Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and nuclei

, Volume 344, Issue 2, pp 197–204 | Cite as

Subthreshold production of K+ mesons and the fragmentation of the target nucleus

  • H. Müller
  • K. Sistemich
Hadron Physics

Abstract

The interplay between subthreshold K+-production and the fragmentation of the target nucleus is considered in proton-nucleus interactions at projectile energies between 0.8 and 1 GeV. Inclusive data for the production of K+ mesons and of fragments are well described in the framework of the modified phase space model. For a coincidence measurement between K+ mesons and fragments the model predicts a decrease of the relative yield of intermediate mass fragments by about four orders of magnitude. This strong decrease is a consequence of energy-momentum conservation, because at subthreshold energies a second endothermic process like multifragmentation can hardly proceed simultaneously with the K+ production. A K+ meson is, therefore, expected to be accompanied by a heavy target residue, which is so weakly excited that it may evaporate a few nucleons but cannot decay into fragments. Due to the large energy and momentum transfer in this process the strength of the predicted effect is supposed to be sensitive to the details of the reaction dynamics.

PACS

25.40.Ve 25.10.+s 25.90.+k 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Koptev, V.P., Mikirtychyants, S.M., Nesterov, M.M., Tarasov, N.A., Shcherbakov, G.V., Abrosimov, N.K., Volchenkov, V.A., Gridnev, A.B., Eliseev, V.A., Ivanov, E.M., Kruglov, S.P., Malov, Yu.A., Ryabov, G.A.: Zh. Ehksp. Teor. Fiz. 94, 1 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassing, W., Batko, G., Mosel, U., Niita, K., Schult, O., Wolf, Gy.: Phys. Lett. B 238, 25 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Müller, H.: Z. Phys. A — Atomic Nuclei 336, 103 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Müller, H.: Z. Phys. A — Atomic Nuclei 339, 409 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shmakov, S.Yu., Uzhinski, V.V., Zadorozhny, A.M.: Comput. Phys. Commun. 54, 125 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bialas, A., Bleszynski, M., Czyz, W.: Acta Phys. Pol. B 8, 389 (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bialas, A., Czyz, W.: Acta Phys. Pol. B 12, 459 (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pajares, C., Ramallo, A.V.: Phys. Rev. D 31, 2800 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glauber, R.J., Mathiae, G.: Nucl. Phys. B 21, 135 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knoll, J.: Phys. Rev. C 20, 773 (1979)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bohrmann, S., Knoll, J.: Nucl. Phys. A 356, 498 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Capella, A., Tran, Thanh Van: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 10, 249 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anisovich, V.V., Shekhter, V.M.: Nucl. Phys. B 55, 455 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lynch, W.G.: Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 493 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byckling, E., Kajantie, K.: Particle kinematics. New York, London, Sydney: Wiley 1973Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Auguilar-Benitez, M. et al.: Phys. Lett. B 239, 1 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barz, H.W., Bondorf, J.P., Schulz, H.: Nucl. Phys. A 462, 742 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bondorf, J., Donangelo, R., Mishustin, I.N., Schulz, H.: Nucl. Phys. A 444, 460 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bondorf, J.P., Donangelo, R., Mishustin, I.N., Pethick, C.J., Schulz, H., Sneppen, K.: Nucl. Phys. A 443, 321 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gross, D.H.E.: Nucl. Phys. A 488, 217c (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Flamino, V., Moorhead, W.G., Morrison, D.R.O., Rivoire, N.: Preprint CERN-HERA 84-01, Geneva (1984)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wroblewski, A.: Acta Phys. Pol. B 16, 379 (1985)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Busza, W.: In: High-Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure, 1975. AIP Conference Proceedings 26. Nagle, D.E., Borman, R.L., Storms, B.G., Goldhaber, A.F., Hargrave, C.K. (eds.), p. 211. New York: American Institute of Physics 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andronenko, L.N., Kotov, A.A., Vaishnene, L.A., Neubert, W., Barz, H.W., Bondorf, J.P., Donangelo, R., Schulz, H.: Phys. Lett. B 174, 18 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ogilvie, C.A., Adloff, J.C., Begemann-Blaich, M., Bouissou, P., Hubele, J., Imme, G., Iori, I., Kreutz, P., Kunde, G.J., Leray, S., Lindenstruth, V., Liu, Z., Lynen, U., Meijer, R.J., Milkau, U., Müller, W.F.J., NgÔ, C., Pochodzalla, J., Raciti, G., Rudolf, G., Sann, H., Schüttauf, A., Seidel, W., Stuttge, L., Trautmann, W., Tucholski, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1214 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaufman, S.B., Steinberg, E.P.: Phys. Rev. C 22, 167 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ray, E.L., Korteling, G.G., Korteling, G.R.: Phys. Rev. C 22, 1594 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Müller
    • 1
  • K. Sistemich
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Kern- und Hadronenphysik, Forschungszentrum RossendorfDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik II/KFA JülichJülichGermany

Personalised recommendations