World Journal of Urology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 32–35 | Cite as

Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase in human cavernous smooth muscle

  • A. Taher
  • M. Meyer
  • C. G. Stief
  • U. Jonas
  • W. G. Forssmann
Article

Summary

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) are important second messengers in mediating relaxation of various smooth-muscle cells. This second-messenger pathway also appears to be essential for cavernous smooth-muscle relaxation on the basis of the assumption it would be of theoretical and clinical interest to determine the functional relevance of various phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoenzymes in human cavernous smooth-muscle. This study was concentrated on characterizing PDE isoenzymes that exist in cavernous smooth muscle and evaluating the effect of selective PDE inhibitors on relaxation that is needed for the initiation of erection. Separation of PDE isoenzymes was performed using anion-exchange chromatography [diethylaminoethanol (DEAE)-Sepharose column], and a modification of the PDE-assay method proposed by Thompson and Lakey was used. The relaxation effect of PDE inhibitors was evaluated in an organ-bath study. Three different PDE isoenzymes have been shown in human cavernous smooth-muscle homogenate: cGMP-inhibited PDE (PDE III), cAMP-specific PDE (PDE IV), and cGMP-specific PDE (PDE V). All PDE inhibitors tested showed a relaxation effect on isolated human cavernous smooth-muscle, albeit with differing potency. Quazinone (a selective PDE III inhibitor) had potency at least equal to that of papaverine (a non-selective PDE inhibitor) and had a superior effect as compared with Rolipram (a selective PDE IV inhibitor) and zaprinast (a selective PDE V inhibitor). The present study provides the rationale and opens the possibility of using selective PDE inhibitors in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction.

Keywords

Erectile Dysfunction Papaverine Rolipram Guanosine Monophosphate Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adaikan PG (1992) Comment on the mechanism for the regulation of penile smooth muscle contractility. In: Lue TF (ed) World book of impotence. Stockton Press, Houndmills, pp 52–56Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahn HS, Crim W, Romano M, Sybertz E, Pitts B (1989) Effects of selective inhibitors on cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases of rabbit aorta. Biochem Pharmacol 38: 3331–3339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beavo JA (1988) Multiple isoenzymes of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase. Adv Second Messengers Phosphoprotein Res 22: 1–38Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beavo JA, Reifsnyder DH (1990) Primary sequence of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzymes and the design of selective inhibitors. TIPS 11: 150–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christ GJ, Valvic M, Maayani S, Melman A (1989) Kinetic studies of contraction in human erectile tissue (HET) and rabbit aortic rings in vitro: modulation by papaverine and the dihydropyridine analog nifedipine. Int J Impotence Res 1: 1–10Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Tejada IS (1992) Mechanism for the regulation of penile smooth muscle contractility. In: Lue TF (ed) World book of impotence. Stockton Press, Houndmills, pp 39–48Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrari M (1973) Effects of papaverine on smooth muscle and their mechanisms. Pharmacol Res Commun 6: 97–114Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leroy MJ, Cedrin I, Giovagrandi Y, Ferre F (1989) Correlation between selective inhibition of the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases and the contractile activity in human pregnant myometrium near term. Biochem Pharmacol 1: 9–15Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nicholson CD, Challiss J, Shahid M (1991) Differential modulation of tissue function and therapeutic potential of selective inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzymes. TIPS 12: 19–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pöch G, Kukovetz WR (1971) Papaverine-induced inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity in various mammalian tissue. Life Sci 10: 133–144Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rall TW (1982) Fomation and degradation of cyclic nucleotides: an overview. In: Nathanson JA, Kebabian CN (eds) Handbook of pharmacology. Willey, Sussex, p 3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reeves ML, Leigh BK, England PJ (1987) The identification of a new cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity in human and guinea-pig cardiac ventricle. Implications for the mechanism of action of selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Biochem J 241: 535–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silver PJ, Hamel LT, Perrone MH Bentley RG, Bushover CR, Evans DB (1988) Differential pharmacologic sensitivity of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzymes isolated from cardiac muscle, arterial and airway smooth muscle. Eur J Pharmacol 150: 85–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson WJ, Brooker G, Appleman MM (1971) Assay of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases with radioactive substrates. Biochemistry 10: 311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torphy TJ, Cieslinski LB (1989) Characterization and selective inhibition of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoenzymes in canine tracheal smooth muscle. Mol Pharmacol 37: 206–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Taher
    • 1
  • M. Meyer
    • 2
  • C. G. Stief
    • 1
  • U. Jonas
    • 1
  • W. G. Forssmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologyHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Peptide ResearchHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations