Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Stage III-recovery of cold worked high-purity aluminium determined with a low-temperature calorimeter

  • J. Schmidt
  • F. Haeßner
Article

Abstract

Using a low-temperature calorimeter annealing effects were investigated in high-purity aluminium of varying grades of purity (Al 99.99, Al 99.999 and Al 99.9999) which had been subjected to deformation by torsion at liquid nitrogen. For the purpose of comparison, some residual resistivity measurements were performed on deformed and quenched Al 99.999.

The calorimetric signals comprises two consecutive peaks (low-temperature peak and high-temperature peak) for each degree of deformation and purity. The low-temperature peak, with a maximum at 200 K-210 K, lies in the temperature range stage III, well-known from isochronous resistivity measurements. The effective activation energy of the annealing defects in this peak has the valueQm=0.62 eV/atom averaged over all degrees of deformation and purity, and is thus close to the known values of the activation energy of vacancy migration. Throughout the high-temperature peak, the position of which on the temperature scale depends strongly on the degree of deformation and purity, the processes of primaty recrystallization and dislocation recovery take place in the material. The coincidence of this peak with the changes of mechanical and electrical properties are in accordance with this interpretation. Thus to the usual nomenclature for isochronous resistance measurements, one may designate this peak a “stage V” reaction peak.

In this paper the particular results of the low-temperature peak (“stage III” peak) are analysed and discussed. Then the experimental data are compared with the literature data derived from other measuring procedures.

Keywords

Activation Energy Resistivity Measurement Resistance Measurement Stage Versus Annealing Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sassa, K., Petry, W., Vogl, G.: Philos. Mag. A48 (No. 1), 41–61 (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ceresara, S., Elkholy, H., Federighi, T.: Philos. Mag.12, 1105 (1965)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frois, C.: Acta Metall.14, 1325 (1966)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ceresara, S.: Philos. Mag.19, 99 (1969)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lugscheider, W., Breitenfellner, F., Lihl, F.: Z. Metallkd.59, 22 (1968)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hegazi, A., Kovács, I., Nagy, E.: Phys. Status Solidi33, 131 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kozinets, V.V.: Phys. Met. Metall.53 (No. 5), 136–138 (1982)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vostry', P., Haslar, V., Sprusil, B.: Mater. Sci. Forum15–18, 795–800 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wollenberger, H.J.: Point defects. In: Physical metallurgy. Cahn, R.W., Haasen, P. (eds.), p. 1139. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers 1983Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashimoto, E., Ono, K., Kino, T.: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.42, (No. 3), 868 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harvyama, O.: Jpn. Appl. Phys.20 (No. 9), 1641 (1981)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nasu, S., Preston, R.S., Gonser, U.: Mater. Sci. Forum15–18, 599–604 (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller, H.G.: Z. Phys. B—Condensed Matter47, 119–127 (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajainmäki, H., Linderoth, S., Nieminen, R.M., Hansen, H.E.: Mater. Sci. Forum15–18, 611–616 (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanazawa, I., Murakami, H., Doyama, M.: Mater. Sci. Forum15–18, 919–924 (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt, J.: Thermochim. Acta151, 333–344 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bueren, H.G. van: Z. Metallkd.46, 272 (1955)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haeßner, F., Schmidt, J.: Scr. Met.22, 1917 (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siegel, R.W.: J. Nucl. Mater.69,70, 117 (1978)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saada, G.: Acta Metall.9, 166, 965 (1961)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beukel, A. van den: Point defects in cold worked fcc metals. In: Vacancies and interstitials in metals. Seeger, A., Schumacher, D., Schilling, W., Diehl, J. (eds.), p. 427. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1970Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Balluffi, R.W.: J. Nucl. Mater.69, 70, 240 (1978)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haeßner, F., Schönborn, K.H.: Z. Metallkd.76, 198 (1985)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schönborn, K.H., Haeßner, F.: Thermochim. Acta86, 305–320 (1985)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sestak', J.: Thermophysical properties of solids. Their measurements and theoretical thermal analysis. In: Comprehensive analytical chemistry. Svehla, G. (ed.), Vol. XII, Part D, p. 212ff. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1984Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Christian, J.W.: The theory of transformations in metals and alloys. Part I: Equilibrium and general kinetic theory. Raynor, G.V. (ed.), p. 542ff. New York: Pergamon Press 1975Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seeger, A.: Moderne Probleme der Metallphysik. Seeger, A. (ed.) p. 245. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1965Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nihoul, J., Stals, L.: Phys. Status Solidi17, 295 (1966)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Streda, P.: Crystal Latt. Def.1, 229–235 (1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Schmidt
    • 1
  • F. Haeßner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für WerkstoffeTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations