“Do Winograd and Flores have politics?”

  • David Bogen
Commentary Section Commentary

Key words

ontology communicative efficacy efficiency politics speech acts ethnomethodology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Callon, Michel (1986): Some elements in the politics of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. InPower, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, ed. John Law, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 196–233.Google Scholar
  2. Flores, Fernando, M. Graves, B. Hartfield and T. Winograd (1988): Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction.ACM Transactions of Office Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
  3. Habermas, Jürgen (1977): A review of Gadamer'sTruth and Method. InUnderstanding and Social Inquiry, eds. Fred Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 335–363.Google Scholar
  4. Habermas, Jürgen (1984):The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. I, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Thomas McCarthy (trans.) Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, Jürgen (1984):The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol II, Lifeworld and System. Thomas McCarthy (trans.) Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jayyusi, Lena (1984):Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  7. Latour, Bruno (1988):The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lynch, Michael (1985): Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility.Social Studies of Science, vol. 15, pp. 37–66.Google Scholar
  9. Sacks, Harvey (1972a): An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. InStudies in Social Interaction, ed., David Sudnow, New York: Free Press, pp. 31–74.Google Scholar
  10. Sacks, Harvey (1972b): On the analyzability of stories by children. In:Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnorgraphy of Communication, eds. J.J. Gumperz and Delt Hymes, New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, pp. 329–345.Google Scholar
  11. Searle, John R (1969):Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Suchman, Lucy (1994): Do categories have politics?: The language/action perspective reconsidered.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 2, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
  13. Winograd, Terry (1994) Categories disciplines and social coordination.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 2, pp. 191–197.Google Scholar
  14. Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores (1986):Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Reading MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Bogen
    • 1
  1. 1.Humanities and Social SciencesEmerson College, BostonBostonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations