Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 311–333 | Cite as

An inclusive pedagogy in mathematics education

  • Claudie Solar
Article

Abstract

In this article, the author discusses characteristics in feminist pedagogy literature and situates them with respect to four dialectical aspects. These characteristics are then combined with non-discriminatory classroom practices to develop a frame of reference for an inclusive pedagogy in mathematics education.

Keywords

Mathematics Education Classroom Practice Pedagogy Literature Feminist Pedagogy Inclusive Pedagogy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Council on Education: 1987,Minorities in Higher Education, Washington DC, Third Annual Status Report.Google Scholar
  2. Arnot M.: 1985,Race and Gender. Equal Opportunities Policies in Education, Pergamon Press with the Open University, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes M.: 1994, ‘Investigating Change: A gender-inclusive course in calculus’,Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 25(2), 49–56.Google Scholar
  4. Barrette M. and L. Lafortune: 1994, ‘La dentelle mathématique’, in Solar C. and L. Lafortune (eds),Des mathématiques autrement, Remue-ménage, Montreal.Google Scholar
  5. Baudelot C. and R. Establet: 1992,Allez les filles!, Editions du Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Belenky M. F., B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger and J. M. Tarule: 1986,Women's Ways of Knowing, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Belotti E. G.: 1974,Du côté des petites filles, Editions des femmes, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Bertrand Y.: 1979,Les modèles éducationnels, Service pédagogique, Université de Montréal, Montréal.Google Scholar
  9. Best F.: 1988, ‘Les avatars du mot ‘pédagogie’’,Perspectives 18(2), 161–170.Google Scholar
  10. Bezucha R.: 1985, ‘Feminist pedagogy as a subversive activity’, in M. Culley and C. Portuges,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
  11. Bolli M.: 1985, ‘Femmes et savoir: mouvement d'approche’,Femmes et formation, Université de Genève. Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l'éducation, (Pratiques et théorie, cahier No 38), pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
  12. Bouchard P.: 1989,Pour ne plus mourir de rire: études des plaisanteries sexistes, Ottawa, Perspectives féministes no 18. Institut canadien de recherche sur les femmes.Google Scholar
  13. Briskin L.: 1990,Feminist Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning Liberation, Ottawa, Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women/Institut canadien de recherche sur les femmes. Feminist Perspectives Féministes. No 19.Google Scholar
  14. Briskin L. and R. Coulter: 1992, ‘Feminist pedagogy: Challenging the normative’,Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation,17(3), 247–263.Google Scholar
  15. Bunch C. and S. Pollack: 1983,Learning Our Way: Essays in Feminist Education, The Crossing Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Butler J.: 1984, ‘Black studies/women's studies: points of convergence’, in K. Loring,Feminist Pedagogy and the Learning climate. Proceedings of the 9th Annual GLCA Women's Studies Association, Ann Arbor, Great Lakes Colleges Association, Women's Studies Program, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
  17. Butler J.: 1985, ‘Toward a Pedagogy of Everywoman's Studies’, in M. Culley and C. Portuges,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 230–239.Google Scholar
  18. Chapman A.: 1988,The Difference It Makes: A Resource Book on Gender for Educators, Boston, National Association of Independent Schools.Google Scholar
  19. Collins J.: 1988, ‘Language and Class in Minority Education’,Anthropology and Education Quarterly 19(4), 299–326.Google Scholar
  20. Cruikshank M.: 1982,Lesbian Studies Present and Future, The Feminist Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Crumpacker L. and E. M. Vander Haegen: 1987, ‘Pedagogy and Prejudice: Strategies for Confronting Homophobia in the Classroom’,Women's Studies Quarterly 15(3&4), 65–73.Google Scholar
  22. Culley M. and C. Portuges: 1985,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Dagg A. and P. Thompson: 1988,MisEducation: Women and Canadian Universities, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
  24. Damarin S.: 1990, ‘Teaching mathematics: A feminist perspective’, in L. A. Steen, ed,Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990's, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 1990 Yearbook, pp. 144–151.Google Scholar
  25. Davis F. and A. Steiger: 1993.Feminist Pedagogy in the Physical Sciences. Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Science, Québec.Google Scholar
  26. Davis F., A. Steiger and K. Tennenhouse: 1989,A Practical Assessment of Feminist Pedagogy, Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Science. Direction générale de l'enseignement collégial, Qu ébec.Google Scholar
  27. Delamont S.: 1980,Sex Role and the School, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  28. Descarries-Bélanger F. and S. Roy: 1988,Le mouvement des femmes et ses courants de pensée: essai de typologie, Les documents de l'ICREF, No 19, Ottawa, Institut canadien de recherche sur les femmes/Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.Google Scholar
  29. Dunn K.: 1987, ‘Feminist teaching: Who are your students?’,Women's Studies Quarterly 15(3&4), 40–46.Google Scholar
  30. Edwards K. L.: 1984, ‘Seeking feminist transformation of the sciences and the teaching of science’ in K. Loring,Feminist Pedagogy and the Learning Climate. Proceedings of the 9th Annual GLCA Women's Studies Association, Ann Arbor, Great Lakes Colleges Association. Women's Studies Program.Google Scholar
  31. Epstein C. F.: 1988, ‘Symbolic segregation: Gender. differences in everyday behavior, communication, and social customs’, in C. F. Epstein,Deceptive Distinctions. Sex, Gender, and the Social Order, Yale University Press/Russell Sage Foundation, New Haven and London/New York, Ch. 10, pp. 215–231.Google Scholar
  32. Fennema E.: 1990, ‘Justice, Equity, and Mathematics Education’, in E. Fennema and G. Leder, eds,Mathematics and Gender, New York and London, Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  33. Fennema E. and G. Leder, eds: 1990,Mathemathics and Gender, New York and London, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  34. Fennema E. and P. L. Petersen: 1985, ‘Autonomous Learning Behavior: A Possible Explanation of Gender-Related Differences in Mathematics’, in Wilkinson L.C. and C. B. Marrett, eds,Gender-Related Differences in Classroom Interactions, New York, Academic Press, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
  35. Fennema E., P. Peterson, T. P. Carpenter and C. A. Lubinski: 1990, ‘Teachers' Attributions and Beliefs about Girls, Boys, and Mathematics’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 21, 55–69.Google Scholar
  36. Freire P.: 1974,Pédagogie des opprimés, Maspéro, Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Ghail Mairtin M.: 1988,Young, Gifted and Black: Student-Teacher Relations in the Schooling of Black Youth, Milton Keynes, Philadelphia, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gilligan C.: 1982,In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge, London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hall R. and B. Sandier: 1982,The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?, Association of American Colleges, Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  40. Hanna G.: 1989, ‘Mathematics achievements of girls and boys in grade 8: Results from twenty countries’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 20, 225–232.Google Scholar
  41. Harbeck K. M., ed: 1992,Coming Out of the Classroom Closet: Gay and Lesbian Students, Teachers and Curriculum, Harrington Park Press, Binghampton, NY.Google Scholar
  42. Hidalgo N. M., C. L. McDowell and E. V. Siddle: 1990,Facing Racism in Education, Reprint Series No 21, Harvard Educational Review.Google Scholar
  43. Hofstede G.: 1986, ‘Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning’,Internattonal Journal of Intercultural Relations 10, 301–320.Google Scholar
  44. Holmes J. and E. L. Silverman: 1992,J'ai des choses à dire... Écoutez-moi!, Ottawa, Conseil consultatif canadien de la situation de la femme (also available in English).Google Scholar
  45. Hughes N., Y. Johnston and Y. Perreault: 1984,Stepping Out of Line. A Workbook on Lesbianism and Feminism, Press Gang Publishers, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  46. IAEP — International Assessment of Educational Progress: 1992,Evalution internationale du rendement scolaire en mathématique et en sciences chez les élèves de 9 ans et de 13 ans. Mars 1991. Rapport préliminaire.Google Scholar
  47. Jeffcoate R.: 1984,Ethnic Minorities and Education, Harper and Row, London.Google Scholar
  48. Keyssar H.: 1985, ‘Staging the Feminist Classroom: a Theoritical Model’, in M. Culley and C. Portuges,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 108–124.Google Scholar
  49. Lafortune L.: 1989,Quelles différences? Les femmes et l'enseignement des mathématiques, Montréal, Remue-ménage.Google Scholar
  50. Lafortune L. and H. Kayler, en collaboration avec M. Barrette, R. Caron, L. Paquin and Solar C.: 1992,Les femmes font des maths, Montréal, Remue-m énage.Google Scholar
  51. Leder G. C.: 1992, ‘Mathematics and Gender: Changing Perspectives’, in Grouws D., ed,Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York, Macmillan, pp. 597–622.Google Scholar
  52. Leder G. C.: 1990a, ‘Gender Differences in Mathematics: An Overview’, in E. Fennema and G. Leder, eds,Mathematics and Gender, New York and London, Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 10–26.Google Scholar
  53. Leder G. C.: 1990b, ‘Teacher/Student Interactions in the Mathematics Classroom: A Different Perspective’, in E. Fennema and G. Leder, eds,Mathematics and Gender, New York and London, Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 149–168.Google Scholar
  54. Lee L.: 1986, ‘Des épouvantails qui effraient les femmes. Les mythes en science’, in L. Goulet and L. Kurtzman, eds,L'école des femmes, Montréal, Groupe interdisciplinaire pour l'enseignement et la recherche féministes, Université du Québec à Montréal, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
  55. Lemoyne G.: 1989, ‘Les enjeux intellectuels de l'apprentissage des math ématiques’, in L. Lafortune, ed,Quelles différences?, Montréal, Remue-ménage, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
  56. Litner B., A. Rossiter and M. Taylor: 1992, The equitable inclusion of women: Some consequences for teaching’,Canadian Journal of Education 17(3), 286–302.Google Scholar
  57. Lordre A. 1984,Sister Outsider, Trumansberg, The Crossing Press, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Loring K., ed: 1984,Feminist Pedagogy and the Learning Climate, Proceedings of the 9th Annual GLCA Women's Studies Association, Ann Arbor, Great Lakes Colleges Association, Women's Studies Program.Google Scholar
  59. Luz Reyes M. and J. J. Halcon: 1988, ‘Racism in Academia: The old wolf revisited’,Harvard Educational Review 58(3): 299–314.Google Scholar
  60. Maggio R.: 1991,The Dictionary of Bias-Free Usage: A Guide to Nondiscriminatory Language, The Oryx Press, Phoenix.Google Scholar
  61. Maher F. A.: 1987, ‘Toward a Richer theory of feminist pedagogy: A comparison of ‘Liberation’ and ‘Gender’ models for teaching and learning’,Journal of Education 169(3), 91–100.Google Scholar
  62. Mayo C. and N. Henly, eds: 1981,Gender and Nonverbal Behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Mosconi N.: 1989, ‘Spécificité du rapport au savoir des femmes’, in J. Beillerot, A. Bouillet, C. Blanchard-Laville and N. Mosconi, eds,Savoir et rapport au savoir, Bégédis, Editions universitaires, pp. 85–111.Google Scholar
  64. Moses Y. T.: 1989,Black Women in Academe, Issues and Strategies, Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  65. Mura R.: 1990,Profession: Mathématicienne. Etude comparative des professeur-e-s en sciences mathématiques, Cahiers de recherche du GREMF, Groupe de recherche multidisciplinaire féministe. Université Laval, Cahier 36, Québec.Google Scholar
  66. Mura R.: 1986, ‘Regards féministes sur la mathématique’,Resources for Feminist Research/Documentation sur la recherche féministe 15 (3), 59–61.Google Scholar
  67. Mura R., R. Cloutier and M. Kimball: 1986, ‘Les filles et les sciences’, in L. Lafortune, ed,Femmes et mathématique, Montréal, Remue-ménage, pp. 101–136.Google Scholar
  68. Nemiroff G. H.: 1988,Beyond 'Talking Heads': 'Toward an Empowering Pedagogy of Women's Studies, Windsor, Communication présentée aux Sociétés savantes, Association canadienne des études sur les femmes/Canadian Women's Studies Association.Google Scholar
  69. Nieves-Squires S.: 1990,Hispanic Women in Academe, Issues and Strategies, Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  70. O'Brien M.: 1990, ‘Political, ideology and patriarchal education’, in F. Forman, M. O'Brien, J. Haddad, D. Hallman and P. Masters,Féminism and Education, Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Centre for Women's Studies in Education, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
  71. Omolade B.: 1987, ‘A black feminist pedagogy’,Women's Studies Quarterly 15(3&4), 32–39.Google Scholar
  72. Porter N. and M. Eileenchild: 1980,The Effectiveness of Women's Studies Teaching, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institute of Education Program on Teaching and Learning, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  73. Poyatos F., ed: 1988,Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication, C.J. Hogrefe, Toronto.Google Scholar
  74. Poynton C.: 1989,Language and Gender: Making the Difference, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  75. Reyes L. H., Stanic G. M. and Lappan V.: 1988, ‘Gender and race equity in primary and middle school mathematics classrooms’,Arithmetic Teacher 35 (8), 46–48.Google Scholar
  76. Rifkin J.: 1985, ‘Teaching Mediation: a Feminist Perspective on the Study of Law’, in M. Culley and C. Portuges,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 96–107.Google Scholar
  77. Rogers C.: 1976,Liberté pour apprendre, Dunod, Paris.Google Scholar
  78. Sadker M. and D. Sadker: 1991,Teachers, Schools and Society, McGraw Hill, New York, Montreal.Google Scholar
  79. Sadker M. and D. Sadker: 1985, ‘Sexism in the classroom’,Psychology Today 19(3), 54–57.Google Scholar
  80. Schniedewind N.: 1987, ‘Teaching feminist process’,Women's Studies Quarterly 15(3&4), 15–31.Google Scholar
  81. Secada W. G.: 1992, ‘Race, Ethnicity, Social Class, Language and Achievement in Mathematics’, in D. A. Grouws, ed,Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York, Macmillan, pp. 623–660.Google Scholar
  82. Shrewsbury C. M.: 1987, ‘What is feminist pedagogy?’,Women's Studies Quarterly 15(3&4), 6–14.Google Scholar
  83. Solar C.: 1994, ‘Femmes, mathématiques et pédagogie’, in C. Solar and L. Lafortune, eds,Des mathématiques autrement, Montréal, Remue-m énage, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
  84. Solar C.: 1992a, ‘Dentelle de pédagogies féministes’,Revue canadienne de l'éducation/Canadian Journal of Education 17(3), 264–285.Google Scholar
  85. Solar C. ed: 1992b,Inequity in the Classroom, Montreal, Office on the Status of Women, Concordia University.Google Scholar
  86. Solar C.: 1988,Les connaissances liées à la transformation du cadre de réf érence dans la démarche féministe, PhD dissertation, Montréal, Université de Montr éal.Google Scholar
  87. Solar C. and L. Lafortune: 1994,Des mathématiques autrement, Montréal, Remue-ménage.Google Scholar
  88. Solar C., Lafortune L., Kayler H., Barette M., Caron R. and Paquin L.: 1992, ‘Où en sommes-nous?’, in L. Lafortune and H. Kayler,Les femmes font des maths, Montréal, Remue-ménage, pp. 15–39.Google Scholar
  89. Spelman E.: 1988,Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought, Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  90. Spelman E.: 1985, ‘Combating the marginalization of black women in the classroom’, in M. Culley and C. Portages,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 240–244.Google Scholar
  91. Spender D.: 1985,Man Made Language, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  92. Spender D. and Sarah E.: 1980,Learning to Lose: Sexism and Education, The Women's Press, London.Google Scholar
  93. Stanworth M.: 1983,Gender and Schooling: A Study of Sexual Divisions in the Classroom, Hutchison in association with the Exploration in Feminism Collective, London.Google Scholar
  94. Thorne B.: 1984, ‘Rethinking the way we teach’, in K. Loring,Feminist Pedagogy and the Learning Climate, Proceedings of the 9th Annual GLCA Women's Studies Association, Ann Arbor, Great Lakes Colleges Association. Women's Studies Program.Google Scholar
  95. Thorne B., Kramarae C. and N. Henley: 1983,Language, Gender and Society, Rowley, Mass., Newbury House.Google Scholar
  96. Tite R.: 1986,Sex-Role Learning and the Woman Teacher: A Feminist Perspective, Perspectives féministes No 7, Ottawa, Institut canadien de recherche sur les femmes/Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.Google Scholar
  97. Van Dick T. A.: 1987,Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
  98. Vida G.: 1978,Our Right to Love. A Lesbian Resource Book, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  99. Walsh M. R: 1988, ‘Conference Report: Teaching and Learning About the Psychology of Women’,Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 13 (4), 886–891.Google Scholar
  100. Washington M. H.: 1985, ‘How Racial Differences Helped Us Discover Our Common Ground’, in M. Culley and C. Portuges,Gendered Subjects. The Dynamics of Feminist Teaching, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 221–229.Google Scholar
  101. Weiler K.: 1991, ‘Freire and a Feminist Pedagogy of Difference’,Harvard Educational Review 61(4), 449–474.Google Scholar
  102. Weiler K.: 1988,Women Teaching for Change. Gender, Class and Power, Massachussets, Critical Studies in Education Series, Bergin and Garvey Publishers.Google Scholar
  103. Yaguello M.: 1978,Les mots et les femmes, Petite Bibliothèque Payot, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudie Solar
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de psychopédagogie et d'andragogie Faculté de sciences de l'éducationUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations