Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 35–54

Generating multiple solutions for a problem: A comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students

  • Edward A. Silver
  • Shukkwan S. Leung
  • Jinfa Cai
Article

Abstract

A task involving simple mathematics, yet complex in its call for the generation of multiple solution methods, was administered to about 150 U.S. students, most of whom were in fourth grade. Written responses were examined for correctness, evidence of strategy use and mode of explanation. Results for the U.S. sample were also compared to those obtained from about 200 Japanese fourth-grade students. Students in both countries (a) produced multiple solutions and explanations of their solutions, (b) exhibited almost identical patterns and frequency of strategy use across response occasions, and (c) used the same kinds of explanations, with a majority of the responses involving solution explanations that combined both visual and verbal/symbolic features. Nevertheless, Japanese students tended to produce explanations involving more sophisticated mathematical ideas (multiplication rather than addition) and formalisms (mathematical expressions rather than verbal explanations) than did U.S. students.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J. P. (ed.): 1992,Report of U.S.-Japan Cross-National Research on Students' Problem Solving Behaviors, Columbus, OH: Eric Smoek Clearinghouse (ED 351-204).Google Scholar
  2. Becker, J. P., and T. Miwa (eds.): 1987,Proceedings of the U.S.-Japan Seminar on Mathematical Problem Solving, Columbus, OH: Eric Smoek Clearinghouse (ED 304-315)Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Chaim, D., G. Lappan and R. Houang: 1989, ‘Adolescents' ability to communicate spatial information: Analyzing and effecting students' performance’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 20, 121–146.Google Scholar
  4. Duke, B.: 1986,The Japanese School: Lessons for Industrial America, Praeger Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Hart, M. E., and K. Travers: 1992, ‘The matchsticks problem: Results of an analysis of U.S. students' solutions’, in J. P. Becker (ed.),Report of U.S.-Japan cross-national research on students' problem solving behaviors, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL., p. 25–33.Google Scholar
  6. Mayer, R. E., H. Tajika and C. Stanley: 1991, ‘Mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States: A controlled comparison’,Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 69–72.Google Scholar
  7. McKnight, C. C., F. J. Crosswhite, J. A. Dossey, E. Kifer, J. O. Swafford, K. J. Travers and T. J. Cooney: 1987,The Underachieving Curriculum: Assessing U.S. Mathematics from an International Perspective, Stipes Publishing Company, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Nagasaki, E.: 1990,An Analysis on the Results of Common Survey on ‘Marble Arrangement’ in Japan-U.S. Collaborative Research on Mathematical Problem Solving, National Institute for Educational Research, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  9. Nagasaki, E., and S. Yoshikawa: 1989,Analysis of Japanese Results on ‘Marble Arrangement’ in Common Survey, National Institute for Educational Research, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  10. Silver, E. A.: 1987, ‘Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem solving and instruction’, in A. H. Schoenfeld (ed.),Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ., p. 33–60.Google Scholar
  11. Stevenson, H. W., and S. Y. Lee: 1990,Contexts of Achievement: A Study of American, Chinese, and Japanese Children, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Stevenson, H. W., S. Y. Lee and J. W. Stigler: 1986, ‘Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children’,Science 231, p. 693–699.Google Scholar
  13. Stigler, J. W., S. Y. Lee, and H. W. Stevenson: 1987, ‘Mathematics classrooms in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States’,Child Development 58, p. 1272–1285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Silver
    • 1
  • Shukkwan S. Leung
    • 2
  • Jinfa Cai
    • 3
  1. 1.Learning Research and Development Center and Dept. of Curriculum & InstructionUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghU.S.A
  2. 2.Dept. of Mathematics and Science EducationNational Chiayi Teachers CollegeChia YiTaiwan; R.O.C
  3. 3.Dept. of Mathematics, Statistics & Computer ScienceMarguetle UniversityMilwaukeeU.S.A

Personalised recommendations