The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 105–108 | Cite as

Staging interurban highway construction by dynamic programming: Reply

  • M. John Hodgson
Communications
  • 24 Downloads

Keywords

Dynamic Programming Environmental Economic Highway Construction Interurban Highway 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Neufville, R. and T. Mori (1970), “Optimal Highway Staging by Dynamic Programming,”ASCE Transportation Engineering Journal, 96, 11–24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Funk, M.L. and F. A. Tillman (1968), “Optimal Construction Staging by Dynamic Programming,”ASCE Journal of the Highway Division, 94, 255–265.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bergendahl(1969), “A Combined Linear and Dynamic Programming Model for Interdependent Road Investment Planning,”Transportation Research, 3, 211–228.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quant, R. E. (1960), “Models of Transportation and Optimal Network Construction,”Journal of Regional Science, 2, 27–45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barr, B. and K. Smillie (1972), “Some Spatial Interpretations of Alternative Optimal and Suboptimal Solutions to the Transportation Problem,”The Canadian Geographer, 16, 356–364.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKinnon, R. D. and M. J. Hodgson (1970), “Optimal Transportation Networks: A Case Study of Highway Systems,”Environment and Planning, 2, 267–284.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hooper, W. L. (1968), “Transportation: Burden or Blessing to the Urban Environment,”Transportation Research, 2, 177–186.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wachs, M. and T. G. Kumagai (1973), “Physical Accessibility as a Social Indicator,”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7, 437–456.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohring, H. D. and Harwitz(1962).Highway benefits: An Analytical Framework, N.W. U. Press, Evanston.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill, M. (1973),Planning for Multiple Objectives, Monograph Series, Regional Science Research Institute, 5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kapur, K. C. (1970), “Mathematical Methods of Optimization for Multiobjective Transportation Systems,”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 4, 451–467.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quant, R. E. and W. J. Baumol (1966), “The Demand for Abstract Transport Modes: Theory and Measurement,”Journal of Regional Science, 6, 13–26.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crow, R. T., K. H. Young, and T. Cooley (1973), “Alternative Demand Functions for ‘Abstract’ Transportation Modes,”Transportation Research, 7, 335–354.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gronau, R. and R. E. Acaly (1969), “The Demand for Abstract Transport Modes: Some Misgivings,”Journal of Regional Science, 9, 153–157.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodgson, M. H. (1973), “Staging Interurban Highway Construction by Dynamic Programming,”Annals of Regional Science, 8, 123–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Annals of Regional Science 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. John Hodgson
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of AlbertaUSA

Personalised recommendations