Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 365–373 | Cite as

STM investigations of PTCDA and PTCDI on graphite and MoS2. A systematic study of epitaxy and STM image contrast

  • C. Ludwig
  • B. Gompf
  • J. Petersen
  • R. Strohmaier
  • W. Eisenmenger
Original Contributions

Abstract

Monolayers of the organic molecules perylene-3,4,9,10-tetra-carboxylic-dianhydride (PTCDA) and diimide (PTCDI) on graphite and MoS2 have been imaged with scanning tunneling microscopy. The epitaxial growth of the two molecules is determined by the intermolecular interaction but nearly independent of the substrate. On both substrates the STM image contrast in the submolecularly resolved images is dominated by the aromatic perylene system whereas the polar oxygen and nitrogen groups are invisible. The correlation of the observed inner structure of the molecules to their molecular structure allows us to compare our results with theoretical considerations.

PACS

61.16 Di 68.55 Bd 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Möhwald, H.: Angew. Chem. Adv. Mater.100, 750 (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bain, C.D., Whitesides, G.M.: Angew. Chem. Adv. Mater.101, 522 (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zimmermann, U., Karl, N.: Surf. Sci.268, 296 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuchs, H., Ohst, H., Prass, W.: Adv. Mater.3, 10 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiang, S.: In: Scanning tunneling microscopy. Güntherodt, H.-J., Wiesendanger, R. (eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1992Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sautet, P., Joachim, C.: Ultramicroscopy42–44, 115 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mizutani, W., Shigeno, M., Kajimura, K., Ono, M.: Ultramicroscopy42–44, 236 (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spong, J.K., Mizes, H.A. LaComb, C.J., Dovek, M.M., Frommer, J.E., Foster, J.S.: Nature338, 137 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forrest, S.R., Leu, L.Y., So, F.F., Yoon, W.Y.: J. Appl. Phys.66, 5908 (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zimmermann, U., Schnitzler, G., Karl, N., Umbach, E.: Thin Solid Films175, 85 (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Umbach, E.: Prog. Surf. Sci.35, 113 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Möbus, M., Karl, N., Kobayashi, T.: J. Crystal. Growth16, 495 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ludwig, C., Gompf, B., Glatz, W., Petersen, J., Eisenmenger, W., Möbus, M., Zimmermann, U., Karl, N.: Z. Phys. B86, 397 (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lovinger, A.J., Forrest, S.R., Kaplan, M.L., Schmidt, P.H., Venkatesan, T.: J. Appl. Phys.55, 476 (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forrest, S.R., Kaplan, M.L., Schmidt, P.H.: J. Appl. Phys.55, 1492 (1984)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Isenmann, G., Sigmund, E.: Private communication (1993); similar results where obtained by Jung, M., Umbach, E.: (Private communication)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Ludwig
    • 1
  • B. Gompf
    • 1
  • J. Petersen
    • 1
  • R. Strohmaier
    • 1
  • W. Eisenmenger
    • 1
  1. 1.Physikalisches InstitutUniversität StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations