Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 675–681

Relationship between enteral glucose load and adaptive mucosal growth in the small bowel

  • Elliot Weser
  • Joanna Babbitt
  • Ann Vandeventer
Original Articles

Abstract

Infusion of hyperosmolar glucose solutions into small bowel will prevent mucosal atrophy or stimulate mucosal growth in rats otherwise maintained on total parenteral nutrition (TPN). It is not certain whether this growth effect is related to the osmolarity of the solution or its total molecular load. Therefore, various concentrations of glucose and sodium salt solutions were studied for comparative effects on growth of small bowel mucosa. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (240 g) were maintained on TPN and infused continuously with either glucose or sodium choride (2 and 0.6 ml/hr) or sodium sulfate (0.6 ml/hr) via a catheter placed in the mid-small intestine. Concentrations of infusion solutions ranged in osmotic pressure from 300 to 1500 mosmol/liter. Controls were TPN rats without infusion of any solution. Over a seven-day period, TPN rats receiving mid-gut infusions of 300 mosM saline gained 18.4g in body weight. In TPN rats receiving mid-gut infusions of progressively greater concentrations of glucose, the additional total kilocalories per day resulted in greater body weight gain compared with the saline controls. After seven days, rats were killed, the small bowel removed, and divided into eight equal segments (segment 1, duodenum; segment 8, terminal ileum). Segment weight, mucosal weight, DNA, and protein concentration per segment were measured. Mid-gut infusions of 900 and 1500 mosM glucose solutions progressively increased mucosal mass in segments downstream from the site of infusion compared with 300 mosM glucose in water or 600 mosM glucose in saline which did not differ from any of the salt solutions or TPN alone. Increasing concentrations of the infused salt solutions were not accompanied by changes in mucosal mass and were similar to values found in rats without any infusion. The results suggest that mucosal growth is related to the molecular load of glucose and not to the osmolarity of the solution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Levine GM, Deren JJ, Steiger E, Zinno R: Role of oral intake in maintenance of gut mass and disaccharidase activity. Gastroenterology 67:975–982, 1974Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menge H, Werner H, Lorenz-Meyer H, Riecken E-O: The nutritive effect of glucose on the structure and function of jejunal self-emptying blind loops in the rat. Gut 16:462–467, 1975Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spector MH, Levine GM, Deren JJ: Direct and indirect effects of dextrose and amino acids on gut mass. Gastroenterology 72:706–710, 1977Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eastwood GL: Small bowel morphology and epithelial proliferation in intravenously alimented rabbits. Surgery 82:613–620, 1977Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spector MH, Traylor J, Young EA, Weser E: Stimulation of mucosal growth by gastric and ileal infusion of single amino acids in parenterally nourished rats. Digestion 21:33–40, 1981Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weser E, Tawil T, Fletcher JT: Stimulation of small bowel mucosal growth by gastric infusion of different sugars in rats maintained on total parenteral nutrition.In Mechanisms of Intestinal Adaptation. (Falk Symposium 30). JWL Robinson, RH Dowling, E-O Riecken (eds). Lancaster, England, MTP Press, 1982, pp 141–149Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dowling RH, Feldman EJ, McNaughton J, Peters TJ: Importance of luminal nutrition for intestinal adaptation following small bowel resection. Digestion 10:216–217, 1974Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feldman EJ, Dowling RH, McNaughton J, Peters TJ: Effects of oral vs intravenous nutrition on intestinal adaptation after small bowel resection. Gastroenterology 70:712–719, 1976Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levine GM, Deren JJ, Yezdimir E: Small bowel resection. Oral intake is the stimulus for hyperplasia. Am J Dig Dis 21:542–546, 1976Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morin CL, Ling V, Van Callie M: Role of oral intake on intestinal adaptation after small bowel resection in growing rats. Pediatr Res 12:268–271, 1978Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark RM: Evidence of both luminal and systemic factors in the control of rat intestinal epithelial replacement. Clin Sci 50:139–144, 1976Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weser E, Vandeventer A, Tawil T: Stimulation of small bowel mucosal growth by midgut infusion of different sugars in rats maintained by total parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1:411–416, 1982Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steiger E, Vars HM, Dudrick SJ: A technique of long-term intravenous feeding in unrestrained rats. Arch Surg 104:330–332, 1972Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Croft DN, Lubran M: The estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid in the presence of sialic acid: Application to analysis of human gastric washings. Biochem J 95:612–620, 1965Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275, 1951Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steel RDG, Torrie JH (eds): Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1960, pp 107–109Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clark RM: “Luminal nutrition” versus “functional work load” as controllers of mucosal morphology and epithelial replacement in rat small intestine. Digestion 15:411–424, 1977Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richter GC, Levine GM, Shiau YF: Effects of luminal glucose versus nonnutritive infusates on jejunal mass and absorption in the rat. Gastroenterology 85:1105–1120, 1983Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weser E, Vandeventer A, Tawil T: Nonhormonal regulation of intestinal adaptation. Scand J Gastroenterol 17(Suppl 74):105–113, 1982Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weser E, Babbitt J, Vandeventer A: Effect of α-glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose) on sucrose-induced intestinal adaptation in TPN rats. Clin Res 31:767A, 1983Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morin CL, Grey VL: Influence of lipid on intestinal adaptation after resection.In Mechanisms of Intestinal Adaptation (Falk Symposium 30). JWL Robinson, RH Dowling, E-O Riecken (eds). Lancaster, England, MTP Press, 1982, pp 175–185Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elliot Weser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joanna Babbitt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ann Vandeventer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical ServiceAudie L. Murphy Veterans HospitalSan Antonio
  2. 2.University of Texas Health Science CenterSan Antonio

Personalised recommendations