Protoplasma

, Volume 107, Issue 1–2, pp 127–147 | Cite as

The ultrastructure of septal pores and associated structures in the ascogenous hyphae and asci ofSordaria humana

  • A. Beckett
Article

Summary

Septal pores and associated structures have been studied in ascogenous hyphae, croziers and asci ofSordaria humana by means of electron microscopy of serial and random sections. Pores exhibit variable structures from relatively simple pore caps to complex swollen rims with associated membrane cisternae. The simple types are found at the base of the ascogenous hyphae while the complex forms occur at the apex, in the croziers and in very young, presporulation asci. Post-sporulation asci contain a relatively simple type of pore structure. Cells which subtend the ascogenous hyphae exhibit both open and capped pores in their cross walls. Pore structures may be asymmetric in which case they show greater complexity on the side of the cross wall nearest to the apex or crozier. Membranous components of the complex pores are continuous with the endomembrane systems of the two adjacent cells and thus with the outer membranes of the nuclear envelopes. Membrane continuities may connect prefusion nuclei or fusion nuclei in penultimate cells, with nuclei of the stalk and terminal cells of croziers. Some speculation is presented as to the implication and possible roles of these structures in relation to cell differentiation within the ascogenous hyphae and croziers.

Keywords

Asci Ascomycetes Ascogenous hyphae Croziers Intercellular communication Septal pores Sordaria humana 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckett, A., 1981: The ultrastructure and behaviour of nuclei and associated structures within the meiotic cells of Euascomycetes. In: The fungal nucleus: structure, biochemistry and genetics (Gull, K., Oliver, S. G., eds.). (In Press.) London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. —,Heath, I. B., McLaughlin, D. J., 1974: An atlas of fungal ultrastructure, 221 p. London-New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, W. R., Therrien, C. D., 1977: A cytophotometric investigation of the relationship of DNA and RNA synthesis to ascus development inSordaria fimicola. Can. J. genet. Cytol.19, 359–370.Google Scholar
  4. Bracker, C. E., 1967: Ultrastructure of fungi. Ann. Rev. Phytopath.5, 343–374.Google Scholar
  5. Cabib, E., 1975: Molecular aspects of yeast morphogenesis. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.29, 191–214.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, G., 1967: The fine structure of the ascus septum inAscodesmis sphaerospora andSaccobolus kerverni. Mycologia59, 527–532.Google Scholar
  7. Chadefaud, M., 1953: Sur unHypocopra, sa position systématique, ses spores et ses asques. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris236, 513–514.Google Scholar
  8. Craig, A. S., 1974: Sodium borohydride as an aldehyde blocking reagent for electron microscope histochemistry. Histochem.42, 141–144.Google Scholar
  9. Craig, G. D., Newsam, R. J., Gull, K., 1977: Subhymenial branching and dolipore septation inAgaricus bisporus. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.69, 337–344.Google Scholar
  10. Flegler, S. L., Hooper, G. R., Fields, W. G., 1976: Ultrastructural and cytochemical changes in the basidiomycete dolipore septum associated with fruiting. Can. J. Bot.54, 2243–2253.Google Scholar
  11. Furtado, J. S., 1971: The septal pore and other ultrastructural features of the pyrenomyceteSordaria fimicola. Mycologia63, 104–113.Google Scholar
  12. Giesy, R. M., Day, P. R., 1965: The septal pores ofCoprinus lagopus in relation to nuclear migration. Amer. J. Bot.52, 287–293.Google Scholar
  13. Gull, K., 1976: Differentiation of septal ultrastructure according to cell type in the basidiomycete,Agrocybe praecox. J. Ultrastruct. Res.54, 89–94.Google Scholar
  14. —, 1978: Form and function of septa in filamentous fungi. In: The filamentous fungi. III. Developmental mycology (Smith, J. E., Berry, D. R., eds.), pp. 78–93. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, N., 1978: Nuclear pore distribution and relation to adjacent cytoplasmic organelles in cotyledon cells of developingVicia faba. Planta141, 121–128.Google Scholar
  16. Hotta, Y., Stern, H., 1971: Analysis of DNA synthesis during meiotic prophase inLilium. J. mol. Biol.55, 337–355.Google Scholar
  17. Hunsley, D., Gooday, G. W., 1974: The structure and development of septa inNeurospora crassa. Protoplasma82, 125–146.Google Scholar
  18. Jersild, R., Mishkin, S., Niederpruem, D. J., 1967: Origin and ultrastructure of complex septa inSchizophyllum commune development. Arch. Mikrobiol.57, 20–32.Google Scholar
  19. Karnovsky, M. J., 1965: A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.27, 137 A-138 A.Google Scholar
  20. Koltin, Y., Flexer, A. S., 1969: Alteration of nuclear distribution in B-mutant strains ofSchizophyllum commune. J. Cell Sci.4, 739–749.Google Scholar
  21. Lamb, B. C., 1966: Polarized segregation in Ascomycetes and the differential bursting of asci. Genet. Res., Camb.7, 325–334.Google Scholar
  22. Marchant, R., Wessels, J. G. H., 1974: An ultrastructural study of septal dissolution inSchizophyllum commune. Arch. Mikrobiol.96, 175–182.Google Scholar
  23. Marinozzi, V., 1961: Silver impregnation methods of ultrathin sections for electron microscopy. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.9, 121–133.Google Scholar
  24. Marty, M. F., 1973: Sites réactifs à l'iodure de zinc-tetroxide d'osmium dans les cellules de la racined'Euphorbia characius. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris277, D1317–1320.Google Scholar
  25. Mayfield, J. E., 1974: Septal involvement in nuclear migration inSchizophyllum commune. Arch. Microbiol.95, 115–124.Google Scholar
  26. Niederpruem, D. J., Wessels, J. G. H., 1969: Cytodifferentiation and morphogenesis inSchizophyllum commune. Bacteriol. Rev.33, 505–535.Google Scholar
  27. Pépin, R., 1971: Sur les ultrastructures aux pores septaux dans l'apothécie deGalactinia cerea. (Sow. ex Mérat) Le Gal, champignon Discomycète. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris272, 3126–3128.Google Scholar
  28. Raudaskoski, M., 1972: Secondary mutations at the Bβ incompatibility locus and nuclear migration in the basidiomyceteSchizophyllum commune. Hereditas72, 175–182.Google Scholar
  29. —, 1973: Light and electron microscope study of unilateral mating between a secondary mutant and a wild-type strain ofSchizophyllum commune. Protoplasma76, 35–48.Google Scholar
  30. Read, N. D., 1981: A study of perithecium development inSordaria humana (Fuckel) Winter. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Botany, Bristol University.Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, E. S., 1963: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.17, 208–212.Google Scholar
  32. Roland, J. C., 1969: Mise en évidence sur coupes ultrafines de formations polysaccharidiques directement associées au plasmalemme. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris269 D, 939–942.Google Scholar
  33. Shoemaker, R. A., 1955: Biology, cytology and taxonomy ofCochliobolus sativus. Can. J. Bot.33, 562–576.Google Scholar
  34. Spurr, A. R., 1969: A low viscosity epoxy embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res.26, 31–43.Google Scholar
  35. Syrop, M. J., Beckett, A., 1972: The origin of ascospore-delimiting membranes inTaphrina deformans. Arch. Mikrobiol.86, 185–191.Google Scholar
  36. Uecker, F. A., 1976: Development and cytology ofSordaria humana. Mycologia68, 30–46.Google Scholar
  37. van der Valk, P., Marchant, R., Wessels, J. G. H., 1977: Ultrastructural localization of polysaccharides in the wall and septum of the basidiomyceteSchizophyllum commune. Exp. Mycol.1, 69–82.Google Scholar
  38. Wells, K., 1972: Light and electron microscopic studies ofAscobolus stercorarius II. Ascus and ascospore ontogeny. University of California Publications in Botany62, 1–93.Google Scholar
  39. —, 1978: The fine structure of septal pore apparatus in the lamellae ofPholiota terrestris. Can. J. Bot.56, 2915–2924.Google Scholar
  40. Wessels, J. G. H., Kreger, D. R., Marchant, R., Regensburg, B. A., de Vries, O. M. H., 1972: Chemical and morphological characterization of the hyphal wall surface of the basidiomyceteSchizophyllum commune. Biochim. biophys. Acta273, 346–358.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Beckett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyBristol UniversityBristolUK

Personalised recommendations