Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 75–85 | Cite as

Pneumatic dilatation or esophagomyotomy treatment for idiopathic achalasia: Clinical outcomes and cost analysis

  • Henry P. Parkman
  • James C. Reynolds
  • Ann Ouyang
  • Ernest F. Rosato
  • John M. Eisenberg
  • Sidney Cohen
Original Articles
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

The choice between pneumatic dilatation and surgical esophagomyotomy as the initial treatment for achalasia is controversial. The aims of this study were to determine the long term clinical outcome and costs of treating achalasia initially with pneumatic dilatation as compared to esophagomyotomy. Of 123 patients undergoing an initial pneumatic dilatation for achalasia at our institution from 1976 to 1986, 71 (58%) received no further treatment for achalasia during a mean follow up of 4.7±2.8 years. Only 15 of these 123 patients (12%) eventually underwent surgical esophagomyotomy, (two for perforation during pneumatic dilatation, 13 for persistent or recurrent symptoms). The degree of dysphagia at follow up was improved to a similar degree in patients treated with an initial pneumatic dilatation as compared to patients treated with an initial esophagomyotomy. Patients with age≥45, years at time of initial pneumatic dilatation had fewer subsequent treatments for persistent or recurrent symptoms and had less dysphagia on follow up as compared to patients <45 years. Subsequent pneumatic dilatations to treat persistent or recurrent symptoms were less beneficial than an initial pneumatic dilation. The cost of esophagomyotomy was 5 times greater than the cost of pneumatic dilatation. When costs were analyzed to include subsequent treatments of symptomatic patients, the total expectant costs of treating with an initial esophagomyotomy remained 2.4 times greater than treating with an initial pneumatic dilatation. This study suggests that an initial pneumatic dilatation will be the only treatment needed for the majority of patients with achalasia. A treatment regimen starting with penumatic dilatation has less overall costs than starting with esophagomyotomy. For each subsequent pneumatic dilatation, however, the clinical benefit leans toward, surgery.

Key Words

esophagus esophageal motility disorders esophagomyotomy cost analysis 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vantrappen G, Janssens J: To dilate or to operate? That is the question. Gut 24:1013–1019, 1983Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donahue PE, Schlesinger PK, Bombeck CT, Samelson S, Nyhus LM: Achalasia of the esophagus-Treatment controversies and the method of choice: Ann Surg 203:505–510, 1986Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferguson MK: Achalasia: Current evaluation and therapy: Ann Thorac Surg 52:336–342, 1991Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vantrappen G, Hellemans J: Treatment of achalasia and related motor disorders. Gastroenterology 79:144–154, 1980Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csendes A, Braghetto I, Hendriquez A, Cortes C: Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia. Gut 30:299–304, 1989Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sauer L, Pellegrini CA, Way LW: The treatment of achalasia—A current perspective. Arch Surg 124:929–932, 1989Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reynolds JC, Parkman HP: Achalasia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 18:223–255, 1989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisenberg JM: Clinical economics—A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA 262:2879–2886, 1989Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen S, Lipshutz W: Lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction in achalasia. Gastroenterology 61:814–820, 1971Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Browne DC, McHardy G: A new instrument for use in esophagospasm. JAMA 113:1963, 1939Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee CA, Reynolds JC, Ouyang A, Baker L, Cohen S: Esophageal chest pain—Value of high-dose provocative testing with edrophonium chloride in patients with normal esophageal manometries. Dig Dis Sci 32:682–688, 1987Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reidel WL, Clouse RE: Variations in clinical presentation of patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities. Dig Dis Sci 30:1065–1071, 1985Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisenberg JM, Kitz DS: Savings from outpatient antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis-Economic analysis of a therapeutic strategy. JAMA 255:1584–1588, 1986Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Finkler SA: The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med 96:102–109, 1982Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs. Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eisenberg JM, Glick H, Hillman AL, Baron J, Finkler SA, Hershey JC, Lavizzo-Mourey R, Buzby GP: Measuring the economic impact of perioperative total parenteral nutrition: Principles and design. Am J Clin Nutr 47:382–391, 1988Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agha FP, Lee HH: The esophagus after endoscopic pneumatic balloon dilatation for achalasia. AJR 146:25–29, 1986Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosato EF, Acker M, Curcillo PG, Reilly R, Reynolds J: Transabdominal esophagomyotomy and partial fundoplication for treatment of achalasia. Surg, Gynecol Obstet 173:137–141, 1991Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slater G, Sicular AA: Esophageal perforations after forceful dilatation in achalasia. Ann Surg 195:186–188, 1982Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Snedecor GW, Cochran WG: Statistical Methods. Ames, The Iowa State University Press, 1980Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee ET: Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Belmont, Lifetime Learning Publications, 1980Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muenz LR: Comparing survival distributions. Cancer Invest 1:455–466, 1983Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weinstein MC: Economic assessments of medical practices and technologies Med Dec Making 1:309–330, 1981Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dellipiani AW, Hewetson KA: Pneumatic dilatation in the management of achalasia: Experience of 45 cases. Quart J Med 277:253–258, 1986Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robertson CS, Fellows IW, Mayberry JF, Atkinson M: Choice of therapy for achalasia in relation to age. Digestion 40:244–250, 1988Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fellows IW, Ogilvie AL, Atkinson M: Pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Gut 24:1020–1023, 1983Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nair L, Reynolds JC, Parkman HP, Strom B, Tsao P, Wirth F, Katzka DA, Ouyang A, Ogorek CP, Rothstein R, Cohen S, Rosato EF: Complications of pneumatic dilatation: Risks, identification and outcome (abstract). Gastroenterology 95:880, 1988Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vantrappen G, Hellemans J, Deloof W, Valembois P, Vandenbroucke J: Treatment of achalasia with pneumatic dilatations. Gut 12:268–275, 1971Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richter JE: Achalasia: Whether the knife or balloon? Not such a difficult question. Am J Gastroenterol 86:810–811, 1991Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shepard DS, Thompson MS: First principles of costeffectiveness analysis in health. Public Health Rep 94:535–543, 1979Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cox J, Buckton GK, Bennett JR: Balloon dilatation in achalasia: A new dilator. Gut 27:986–989, 1986Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stark GA, Castell DO, Richter JE, Wu WC: Prospective randomized comparison of Brown-McHardy and Microvasive balloon dilators in treatment of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1322–1326, 1990Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gelfand MD, Kozarek RA: An experience with polyethylene balloons for pneumatic dilation in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 84:924–927, 1989Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fried RL, Rosenberg S, Goyal R: Perforation rate in achalasia with polyethylene balloon dilators. Gastrointest Endosc 37:405, 1991Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barkin JS, Guelrud M, Reiner DK, Goldberg RI, Phillips RS: Forceful balloon dilation: an outpatient procedure for achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 36:123–126, 1990Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shimi S, Nathanson LK, Cuschieri A: Laparoscopic cardiomyotomy for achalasia. J R Coll Surg Edin 36:152–154, 1991Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stipa S, Fegiz G, Iascone C, Paolini A, Moraldi A, de Marchi C, Chieco PA: Heller-Belsey and Heller-Nissen operations for achalasia of the esophagus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:212–216, 1990Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ellis FH, Crozier RE, Watkins E: Operation for esophageal achalasia—Results of esophagomyotomy without an antireflux operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 88:344–351, 1984Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Little AG, Soriano A, Ferguson MK, Winans CS, Skinner DB: Surgical treatment of achalasia: Results with esophagomyotomy and Belsey repair. Ann Thorac Surg 45:489–494, 1988Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry P. Parkman
    • 1
  • James C. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Ann Ouyang
    • 1
  • Ernest F. Rosato
    • 1
  • John M. Eisenberg
    • 1
  • Sidney Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Pennsylvania Medical CenterPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations