Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 15–48 | Cite as

The rate of surplus value and crime. A theoretical and empirical examination of Marxian economic theory and criminology

  • Michael J. Lynch
  • W. Byron Groves
  • Alan Lizotte
Article

Abstract

Radical criminology is often dismissed on the claim that it is not empirically verifiable. In this paper we argue that grounding the radical approach in Marx's theory of surplus values creates an empirically testable Marxian theory applicable to understanding rates of criminal offending and official responses to criminal behavior. Our analysis demonstrates that the rate of surplus value is a statistically significant predictor of the rate of property crimes known, property crime arrests, violent crimes known, violent crime arrests and total index crimes known to police in the U.S. from 1950 to 1974 controlling for the effects of predictor variables identified in earlier research on crime rates. The theoretical implications of this finding and the importance of the theory of surplus value to the development of radical criminology are also discussed.

Keywords

Predictor Variable Early Research Crime Rate International Relation Violent Crime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson, Christopher, “Toward a Marxian Penology: Captive Criminal Populations as Economic Threats and Resources,”Social Problems 1984(31: 4), 435–458.Google Scholar
  2. Adamson, Christopher, “Punishment After Slavery: Southern State Penal Systems, 1865–1880,”Social Problems, 1983 (30: 5), 555–569.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, Jeffrey, “A Historical Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy,”Criminology, 1989 (277: 2), 209–229.Google Scholar
  4. Adler, Jeffrey, “Vagging the Demons and Scoundrels: Vagrancy and the Growth of St. Louis, 1830–1861.”Journal of Urban History, 1986 (13), 3–30.Google Scholar
  5. Alcaly, Roger and Sidney Morgenbesser, “Surplus Value: The Oft Neglected Argument,”Social Research, 1979 (46: 2), 282–290.Google Scholar
  6. Allan, Emile Andersen and Darrell Steffensmeier, “Youth, Underemployment and Property Crime,”American Sociological Review, 1989 (54: 1), 107–123.Google Scholar
  7. Amsden, Alice, “An International Comparison of the Rate of Surplus Value in Manufacturing Industries,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1989 (5: 3), 229–249.Google Scholar
  8. Balkan, Sheila, Ronald Berger and Janet Schmidt,Crime and Deviance in America (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1980).Google Scholar
  9. Baran, Paul and Paul Sweezy,Monopoly Capitalism (NY: Modern Reader Paperbacks, 1966).Google Scholar
  10. Barnett, Harold, “Wealth, Crime and Capital Accumulation,” in D. Greenberg (ed.)Crime and Capitalism (Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1981a).Google Scholar
  11. —, “Corporate Capitalism, Corporate Crime,”Crime and Delinquency, 1981a (27: 1), 4–23.Google Scholar
  12. Belsey, David and Roy E. Welsch,Regression Diagnostics (NY: Wiley and Sons, 1980).Google Scholar
  13. Blake, William J.,Marxian Economic Theory and its Criticism. (NY: Cordon Company, 1939).Google Scholar
  14. Blau, Judith and Peter Blau, “The Cost of Inequality: Metropolitan Structures and Violent Crime,”American Sociological Review, 1982 (47), 114–129.Google Scholar
  15. Bohm, Robert, “Beyond Unemployment: Toward a Radical Solution to the Crime Problem,”Crime and Social Justice, 1985 (21/22), 213–222.Google Scholar
  16. Bohm-Bawerk, Eugen von,Karl Marx and the Close of His System, (NY: A.M. Kelly, 1896 [1966].Google Scholar
  17. Box, Steven,Recession, Crime and Punishment (Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Nobles, 1987).Google Scholar
  18. Box, Steven,Power, Crime and Mystification (London: Tavistock, 1984).Google Scholar
  19. Braverman, Harry,Labor and Monopoly Capital (NY: Monthly Review Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  20. Burowoy, Michael,Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  21. Cantor, David and Kenneth Land, “Unemployment and Crime Rates in the post-world War II United States,”American Sociological Review, 1985 (50), 317–332.Google Scholar
  22. Chambliss, William, “The Law of Vagrancy,” in W.J. Chambliss (ed.)Criminal Law in Action (NY: John Wiley, 1984).Google Scholar
  23. Chambliss, William, “A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy,”Social Problems, 1964 (12), 67–77.Google Scholar
  24. Chiricos, Theodore G., “Rates of Crime and Unemployment: An Analysis of Aggregate Research Evidence,”Social Problems, 1987 (34: 2), 187–212.Google Scholar
  25. Christ, C.S.,Econometric Models and Methods (NY: Wiley, 1966).Google Scholar
  26. Colvin, M. and J. Pauly, “A Critique of Criminology: Toward an Integrated Structural-Marxist Theory of Delinquency Production,”American Journal of Sociology, 1983 (90: 3), 513–551.Google Scholar
  27. Cohen, Bernard, “Reporting Crime: The Limits of Statistical and Field Data,” in A.S. Blumberg (ed.),Current Perspectives on Criminal Behavior (NY: Knopf, 1981).Google Scholar
  28. Cohen, Lawrence and Marcus Felson, “Social Change and Crime rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach,”American Sociological Review, 1979 (44), 588–608.Google Scholar
  29. Cohen, Lawrence E., Marcus Felson and Kenneth Land, “Property Crime Rates in the United States: A Macrodynamic Analysis, 1974–1977; with Ex-Ante Forecasts for the Mid-1980s,”American Journal of Sociology, 1980 (86), 90–118.Google Scholar
  30. Cueno, Carl J., “Reconfirming Karl Marx's Rate of Surplus Value,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1984 (21: 1), 98–104.Google Scholar
  31. —, “Class Struggle and the Measurement of the Rate of Surplus Value,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1982 (19: 3), 377–425.Google Scholar
  32. —, “Class Exploitation in Canada.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1978 (15: 3), 284–300.Google Scholar
  33. Cullen, Frank,Rethinking Crime and Deviance Theory (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1984).Google Scholar
  34. Currie, Elliot,Confronting Crime (New York: Pantheon, 1985).Google Scholar
  35. Currie, Elliot and Jerome Skolnick,America's Problems (Boston: Little, Brown, 1984).Google Scholar
  36. Desai, Meghand,Marxian Economic (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1979).Google Scholar
  37. Durbin, J., “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables,”Econometrica, 1970 (38), 410–421.Google Scholar
  38. Emmerson, R.J. and P.N. Rowe, “Professor Cueno's Analysis of Class Exploitation in Canada,”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 1982 (19: 2), 279–289.Google Scholar
  39. Engels, Fredrick,Anti-Duhring (Moscow: Progress, 1975 [1894]).Google Scholar
  40. —,The Conditions of the Working Class in England Moscow: Progress, 1973 [1845].Google Scholar
  41. Felson, Marcus and Lawrence E. Cohen, “Modeling Crime Rate Trends — A Criminal Opportunity Perspective,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1981 (18), 138–164.Google Scholar
  42. Fisher, Joseph and Robert L. Mason, “The Analysis of Multicollinear Data in Criminology,” in J. Fox (ed.),Methods in Quantitative Criminology (NY: Academic Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  43. Fox, James Alan,Forecasting Crime Data (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1978).Google Scholar
  44. Frank, Nancy and Michael J. Lynch,Corporate Crime, Corporate Violence (New York: Harrow and Heston, 1992).Google Scholar
  45. Glyn, A. and B. Sutcliffe, British Capitalism, Workers and the Profit Squeeze (Harmondsworth: Penguin Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  46. Greenberg, David, “Age, Crime and Social Explanation.” American Journal of Sociology, 1985 (91:1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  47. —,Crime and Capitalism (Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1981).Google Scholar
  48. —, “The Dynamics of Oscillatory Punishment Processes,”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1977 (68: 4), 643–651.Google Scholar
  49. Groves, W. Byron, “Marxism and Positivism,”Crime and Social Justice, 1985; 23: 129–150.Google Scholar
  50. Groves, W. Byron and Michael J. Lynch, “Reconciling Structural and Subjective Approaches to the Study of Crime,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1990 (27: 4), 348–375.Google Scholar
  51. Groves, W. Byron and Robert Sampson, “Traditional as Radical Criminology,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1987 (24: 3), 181–214.Google Scholar
  52. Groves, W. Byron and Nancy Frank, “Punishment and the Sociology of Structured Choice,” in W.B. Groves and G.R. Newman (eds.),Punishment and Privilege (NY: Harrow and Heston, 1987).Google Scholar
  53. Groves, W. Byron and Charles Corrado, “Culture as Metaphysics: An Appraisal of Cultural Models,”Crime and Social Justice, 1983 (20), 99–120.Google Scholar
  54. Habermas, Jurgen,Legitimation Crises (Boston: Beacon, 1977).Google Scholar
  55. Hagan, John, A.R. Gillis and John Simpson, “Class in the Household: A Power-Control Theory of Gender and Delinquency,”American Journal of Sociology, 1987 (92), 788–816.Google Scholar
  56. Hagan, John, A.R. Gillis and John Simpson, “The Class Structure of Gender and Delinquency: Toward a Power-Control Theory of Common Delinquent Behavior,”American Journal of Sociology, 1985 (90), 1151–1178.Google Scholar
  57. Harring, Sidney,Policing a Class Society (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  58. Harring, Sidney, “Class Conflict and the Suppress of Tramps in Buffalo, 1892–1894,”Law and Society Review, 1977, (11: 5), 873–911.Google Scholar
  59. Hindus, Michael S.,Prison and Plantation: Crime, Justice and Authority in Massachusetts and South Carolina (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  60. Hirschi, Travis,Causes of Delinquency (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  61. Hirschi, Travis and Michael Gottfredson, “Age and Crime,”American Journal of Sociology, 1983 (89: 3), 552–584.Google Scholar
  62. Inciardi, James,Radical Criminology: The Coming Crises (Beverly Hills, Sage, 1980).Google Scholar
  63. Issac, Larry W. and Larry J. Griffin, “A historicism in Time-Series Analyses of Historical Processes: Critique, Redirection and Illustrations from U.S. Labor History,”American Sociological Review, 1989 (54: 6), 873–890.Google Scholar
  64. Jacobs, David, “Inequality and Police Strength,”American Sociological Review, 1979 (44), 913–924.Google Scholar
  65. Jacobs, David and D. Brill, “Inequality and Police Use of Deadly Force: An Empirical Assessment of the Conflict Hypothesis,”Social Problems, 1979 (26), 403–411.Google Scholar
  66. Jankovic, Ivan, “Labor Markets and Imprisonment,” in T. Platt and P. Takagi's (eds.),Punishment and Penal Discipline (San Francisco: Synthesis Press, 1982a).Google Scholar
  67. —, “Social Class and Criminal Sentencing,” in T. Platt and P. Takagi's (eds.),Punishment and Penal Discipline (San Francisco: Synthesis Press, 1982b).Google Scholar
  68. Klockars, Carl, “The Contemporary Crisis of Marxist Criminology,” in J. Inciardi's (ed.),Radical Criminology (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980).Google Scholar
  69. Land, Kenneth and Marcus Felson, “A General Framework for Building Dynamic Marco Social Indicator Models: Including an Analysis of Change in Crime Rates and Police Expenditures,”American Journal of Sociology, 1976 (82), 565–604.Google Scholar
  70. Lizotte, Alan, “Extra-Legal Factors in Chicago's Criminal Courts: Testing the Conflict Model of Criminal Justice,”Social Problems 1978 (25), 564–580.Google Scholar
  71. Lizotte, Alan, James Mercy and Eric Monkkonen, “Crime and Police Strength in an Urban Setting,” in J. Hagan's (ed.)Quantitative Criminology (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982).Google Scholar
  72. Lynch, Michael J., “The Extraction of Surplus Value, Crime and Punishment: A Preliminary Examination,”Contemporary Crises, 1988 (12), 329–344.Google Scholar
  73. —, “Quantitative Analysis and Marxist Criminology,”Crime and Social Justice, 1987 (29), 110–127.Google Scholar
  74. Lynch, Michael J. and W. Byron Groves, A Primer in Radical Criminology, second edition (New York: Harrow and Heston, 1989).Google Scholar
  75. Lynch, Michael J., E. Britt Patterson and J. Santiago Nunez, The Rate of Surplus Value, the Organic Composition of Capital, the Marxian Rate of Profit and Crime in the U.S., 1960–1988. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Denver, Colorado, 1990.Google Scholar
  76. Mandel, Ernest,Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975).Google Scholar
  77. Marquardt, D., “Generalized Inverse Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation and Nonlinear Estimation,”Technometrics, 1970 (12), 591–612.Google Scholar
  78. Marx, Karl,Capital, Volume II (NY: International, 1981a).Google Scholar
  79. —,Capital, Volume III (NY: International, 1981b).Google Scholar
  80. —,The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, D.J. Struik (ed.) (NY: International, 1975).Google Scholar
  81. —,Capital, Volume I (N.Y.: New World Paperbacks, 1974).Google Scholar
  82. —,Theories of Surplus Value, Volume I, Volume II, and Volume III, (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969a, b, c).Google Scholar
  83. McDowall, David and Colin Loftin, “Fiscal Politics and the Police: Detroit, 1928–1976,”Social Forces, 1986 (65: 1), 162–176.Google Scholar
  84. Monkkonen, Eric H., “Regional Dimensions of Tramping, North and South, 1880–1910,” in E.H. Monkkonen (ed.),Walking to Work: Tramps in America, 1970–1935 (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  85. Monkkonen, Eric, “A Disorderly People? Urban Order in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,”Journal of American History, 1981 (68), 539–559.Google Scholar
  86. Moseley, Fred, “The Rate of Surplus Value in the Postwar US Economy: A Critique of Weisskopf's Estimates,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1985 (9), 57–79.Google Scholar
  87. Neter, John, W. Wasserman and M.H. Kutner,Applied Linear Statistical Models (Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin Inc., 1983).Google Scholar
  88. Nettler, Gwynn,Explaining Crime (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1984).Google Scholar
  89. O'Connor, James, Accumulation Crisis (NY: Basil-Black, 1986).Google Scholar
  90. O'Connor, James,The Fiscal Crisis of the State (NY: St. Martins Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  91. Offe, Claus,Disorganized Capitalism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  92. Perlow, Victor,Super Profits and Crisis: Modern U.S. Capitalism (NY: International, 1988).Google Scholar
  93. Pindyck, Robert and Daniel Rubinfeld,Econometrics and Models for Economic Forecasts (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1981).Google Scholar
  94. Quinney, Richard,Class, State and Crime (NY: Longman, 1980).Google Scholar
  95. —,Criminology (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979).Google Scholar
  96. Rusche, Georg and Otto Kirchheimer,Punishment and Social Structure (NY: Russel and Russell, 1968 [1939].Google Scholar
  97. Shichor, David, “The New Criminology: Some Critical Issues,”British Journal of Criminology, 1980 20: 1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  98. Spitzer, Steven, “Toward a Marxian Theory of Deviance,” in D. Kelly's (ed.),Criminal Behavior (NY: St. Martins, 1980).Google Scholar
  99. Sweezy, Paul,Capitalist Development (NY: Modern Paperback Readers, 1942).Google Scholar
  100. Sweezy, Paul and Harry Magdoff, “Capitalism and Unemployment,”Monthly Review, 1982 (27), 1–14.Google Scholar
  101. Varley, D., “On the Computation of the Rate of Surplus Value,”Science and Society, 1938 (11: 3), 393–396.Google Scholar
  102. Weisskopf, Thomas E., “The Rate of Surplus Value in the Postwar US Economy: A Response to Moseley's Critique,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1985 (9), 81–84.Google Scholar
  103. —, “Marxian Crisis Theory and the Rate of Profit in the US Economy,”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1979 (3), 341–378.Google Scholar
  104. Wright, Erik Olin,Class, Crisis and the State (NY: Vesco, 1982).Google Scholar
  105. —,Classes (London: Vesco, 1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Lynch
    • 1
  • W. Byron Groves
    • 2
  • Alan Lizotte
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFlorida State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Humanistic StudiesUniversity of Wisconsin-Green BayUSA
  3. 3.School of Criminal JusticeState University of New York at AlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations