Climate Dynamics

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 35–51 | Cite as

Equilibrium and transient climatic warming induced by increased atmospheric CO2

  • M. E. Schlesinger


The change in the Earth's equilibrium global mean surface temperature induced by a doubling of the CO2 concentration has been estimated as 0.2 to 10 K by surface energy balance models, 0.5 to 4.2 K by radiative-convective models, and 1.3 to 4.2 K by general circulation models. These wide ranges are interpreted and quantified here in terms of the direct radiative, forcing of the increased CO2, the response of the climate system in the absence of feedback processes, and the feedbacks of the climate system. It is the range in the values of these feedbacks that leads to the ranges in the projections of the global mean surface warming. The time required for a CO2-induced climate change to reach equilibrium has been characterized by an e-folding time τe with values estimated by a variety of climate/ocean models as 10 to 100 years. Analytical and numerical studies show that this wide range is due to the strong dependence of τe on the equilibrium sensitivity of the climate model and on the effective vertical thermal diffusivity of the ocean model. A coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model simulation for doubled CO2 suggestes that, as a result of the transport of the CO2-induced surface heating into the interior of the ocean, τe ≅ 50 to 100 years. Theoretical studies for a realistic CO2 increase between 1850 and 1980 indicate that this sequestering of heat into the ocean's interior is responsible for the concomittant warming being only about half that which would have occurred in the absence of the ocean. These studies also indicate that the climate sytem will continue to warm towards its as yet unrealized equilibrium temperature change, even if there is no further increase in the CO2 concentration.


Thermal Diffusivity General Circulation Model Surface Energy Balance Energy Balance Model General Circulation Model Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Augustsson T, Ramanthan V (1977) A radiative-convective model study of the CO2 climate problem. J Atmos Sci 34: 448–451Google Scholar
  2. Broecker WS, Peng T-H, Engh R (1980) Modeling the carbon system. Radiocarbon 22: 565–598Google Scholar
  3. Bryan K, Komro FG, Manabe S Spelman MJ (1982) Transient climate response to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 215: 56–58Google Scholar
  4. Bryan K, Komro FG, Rooth C (1984) The ocean's transient response to global surface temperature anomalies. In: Hansen JE, Takahashi T (eds) Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Maurice Ewing Series, 5. American, Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  5. Budyko MI (1969) The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the earth. Tellus 21: 611–619Google Scholar
  6. Callendar GS (1938) The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature. Q J Meteor Soc 64: 223–240Google Scholar
  7. Charlock TP (1981) Cloud optics as a possible stabilizing factor in climate change. J Atmos Sci 38: 661–663Google Scholar
  8. Elliott WP, Machta L, Keeling CD (1985) An estimate of the biotic contribution to the atmospheric CO2 increase based on direct measurements at Mauna Loa Observatory. J Geophys Res 90: 3741–3746Google Scholar
  9. Gates WL (1976a) Modeling the ice-age climate. Science 191: 1138–1144Google Scholar
  10. Gates WL (1976b) The numerical simulation of ice-age climate with a global general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 33: 1844–1873Google Scholar
  11. Gates WL, Han Y-J, Schlesinger ME (1985) The global climate simulated by a coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model: Preliminary results. In: JCJ Nihoul (ed) Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Models. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 131–151Google Scholar
  12. Ghan SJ, Lingaas JW, Schlesinger ME, Mobley RL, Gates WL (1982) A documentation of the OSU two-level atmospheric general circulation model. Report No. 35, Climatic Research Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 395 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall MCG, Cacuci DG, Schlesinger ME (1982) Sensitivity analysis of a radiative-convective model by the adjoint method. J Atmos Sci 39: 2038–2050Google Scholar
  14. Han Y-J (1984a) A numerical world ocean general circulation model. Part I. Basic design and barotropic experiment. Dyn Atmos Oceans 8: 107–140Google Scholar
  15. Han Y-J (1984b) A numerical world ocean general circulation model. Part II. A baroclinic experiment. Dyn Atmos Oceans 8: 141–172Google Scholar
  16. Han Y-J, Schlesinger ME, Gates WL (1985) An analysis of the air-sea-ice interaction simulated by the OSU coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model. In: JCJ Nihoul (ed) Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Models. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 167–182Google Scholar
  17. Hansen J, Johnson D, Lacis A, Lebedeff S, Lee P, Rind D, Russell G (1981) Climate impact of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 213: 957–966Google Scholar
  18. Hansen J, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I, Ruedy R, Lerner J (1984) Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms. In: Hansen JE, Takahashi T (eds) Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity. Maurice Ewing Series, 5, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 130–163Google Scholar
  19. Harvey LDD (1986) Effect of ocean mixing on the transient climate response to a CO2 increase: analysis of recent model results. J Geophys Res 91: 2709–2718Google Scholar
  20. Hoffert MI, Callegari AJ, Hsieh C-T (1980) The role of deep sea heat storage in the secular response to climate forcing. J Geophys Res 85: 6667–6679Google Scholar
  21. Hummel JR (1982) Surface temperature sensitivities in a multiple cloud radiative-convective model with a constant and pressure dependent lapse rate. Tellus 34: 203–208Google Scholar
  22. Hummel JR, Kuhn WR (1981a) Comparison of radiative-convective models with constant and pressure-dependent lapse rates. Tellus 33: 254–261Google Scholar
  23. Hummel JR, Kuhn WR (1981b) An atmospheric radiative-convective model with interactive water vapor transport and cloud development. Tellus 33: 372–381Google Scholar
  24. Hummel JR, Reck RA (1981) Carbon dioxide and climate: The effects of water transport in radiative-convective models. J Geophys Res 86: 12035–12038Google Scholar
  25. Hunt BG (1981) An examination of some feedback mechanisms in the carbon dioxide climate problem. Tellus 33: 78–88Google Scholar
  26. Hunt BG, Wells NC (1979) An assessment of the possible future climate impact of carbon dioxide increases based on a coupled one-dimensional atmospheric-oceanic model. J Geophys Res 84: 787–791Google Scholar
  27. Imbrie J, Imbrie KP (1979) Ice Ages, Solving the Mystery. Enslow Publishers, Short Hills, NJ, 224 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones PD, Wigley TML, Wright PB (1986) Global temperature variations. 1861–1984. Nature (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Keeling CE, Bacastow RB, Whorf TP (1982) Measurements of the concentration of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. In: Clark WC (ed) Carbon Dioxide Review: 1982, Oxford University Press, pp 377–385Google Scholar
  30. Lal M, Ramanathan V (1984) The effects of moist convection and water vapor radiative processes on climate sensitivity. J Atmos Sci 41: 2238–2249Google Scholar
  31. Lindzen RS, Hou AY, Farrell BF (1982) The role of convective model choice in calculating the climate impact of doubling CO2. J Atmos Sci 39: 1189–1205Google Scholar
  32. Luther FM (1984) The Intercomparison of Radiation Codes in Climatic Models (ICRCCM): Longwave Clear-Sky Calculations. World Climate Research Programme, WCP-93, International Council of Scientific Unions and World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, 37 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Manabe S (1971) Estimate of future changes in climate due to increase of carbon dioxide concentration in the air. Man's Impact on Climate. In: Mathews WH, Kellogg WW, Robinson GD (eds) The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 249–264Google Scholar
  34. Manabe S, Wetherald RT (1967) Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J Atmos Sci 24: 241–259Google Scholar
  35. Manabe S, Wetherald RT (1975) The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration of the climate of a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 32: 3–15Google Scholar
  36. Manabe S, Wetherald RT (1980) On the distribution of climate change resulting from an increase in CO2-content of the atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 37: 99–118Google Scholar
  37. McClatchey RA, Fenn RW, Selby JEA, Volz FE, Garing JS (1971) Optical properties of the atmosphere. AFCRL-71-0279, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Bedford, MA, 85 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Möller F (1963) On the influence of changes in CO2 concentration in air on the radiative balance of the earth's surface and on the climate. J Geophys Res 68: 3877–3886Google Scholar
  39. Newell RE, Dopplick TG (1979) Questions concerning the possible influence of anthropogenic CO2 on atmospheric temperature. J Appl Meteor 18: 822–825Google Scholar
  40. Nordhaus WD, Yohe GW (1983) Future paths of energy and carbon dioxide emissions. Changing Climate, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, pp 87–153Google Scholar
  41. Ramanathan V, Lian MS, Cess RD (1979) Increased atmospheric CO2: Zonal and seasonal estimates of the effects on the radiation energy balance and surface temperature. Geophys Res 84: 4949–4958Google Scholar
  42. Rasool SI, Schneider SH (1971) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and aerosols: Effects of large increases on global climate. Science 173: 138–141Google Scholar
  43. Rotty RM (1983) Distribution of and changes in industrial carbon dioxide production. J Geophys Res 88: 1301–1308Google Scholar
  44. Rowntree PR, Walker J (1978) The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on radiative-convective equilibrium. In: Williams J (ed) Carbon Dioxide, Climate and Society. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 181–191Google Scholar
  45. Schlesinger ME (1983) A review of climate model simulations of CO2-induced climatic change. Report No. 41. Climatic Research Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 135 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlesinger ME (1984) Climate model simulations of CO2-induced climatic change. In: Saltzman B (ed) Advances in Geophysics 26, Academic Press, New York, pp 141–235Google Scholar
  47. Schlesinger ME (1985) Feedback analysis of results from energy balance and radiative-convective models. In: MacCracken MC, Luther FJ (eds) Projecting the Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide, DOE/ER-0237 US Department of Energy, Washington DC, pp 280–319Google Scholar
  48. Schlesinger ME, Gates WL (1980) The January and July performance of the OSU two-level atmospheric general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 37: 1914–1943Google Scholar
  49. Schlesinger ME, Gates WL (1981) Preliminary analysis of the mean annual, cycle and interannual variability simulated by the OSU two-level atmospheric general circulation model. Report No. 23, Climatic Research Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 47 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Schlesinger ME, Gates WL, Han Y-J (1985) The role of the ocean in CO2-induced climate warming: Preliminary results from the OSU coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM. In: Nihoul JCJ (ed) Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Models. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 447–478Google Scholar
  51. Schlesinger ME, Mitchell JFB (1985) Model projections of equilibrium climate response to increased CO2. In: MacCracken MC, Luther FM (eds) Projecting the Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide, DOE/ER-0237 US Department of Energy, Washington DC, pp 81–147Google Scholar
  52. Schneider SH, Thompson SL (1981) Atmospheric CO2 and climate: Importance of the transient response. J Geophys Res 86: 3135–3147Google Scholar
  53. Sellers WD (1969) A global climate model based on the energy balance of the earth-atmosphere system. J Appl Meteor 8: 392–400Google Scholar
  54. Siegenthaler U (1983) Uptake of excess CO2 by an outcrop-diffusion model of the ocean. J Geophys Res 88: 3599–3608Google Scholar
  55. Siegenthaler U, Oeschger H (1984) Transient temperature changes due to increasing CO2 using simple models. Ann Glaciol 5: 153–159Google Scholar
  56. Sommerville RCJ, Remer LA (1984) Cloud optical thickness feedbacks in the CO2 climate problem. J Geophys Res 89: 9668–9672Google Scholar
  57. Spelman MJ, Manabe S (1984) Influence of oceanic heat transport upon the sensitivity of a model climate. J Geophys Res 89: 571–586Google Scholar
  58. Stephens GL, Ackerman S, Smith EA (1984) A shortwave parameterization revised to improve cloud absorption. J Atmos Sci 41: 687–690Google Scholar
  59. Wang W-C, Stone PH (1980) Effect of ice-albedo on global sensitivity in a one-dimensional radiative-convective climate model. J Atmos Sci 37: 545–552Google Scholar
  60. Wang W-C, Rossow WB, Yao M-S, Wolfson M (1981) Climate sensitivity of a one-dimensional radiative-convective model with cloud feedback. J Atmos Sci 38: 1167–1178Google Scholar
  61. Washington WM, Meehl GA (1983) General circulation model experiments on the climatic effects due to a doubling and quadrupling of carbon dioxide concentration. J Geophys Res 88: 6600–6610Google Scholar
  62. Washington WM, Meehl GA (1984) Seasonal cycle experiment on the climate sensitivity due to a doubling of CO2 with an atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a simple mixed-layer ocean model. J Geophys Res 89: 9475–9503Google Scholar
  63. Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1986) An investigation of cloud cover change in response to thermal forcing. Climatic Change 8: 5–23Google Scholar
  64. Wigley TML, Schlesinger ME (1985) Analytical solution for the effect of increasing CO2 on global mean temperature. Nature 315: 649–652Google Scholar
  65. World Meteorological Organization (1983). Report of the WMO (CAS) Meeting of Experts on the CO2 Concentrations from Pre-Industrial Times to IGY. World Climate Programme, WCP-53, WMO/ICSU, Geneva, 34 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Schlesinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric Sciences and Climatic Research InstituteOregon State University CorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations