Horizontal, vertical and seasonal distributions of epiphytic hydrozoa on the algaHalimeda tuna in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea
- 76 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Abstract
The thalli ofHalimeda tuna (Ellis & Solander) grow horizontally from rocky surfaces and present an upper and lower surface which can be colonized by epiphytes. Thalli ofH. tuna were collected twice a month from March 1985 to March 1986 at Tossa de Mar (northeast Spain). Thirty five species of hydroid were recorded living onH. tuna thalli; of these, the 15 most abundant species were classified into three groups on the basis of their horizontal zonation on the thalli: those most abundant on the proximal, medial or distal articles. Those hydroids common on the proximal (oldest) articles were relatively large and were present throughout the year, those common on the medial articles were smaller and often occurred in dense monospecific patches, while those common on the distal (youngest) articles were present for only short periods and were the most opportunistic hydroids found onH. tuna. We hypothesize that this zonation reflects interspecific niche-selection, enabling successful competition for space with other hydroids, algae and bryozonas. Three hydroid species were more abundant on the upper surfaces of the algae than on the lower, probably because of gravitationally enhanced settlement of planula larvae coupled with (unusually) limited hydrorhizal growth on the underside. Three opportunistic species were more common on the lower surfaces of the thalli, possibly reflecting the greater availability of substratum in the shade, where epiphytic algae were less abundant. Many hydroids declined in abundance in summer because of the death of old thalli, the growth of new thalli and of apical articles on existing thalli, and possibly because of interspecific competition with epiphytic algae. The death of old thalli and the growth of new thalli reduced the abundance of epiphytic algae; this may have facilitated the increase in abundance of hydroids recorded in the autumn.
Keywords
Lower Surface Abundant Species Interspecific Competition Seasonal Distribution Great AvailabilityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- Ballesteros, E. (1984). Els vegetals i la zonacio littoral: especies, comunitats i factors que influeixen en seva distribucio. PhD thesis, University of BarcolonaGoogle Scholar
- Barange, M., Gili, J. M. (1988). Feeding cycles and prey capture in the hydroidEudendrium racemosum. J. exp. mar. Biol. Exol. 115: 281–293Google Scholar
- Boero, F. (1984). The ecology of marine hydroids and effects of environmental factors: a review. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli (I: Mar. Ecol.) 5: 93–118Google Scholar
- Boero, F., Fresi, E. (1986). Zonation and evolution of a rocky bottom hydroid community. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli (I: Mar. Ecol.) 7: 123–150Google Scholar
- Garcia-Rubies, A. (1987). Distribution of epiphytic hydroids onPosidonia sea grass. In: Bouillon, J., Boero, F., Cicogna, F., Cornelius, P. F. S. (eds.) Modern trends in the systematics, ecology, and evolution of hydroids and hydromedusae. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, p. 143–155Google Scholar
- Gili, J. M. (1986). Estudio sistematico y faunistico de los cnidarios de la costa Catalana. PhD thesis. University Autonoma de BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
- Gili, J. M., Murillo, J. Ros, J. D. (1989). The distribution pattern of benthic cnidarians in the Western Mediterranean. Scientia mar. 53: 19–35Google Scholar
- Hayward, P. J. (1980). Invertebrate epiphytes of coastal marine algae. In: Price, J. H., Irvine, D. E. R., Farnham, W. F. (eds.) The shore environment. Vol. 2. Ecosystems. Academic Press, London, p. 761–787Google Scholar
- Hughes, R. G. (1975). The distribution of epizoites on the hydroidNemertesia antennina (L.). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 55: 275–294Google Scholar
- Hughes, R. G. (1987). The loss of hydranths ofLaomedea flexuosa Alder and other hydroids, with reference to hydroid senescence. In: Bouillon, J., Boero, F., Cicogna, F., Cornelius, P. F. S: (eds.) Modern trends in the sytematics, ecology, and evolution of hydroids and hydromedusae. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, p. 171–184Google Scholar
- Hughes, R. G., Johnson, S., Smith, I. D. (1991). The growth strategies of some hydroids that are obligate epiphytes of seagrass leaves. Hydrobiologia (in press)Google Scholar
- Huve, P. (1954).Hydranthea etCampalecium genres Mediterranéens aberrants d'hydroides de la famille des haleciides. Recl Trav. Sth mar. Endoume 13: 173–192Google Scholar
- Kato, M., Hirai, E., Kakinuma, Y. (1967). Experiments on the coaction among hydrozoan species in the colony formation. Sci. Rep. Tôhoku Univ. (Ser. 4: Biology) 29: 317–325Google Scholar
- Meinesz, A. (1980) Contribution à l'étude des Caulperpales (chlorophytes). Ph.D. thesis. Université NiceGoogle Scholar
- Riedl, R. (1959). Die Hydroiden des Golfes von Neapel und ihr Anteil an der Fauna unterirdischer Höhlen. Ergebnisse der Österreichischen Tyrrenia-Expedition 1952. Teil XVI. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli 30 (Suppl.): 591–755Google Scholar
- Riedl, R. (1966). Biologie der Meereshöhlen. Paul Parey, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Seed, R. (1985). Ecological patterns in the epifaunal communities of coastal macroalgae. In: Moore, P. G., Seed, R. (eds.) The ecology of rocky coasts. Hodder & Stoughton, London, p. 22–35Google Scholar
- Sieburth, J. M., Conover, J. T. (1964).Sargassum tannin, an antibiotic which retards fouling. Nature, Lond. 208: 52–53Google Scholar
- Standing, J. (1976). Fouling community structure: effects of the hydroid,Obelia dichotoma, on larval recruitment. In: Mackie, G. O. (ed.) Coelenterate ecology and behavior. Plenum Press, New York, p. 155–164Google Scholar
- Stebbing, A. R. D. (1973). Competition for space between epiphytes ofFucus serratus L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 53: 247–261Google Scholar
- Stechow, E. (1919). Zur Kenntnis der Hydroidenfauna des Mittelmeeres, Amerikas und anderer Gebiete. Zool. Jb. (Abt.) Syst. Ökol. Geogr. Tiere) 42: 1–172Google Scholar