Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 86–92 | Cite as

Fasting and postprandial mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

  • Salvatore Cucchiara
  • Mauro Bortolotti
  • Raffaele Minella
  • Salvatore Auricchio
Original Articles

Abstract

In order to define the mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children, we performed simultaneous intraluminal, esophageal motility and pH studies in 24 children with symptomatic reflux and abnormal prolonged pH probe study, ten (group A) without endoscopic and histologic esophagitis, 14 (group B) with endoscopic and histologic esophagitis. Median (ranges) age (years) was 5.0 (6 months-10 years) and 3.0 (6 months-12 years), respectively. Recordings were done for 1 hr before and 1 hr after feeding apple juice (15 ml/kg; pH 4.0). All episodes of GER in group A patients and 77.1% in group B patients were accounted for by abrupt transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR); 22.9% of reflux events in group B patients occurred during gradual drifts of LES pressure (LESP) to undetectable levels. Esophageal refluxate exposure (mean percentage time with esophageal pH<4.0) the rate of TLESR (number of episodes/hr), and the percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux significantly increased in the fed period both in group A (18.5±5.4%, 6.2±2.65, 87.1%) and in group B (29.7±6.5 7.8±3.05, 84.9%) as compared to the fasting state (group A: 10.8±3.9, 3.9±3.17, 46.1%; group B: 16.1±2.6, 4.14±3.06, 55.17%) (p<0.01). The rate of LESP drifts (number of episodes/hr) was also significantly higher postprandially (4.85±1.24 vs 1.8±0.9,p<0.01); furthermore there was a postfeeding increase of the LESP drift percentage associated with reflux (79.41% vs 46.15%,p<0.01). Residual pressure of TLESRs associated with reflux was significantly lower than that of TLESRs without GER in both groups of patients, during fasting (group A:p<0.01; group B:p<0.05) and fed state (p<0.05), whereas duration of relaxation and LESP in the 1-min period before each TLESR did not discriminate TLESRs associated with reflux from those without reflux. In children with GER disease, TLESR is the most common mechanism of reflux, but gradual LESP drift is associated with more severe disease; the postprandial increase in the esophageal acid exposure is mainly due to increased rate of TLESRs and LESP drifts; degree of sphincter inhibition during TLESRs is a critical factor for the induction of reflux.

Key Words

gastroesophageal reflux disease lower esophageal sphincter pressure drift transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, et al: Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 65:256–267, 1980Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holloway RH, Orenstein SR: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in adults and children. Baillière's Clin Gastroenterol 5:337–370, 1991Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dent J, Holloway RH, Toouli J, Dodds WJ: Mechanisms of lower oesophageal sphincter incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 29:1020–1028, 1988Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Werlin SL, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC: Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. J Pediatr 85:607–612, 1980Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cucchiara S, Staiano A, Di Lorenzo C, De Luca G, Della Rocca A, Auricchio S: Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux and distal esophageal motility in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 7:830–836, 1988Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahony MJ, Migliavacca M, Spitz L, Milla PJ: Motor disorders of the oesophagus in gastro-oesophageal reflux. Arch Dis Child 63:1334–1338, 1988Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cucchiara S, Staiano A, Gobio Casali L, Boccieri A, Paone FM: Value of the 24 hour intraoesophageal pH monitoring in children. Gut 31:129–133, 1990Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mittal RK, McCallum RW: Characteristics and frequency of transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 95:593–599 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dent J, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Toouli J: Factors that influence induction of gastroesophageal reflux in normal human subjects. Dig Dis Sci 33:270–275, 1988Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin CJ, Patrikios J, Dent J: Abolition of gas reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation by vagal blockade in the dog. Gastroenterology 91:890–896, 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cox MR, Martin CJ, Westmore M, Dent J: Effect of general anaesthesia on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in the dog. Gastroenterology 92:1357, 1987Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holloway RH, Bryant Wyman J, Dent J: Failure of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in response to gastric distension in patients with achalasia: evidence for neural mediation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations. Gut 30:762–767, 1989Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holloway RH, Hongo M, Berger K, McCallum RW: Gastric distension: a mechanism for postprandial gastroesophageal reflux. Gastroenterology 89:779–784, 1985Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atkinson M: Monitoring oesophageal pH. Gut 28:509–514, 1987Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paterson WG, Rattan S, Goyal RK: Experimental induction of isolated lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in anesthetized opossum. J Clin Invest 77:1187–1193, 1986Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diamant NE: Physiology of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterol Clin Am 18:179–194, 1989Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Cucchiara
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mauro Bortolotti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raffaele Minella
    • 1
    • 2
  • Salvatore Auricchio
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, 2nd School of MedicineUniversity of NaplesNapoliItaly
  2. 2.Medical ClinicsUniversity of BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations