Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 199–217 | Cite as

Mathematics achievement and gender: A longitudinal study of selected cognitive and affective variables [grades 6–12]

  • Lindsay Anne Tartre
  • Elizabeth Fennema
Article

Abstract

This study examined the relationship of selected cognitive and affective variables to mathematics achievement for a random sample of 60 students as they progressed through 6th, 8th,10th and 12th grades. A consistent gender difference was found for stereotyping mathematics as a male domain. No consistent significant gender difference between means was found for spatial skills, verbal skill or mathematics achievement. Confidence, verbal skill and spatial visualization were each consistently positively correlated with mathematics achievement for both males and females. No gender difference was found for these correlations. However, spatial skills alone were found to be consistent significant predictors of mathematics achievement for females each year of the study, but not for males. Verbal skill was a consistent significant predictor of mathematics achievement for males, but not for females. The results of this study could lead to a reevaluation of the hypothesis that spatial skills help boys achieve in mathematics.

Keywords

Gender Difference Longitudinal Study Random Sample 12th Grade Significant Gender Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, L. R.: 1971, ‘Intellectual variables and mathematics achievement: directions for research’,Journal of School Psychology 9, 201–212.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, J.M.: 1985, ‘A national assessment of participation and achievement of women in mathematics’, in S.F. Chipman, L.R. Brush and D.M. Wilson (eds.),Women and Mathematics: Balancing the Equation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 59–94.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, G. K., H.G. Seashore, and A.G. Wesman: 1973,Differential Aptitude Tests: Administrator's Handbook, The Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Educational Testing Service: 1979,Sequential Test of Educational Progress: Mathematics Basic Concepts, CTB/McGraw- Hill, Monterey, California.Google Scholar
  5. Ekstrom, R. B., J. W. French, and H. H. Harmon: 1976,Manual for Kit of Factor-referenced Cognitive Tests, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  6. Fennema, E. and J. Sherman: 1976, ‘Fennema- Sherman mathematics attitude sales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males’, inJSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 6, 31. (Ms. No. 1225) (Reprinted by Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison).Google Scholar
  7. Fennema, E. and J. Sherman: 1977, ‘Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors’,American Education Research Journal 14(1), 51–71.Google Scholar
  8. Houghton Mifflin Company: 1971,Tests of Academic Progress (Form S, Mathematics, grades 9–12), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.Google Scholar
  9. Hyde, J. S., E. Fennema, and S. J. Lamon: 1990, ‘Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis’,Psychology Bulletin 107, 139–155.Google Scholar
  10. Hyde, J. S. and M. C. Linn: 1988, ‘Gender differences in verbal ability: a meta-analysis’,Psychology Bulletin 104, 53–69.Google Scholar
  11. Leder, G.C.: 1990, ‘Gender differences in mathematics: an overview’, in E. Fennema and G. Leder (eds.),Mathematics and Gender: Influences on Teachers and Students, Teachers' College Press, New York, pp. 10–26.Google Scholar
  12. Maccoby, E.E. and C. Jacklin N.: 1974,The Pyschology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. McGee, M. G.: 1979, ‘Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences’,Psychological Bulletin 86(5, 889–918.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, M.R. and M. S. Koehler: 1990, ‘Internal influences on gender differences in mathematics’, in E. Fennema and G. Leder (eds.),Mathematics and Gender: Influences on Teachers and Students, Teachers' College Press, New York, pp. 60–95.Google Scholar
  15. Naslund, R. A., L. P. Thorpe and D. W. LaFever: 1971,Manual for Mathematics Concepts, Science Research Associates, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Tartre, L. A.: 1990, ‘Spatial skills, gender and mathematics’, in E. Fennema and Leder, G. (eds.),Mathematics and gender: Influences on Teachers and Students, Teachers' College Press, New York, pp. 27–59.Google Scholar
  17. Thorndike, R. L. and E. Hagen: 1975,Manual for the Cognitive Abilities Test, (Form 1, Levels A–H), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsay Anne Tartre
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Fennema
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCalifornia State UniversityLong BeachUSA
  2. 2.Wisconsin Centre for Educational ResearchUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations