Protoplasma

, Volume 135, Issue 2–3, pp 80–87 | Cite as

Estimating viability of plant protoplasts using double and single staining

  • C. -N. Huang
  • M. J. Cornejo
  • D. S. Bush
  • R. L. Jones
Article

Summary

The utility of numerous dyes for determining the viability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Himalaya) aleurone protoplasts was studied. Protoplasts isolated from the barley aleurone layer synthesize and secrete α-amylase isozymes in response to treatment with gibberellic acid (GA) and Ca2+. These cells also undergo dramatic morphological changes which eventually result in cell death. To monitor the viability of protoplasts during incubation in GA and Ca2+, several types of fluorescent and nonfluorescent dyes were tested. Evans blue and methylene blue were selected as nonfluorescent dyes. Living cells exclude Evans blue, but dead cells and cell debris stain blue. Both living and dead cells take up methylene blue, but living cells reduce the dye to its colorless form whereas dead cells and cell debris stain blue. The relatively low extinction coefficient of these dyes sometimes makes it difficult to distinguish blue-stained cells against a background of blue dye. Several types of fluorescent dyes were tested for their ability to differentially stain dead or living cells. Tinopal CBS-X, for example, stains only dead cells, and its high extinction coefficient allows its ultraviolet fluorescence to be recorded even when preparations are simultaneously illuminated with visible light. To double-stain protoplasts, the most effective stain was a combination of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and propidium iodide (PI). By employing a double-exposure method to record the fluorescence from cells stained with both FDA and PI, dead and living cells could be distinguished on the basis of fluorochromasia.

Keywords

Barley aleurone Fluorescein diacetate Propidium iodide Protoplasts Viability determination Vital stains 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bush DS,Cornejo MJ,Huang CN,Jones RL (1986) Ca2+ stimulated amylase secretion from barley aleurone protoplasts. Plant Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Carbonell J, Jones RL (1984) A comparison of the effects of Ca2+ and gibberellic acid on enzyme synthesis and secretion in barley aleurone. Physiol Plant 63: 345–350Google Scholar
  3. Conn HJ (1961) Biological stains. A handbook on the nature and uses of the dyes employed in the biological laboratory, 7th edn. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  4. Crippen RW, Perrier JL (1974) The use of neutral red and Evans blue for live-dead determinations of marine plankton. Stain Technol 49: 97–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Denenberg, VH (1976) Statistics and experimental design for behavioral and biological researchers. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans DA, Bravo JE (1983) Protoplast isolation and culture. In:Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV, Yamada Y (eds) Handbook of plant cell culture, vol 1. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaff DF, Okong'O-Ogola O (1971) The use of non-permeating pigments for testing the survival of cells. J Exp Bot 22: 756–758Google Scholar
  8. Galbraith DW (1981) Microfluorometric quantitation of cellulose biosynthesis by plant protoplasts using Calcofluor White. Physiol Plant 53: 111–116Google Scholar
  9. Glimelius K, Wallin A, Eriksson T (1974) Agglutinating effects of concanavalin A on isolated protoplasts ofDaucus carota. Physiol Plant 31: 225–230Google Scholar
  10. Gurr E (1971) Synthetic dyes in biology, medicine, and chemistry. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Tech 45: 115–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hooley R, McCarthy D (1980) Extracts from virus infected hypersensitive tobacco leaves are detrimental to protoplast survival. Physiol Plant Pathol 16: 25–38Google Scholar
  13. Hudson L, Hay FC (1980) Practical immunology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobsen JV, Zwar JA, Chandler PM (1985) Gibberellic-acid-responsive protoplasts from mature aleurone of Himalaya barley. Planta 163: 430–438Google Scholar
  15. Jones KH, Senft JA (1985) An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetate-propidium iodide. J Histochem Cytochem 33: 77–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones RL, Varner JE (1967) The bioassay of gibberellins. Planta 72: 155–161Google Scholar
  17. Larkin PJ (1976) Purification and viability of plant protoplasts. Planta 128: 213–216Google Scholar
  18. McCann J, Yamasaki E, Ames BN (1975) Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 5135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagata T, Takebe I (1970) Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Planta 92: 301–308Google Scholar
  20. Parks DR, Bryan VM, Or VT, Herzenberg LA (1979) Antigen-specific identification and cloning of hybridomas with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 1962–1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Peterson CA, Edgington LV (1976) Uptake of the systemic fungicide methyl 2-benzimidazolecarbamate and the fluorescent dye PTS by onion roots. Phytopathology 65: 1254–1259Google Scholar
  22. —,Emanuel ME, Humphreys GB (1981) Pathway of movement of apoplastic fluorescent dye tracers through the endodermis at the site of secondary root formation in corn (Zea mays) and broad bean (Vicia faba). Can J Bot 59: 618–625Google Scholar
  23. Rotman B, Papermaster BW (1966) Membrane properties of living mammalian cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 55: 134–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. SAS Institute (1982) SAS users guide: statistics, 1982 edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  25. Strugger S (1939) Studien über den Transpirationsstrom im Blatt vonSecale cereale undTriticum vulgare. Z Bot 35: 97–113Google Scholar
  26. Widholm JM (1972) The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Tech 47: 184–194Google Scholar
  27. Windholz M, Budavari S, Stroumtsos LY, Fertig MN (eds) (1976) The Merck Index, an encyclopedia of chemicals and drugs. 9th edn. Merck, RahwayGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. -N. Huang
    • 1
  • M. J. Cornejo
    • 1
  • D. S. Bush
    • 1
  • R. L. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations