (1988). Comparing fish and urchin grazing in shallow and deeper coral reef algal communities. Ecology 69: 1367–1382Google Scholar
  21. Ogden, J. C. (1976). Some aspects of herbivore-plant relationships on Caribbean reefs and seagrass beds. Aquat. Bot. 2: 103–106Google Scholar
  22. Ogden, J. C., Buckman, N. S. (1973). Movements, foraging groups, and diurnal migrations of the striped parrotfishScarus croicensis Bloch (Scaridae). Ecology 54: 589–596Google Scholar
  23. Ogden, J. C., Lobel, P. S. (1978). The role of herbivorous fishes and urchins in coral reef communities. Envir. Biol. Fish. 3: 49–63Google Scholar
  24. Ruyter van Steveninck, E. D. de, Bak, R. P. M. (1986). Changes in abundance of coral-reef bottom components related to mass mortality of the sea urchinDiadema antillarum. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 34: 87–94Google Scholar
  25. Sammarco, P. W. (1980).Diadema and its relationship to coral spat mortality: grazing, competition and biological disturbance. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 45: 245–272Google Scholar
  26. Steneck, R. S. (1983). Quantifying herbivory on coral reefs: just scratching the surface and still biting off more than we can chew. In: Reaka, M. L. (ed.) The ecology of deep and shallow coral reefs. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Maryland, p. 103–111Google Scholar
  27. Steneck, R. S. (in press). Herbivory on coral reefs: a synthesis. Proc. 6th int. Symp. coral Reefs [Choat, J. H., et al. (eds.) James Cook University, Townsville]Google Scholar
  28. Tsuda, R. T., Bryan, H. T. (1973). Food preference of juvenileSiganus rostratus andS. spinus in Guam. Copeia 1973: 604–606Google Scholar
  29. Williams, A. H. (1981). An analysis of competitive interactions in a patchy back-reef environment. Ecology 62: 1107–1120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. C. Carpenter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCalifornia State UniversityNorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations